Table 3. The Comparison of Catalytic Effect of Different on AP Reported in the Literatures and This Study.
| number | type of catalysts | preparation method of AP composite | usage amount of catalyst (%) | heating rate (°C/min) | TH (°C) | references |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CuCr2O4 | mechanical grinding | 3 | 10 | 305.4 | this study |
| 2 | CuCr2O4 | mechanical grinding | 3 | 20 | 317.6 | this study |
| 3 | CuCr2O4 | thermal decomposition | 3 | 10 | 331.1 | (13) |
| 4 | CuCr2O4 | sol–gel | 5 | 10 | 338.6 | (14) |
| 5 | CuCr2O4 | electrochemical | 2 | 10 | 349.4 | (22) |
| 6 | CuCr2O4 | chemical liquid deposition | 6 | 10 | 346.0 | (15) |
| 7 | CuO | coprecipitation | 1 | 10 | 350.4 | (23) |
| 8 | CuO | surfactant-mediated method | 1 | 10 | 317.2 | (24) |
| 9 | CuO | sol–gel | 3 | 20 | 353.1 | (25) |
| 10 | CuO | hydrothermal | 2 | 20 | 339.3 | (26) |
| 11 | CuO@Cr2O3 | mechanical grind method | 2 | 20 | 351.1 | (27) |
| 12 | CuO/Fe2O3 | solid phase method | 2 | 20 | 335.3 | (28) |
| 13 | CNTs/CuO | coprecipitation | 8 | 20 | 333.1 | (29) |