Skip to main content
. 2021 May;50(5):852–865. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6103

Table 2:

Intersectoral collaboration criteria in the area of health promotion

Level Basic Criteria Frequency Percentage (%)
➢ Boundary spanner leadership 16
➢ Task management(balance between roles and activities) 8
➢ Education and capacity building 10
Micro ➢ Conflict resolution 7
➢ Trust building 9
➢ Transparency in collaboration 4
➢ Structure of communication(formal and informal) 14
➢ willingness to continue/positive experience 7
➢ Sharing knowledge and information 13
➢ Opportunity for dialogue/create common language 7
➢ Considering culture of actors
Total 100 39.37%
➢ Engaging various participants 17
Meso ➢ Monitoring communication and result of participation 9
➢ Considering common interest for contributor 6
➢ Responsiveness 5
➢ Financial and non-financial resources 12
➢ Efficiency 2
➢ Research 2
➢ Definition of indicator 4
➢ Time allocation 4
➢ Official committee 2
Total 63 24.80%
➢ Societal and political context 9
Macro ➢ Commitment 8
➢ Shared mission 6
➢ Shared vision 10
➢ Shared goals 14
➢ Considering value of actors 17
➢ Comprehensive support (political, organizational, motivational) 6
➢ Formal and legal agreement 5
➢ Power(sharing / balancing)
➢ Planning and clear decision making mechanism 9
➢ Use of local structure/media 4
Total 91 35.82%