Table 2.
Quality appraisal of the qualitative papers
| First author (year) | CASP criteria satisfied | Unclear criteria | CASP criteria Unmet | Proportion of satisfied criteria (n%) | Assessment | Main criteria not achieved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fennell-wells (2020) [12] | 7 | 2 | 0 | 7/9 (77.7%) | Good | N/A |
| Høyvik (2019) [8] | 7 | 3 | 2 | 7/12 (58.3%) | Good | No Confidence Interval calculated |
| Furnadzhieva (2017) [30] | 8 | 2 | 0 | 8/10 (80%) | Good | Relationship between researcher and participants not mentioned |
| Zukanović (2018) [33] | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5/10 (50%) | Satisfactory | Validity of questionnaire not mentioned |
| Mattila (2016) [32] | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5/10 (50%) | Satisfactory | Relationship between researcher and participants not mentioned |