Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 10;9:685128. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.685128

TABLE 2.

hAM used as a covering graft material.

Indication No. of patients Graft storage format Graft size (mm)/Side Multilayered use/Folding Post-surgical care/Additional covering to protect hAM Fate/Resorption References and year
Mucosal defect after excision of oral submucous fibrosis 25 Fresh Adapted to the size of the defect No Nasogastric feeding for 1 week Epithelialization (with no indication about the time) Lai et al., 1995
Mucosal defect after excision of cancerous/precancerous lesions 10 Dried and irradiated Various sizes: from 21 × 18 mm to 60 × 35 mm mesenchymal side facing the wound No hAM placed directly on the wound, stabilized using a pressure dressing of antibiotic ointment gauze removed at day 6 Oral feeding At day 6: hAM nearly invisible Full epithelialization obtained in a maximum of 6 weeks Arai et al., 2012
Mucosal defect after excision of cancerous lesions 50 Cryopreserved 100 × 100 mm, then adapted to size of defect No ND At 3 weeks: good granulation tissue formation At 1 month: good surface epithelialization Khademi et al., 2013
Mucosal defect after excision of cancerous/precancerous lesions 34 Cryopreserved 40 × 40 mm No Nasogastric feeding for 1 week At 3 months: good epithelialization in 100% of patients Kar et al., 2014
Mucosal defect after excision of benign or precancerous lesions 5 Autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell cultured on de-epithelialized cryopreserved hAM Adapted to size of defect No Suture removal at 1 week At 1 month: full epithelialization Amemiya et al., 2015
Mandibular vestibuloplasty 20 Lyophilized and irradiated Adapted to size of defect identical mesenchymal side facing the wound No No stent Tight compression dressing over the lower lip Day 10: hAM is not differentiated from the surrounding tissues; epithelialization continuation in the graft After 2 weeks: complete resorption of hAM After 3 weeks: graft zone covered by oral mucosa After 4 weeks: complete recovery of the graft Guler et al., 1997
Mandibular vestibuloplasty 7 Fresh 60 × 100 mm2, then adapted to size of defect mesenchymal side facing the periosteum No Protection with a splint covered with a tetracycline topical gel and fixed with sutures, removed after 1 week After 2 weeks: persistence of small segments of hAM After 3 weeks: complete resorption of the hAM, grafted zone still identifiable After 3 months: no difference between the grafted zone and the surrounding mucosa Samandari et al., 2004
Mandibular vestibuloplasty 10 Preserved in glycerol 60 × 100 mm3, then adapted to size of defect mesenchymal side facing the periosteum No Use of a suction catheter stent fixed to surrounding mucosa, removed after week 1 After 3 weeks: complete resorption of the hAM, grafted zone still identifiable After 3 months: no difference between grafted zone and surrounding mucosa Sharma et al., 2011
Mandibular vestibuloplasty 10 Preserved in glycerol 60 × 100 mm, then adapted to size of defect No Protection with a splint secured with bone screws, removed at day 7, with cleaning of the surgical site ND Kothari et al., 2011
Mandibular vestibuloplasty 2 Dried and irradiated 40 × 20 mm, then adapted to size of defect No Surgical splint fixed over the hAM (with mini-screws) and removed at 1 week Oral feeding started the day after surgery At 1 week: hAM nearly invisible Full epithelialization obtained in a maximum of 6 weeks, with sufficient keratinized gingiva Tsuno et al., 2014
Oronasal fistulae 4 Cryopreserved 50 × 50 mm, then adapted to size of defect 5 layers Protection with a palatal plate ND Rohleder et al., 2013

Number of applications = 1. ND: not done.