Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 24;2021(6):CD010070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010070.pub3

Konishi 2001.

Study characteristics
Methods
  • Study design: cross‐over RCT

  • Time frame: 1998 to 2002

  • Duration of study (weeks): total (3); run in (1); interventions (1); no washout

Participants
  • Country: Japan

  • Setting: single centre, Osaka City General Hospital

  • Inclusion criteria: IgA nephropathy as diagnosed by percutaneous kidney biopsy

  • Baseline characteristics

    • GFR: not reported

    • BP: not reported

  • Number: 38

  • Mean age ± SD: 45 ± 15 years

  • Sex: 14/27

  • Exclusion criteria: other kidney or heart disease; taking any medication

Interventions Low salt group
  • Sodium intake: 87 mmol/day (meals provided)

  • Duration: 1 week


High salt group
  • Sodium intake: 209 mmol/day (meals provided)

  • Duration: 1 week


Other information
  • Study diets contained the same amount of protein (1.2 g/kg body weight/day) and calories (35 kcal/kg/day)

  • Participants were asked to maintain usual levels of physical activity and to refrain from drugs for 1 week before and during the study

  • Co‐interventions: none

Outcomes
  • 24‐hour BP (hourly measurements)

  • 24‐hour proteinuria

  • Serum markers (electrolytes, renin, aldosterone)

  • Renal plasma flow, CrCl

  • Measurement of sodium intake: 24‐hour urine (3 days)

  • Measurement of confounders: assumed medications recorded from medical charts

Notes
  • Funding: not reported

  • Additional data: provided by authors

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Information not provided however outcomes were objective and unlikely to be influenced by performance bias
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Information not provided. However, given nature of outcomes (objective and results not available immediately)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No evidence of reporting bias; however, study registration could not be located
Carry‐over effect Unclear risk Short interventions with no washout ‐ carry over effect may be present
Bias from confounders Unclear risk Standardised meals were provided reducing risk of dietary confounders, but as confounders (e.g. potassium intake, weight loss) were not discussed, risk of bias is unclear. Medications not reported but protocol was to refrain from medications
Other Unclear risk Funding not reported