Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 10;12:656632. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.656632

Table 2.

Prediction performance of the signature between AR and STA in the training set.

Distinction AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) Accuracy (95% CI) Disease prevalence (95% CI) Cut-off point P value
AR vs STA 0.89 (0.824 - 0.962) 90.91 (78.33% - 97.47%) 80.00 (64.35% - 90.95%) 83.33 (72.76% - 90.35%) 88.89 (75.63% - 95.38%) 85.71 (76.38% - 92.39%) 52.38 (41.19% - 63.40%) 0.408887 <0.0001

PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.