Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021 Mar 1;72(3):456–473. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003017

TABLE 6.

Statements

Statements Consensus rate
1. The diagnostic process and care of a patient with suspected or confirmed monogenic IBD is best coordinated by a multidisciplinary team of specialists, including gastroenterologists, geneticists, immunologists, and other subspecialists contingent on the individual gene defect, comorbidities and extraintestinal manifestations 32/32 (100%)
2. Next-generation DNA sequencing technologies are recommended to diagnose known monogenic causes of IBD in routine clinical practice 32/32 (100%)
3. Genetic screening for monogenic IBD is recommended in all patients with infantile-onset IBD (<2 years) and should be considered in patients with very early-onset IBD (<6 years), in particular, in those patients with relevant comorbidity, extraintestinal manifestations, and/or family history 31/32 (97%)
4. Although a rare or very rare diagnosis, a monogenic form of IBD should be considered in patients with any paediatric or adult age IBD-onset if they present with relevant comorbidity, extraintestinal manifestations, and/or family history 27/32 (84%)
5. Routine genetic screening for all IBD patients is not recommended since a monogenic cause of IBD in patients with IBD onset over 6 year of age, especially those with adolescent or adult age onset of IBD is exceptional in the absence of relevant comorbidity 32/32 (100%)
6. Genetic investigations to establish monogenic IBD are recommended in advance of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation unless the bowel inflammation can be clearly explained (eg, drug-induced colitis) 32/32 (100%)
7. Panel sequencing, exome, and genome sequencing technologies have complementary diagnostic strength; the first-line technology should be guided by availability and degree of diagnostic suspicion 30/32 (94%)
8. Functional assessment of novel gene defects and variants of unknown significance is necessary to establish causality 32/32 (100%)
9. Patients and their families with suspected or confirmed monogenic IBD should be offered the opportunity to participate in research studies. A therapeutically relevant genetic result established in a research setting should be confirmed in a clinical genetics setting 30/32 (94%)

IBD = inflammatory bowel disease.

*

Comments: relevant comorbidities and extraintestinal manifestations and family history are summarised in Box 2.