Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2020 Dec 25;128(7):1016–1026. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.12.020

Table 5.

Performance (area under the ROC curve with 95% confidence interval, area under the PR curve with 95% confidence interval) of models trained on both clinical data and visual fields, exclusively visual fields, and exclusively clinical data given 4 timesteps of data with respect to ground truth from traditional algorithms corresponding to Figure 4.

Reference MD slope VFI slope PLR
Model AUROC AUPR AUROC AUPR AUROC AUPR
Clinical Data and Visual Fields 0.939 (±0.008) 0.772 (±0.121) 0.892 (±0.012) 0.786 (±0.045) 0.915 (±0.009) 0.794 (±0.060)
Visual Fields Only 0.815 (±0.015) 0.519 (±0.128) 0.794 (±0.020) 0.490 (±0.101) 0.794 (±0.015) 0.526 (±0.079)
Clinical Data Only 0.743 (±0.018) 0.507 (±0.058) 0.756 (±0.019) 0.467 (±0.151) 0.792 (±0.014) 0.625 (±0.121)

MD = Mean Deviation, PLR = Pointwise Linear Regression, VFI = Visual Field Index.