Table 2.
Study (Year) |
Item, Score (Point) |
Total |
|||||||
Selectiona |
Comparabilityb | Outcomec |
|||||||
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
||
Arnason et al12 (2004) | c (0) | a (1) | a (1) | NA | a (1) | a (1) | a (1) | a (1) | 6 |
Attenborough et al13 (2016) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | NA | a (1) | a (1) | a (1) | b (1) | 7 |
Bahr and Bahr27 (1997) | b (1) | a (1) | b (1) | NA | a (1) | b (1) | a (1) | b (1) | 7 |
Barrett et al14 (1993) | b (1) | a (1) | b (1) | NA | a (1) | b (1) | a (1) | b (1) | 7 |
Baumhauer et al15 (1995) | b (1) | a (1) | b (1) | NA | a (1) | a (1) | a (1) | b (1) | 7 |
Cumps et al34 (2007) | c (0) | a (1) | b (1) | NA | a (1) | a (1) | a (1) | b (1) | 6 |
de Noronha et al11 (2013) | c (0) | a (1) | b (1) | NA | a (1) | a (1) | a (1) | b (1) | 6 |
Ekstrand and Gillquist28 (1983) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | NA | a (1) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | 7 |
Faude et al29 (2006) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | NA | a (1) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | 7 |
Frey et al23 (2010) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | NA | a (1) | b (1) | a (1) | d (0) | 6 |
Hartley et al24 (2018) | c (0) | a (1) | a (1) | NA | a (1) | a (1) | a (1) | d (0) | 5 |
Henry et al33 (2016) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | NA | a (1) | a (1) | a (1) | d (0) | 6 |
Hiller et al16 (2008) | b (1) | a (1) | b (1) | NA | a (1) | a (1) | a (1) | b (1) | 7 |
Kofotolis and Kellis30 (2007) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | NA | a (1) | b (1) | a (1) | b (1) | 7 |
Kofotolis et al31 (2007) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | NA | a (1) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | 7 |
McGuine and Keene25 (2006) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | NA | a (1) | b (1) | a (1) | b (1) | 7 |
Meeuwisse et al26 (2003) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | NA | a (1) | b (1) | a (1) | b (1) | 7 |
Milgrom et al32 (1991) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | NA | a (1) | b (1) | a (1) | d (0) | 6 |
Pourkazemi et al8 (2018) | a (1) | a (1) | b (1) | NA | a (1) | b (1) | a (1) | a (1) | 7 |
Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; Q, question.
Q1, Representativeness of the exposed cohort; Q2, Selection of the nonexposed cohort; Q3, Ascertainment of exposure; Q4, Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at the start of the study.
Q1, Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis.
Q1, Assessment of outcome; Q2, Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur?; Q3, Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts.