Table 4.
Sex |
Study (Year) |
Group, No. |
Group, Subsequent Lateral Ankle Sprain, No. (%) |
Risk Ratio (95% CI)a |
||
No Lateral Ankle Sprain History |
Lateral Ankle Sprain History |
No Lateral Ankle Sprain History |
Lateral Ankle Sprain History |
|||
Male | Arnason et al12 (2004) | 305 | 212 | 3 (1.0) | 11 (5.2) | 5.28 (1.49, 18.68)b |
Hartley et al24 (2018) | 346 | 38 | 20 (5.8) | 19 (50.0) | 8.65 (5.09, 14.71)b | |
Henry et al33 (2016) | 162 | 48 | 9 (5.6) | 5 (10.4) | 1.88 (0.66, 5.33) | |
Kofotolis et al31 (2007) | 180 | 132 | 55 (30.6) | 84 (63.6) | 2.08 (1.61, 2.69)b | |
Meeuwisse et al26 (2003) | 281 | 167 | 33 (11.7) | 27 (16.2) | 1.38 (0.86, 2.21) | |
Milgrom et al32 (1991) | 339 | 51 | 51 (15.0) | 16 (31.4) | 2.09 (1.29, 3.36)b | |
Female | Attenborough et al13 (2016) | 40 | 54 | 6 (15.0) | 5 (9.3) | 0.62 (0.20, 1.88) |
Faude et al29 (2006) | 56 | 87 | 11 (19.6) | 22 (25.3) | 1.29 (0.68, 2.44) | |
Hartley et al24 (2018) | 146 | 21 | 13 (8.9) | 8 (38.1) | 4.28 (2.02, 9.08)b | |
Kofotolis and Kellis30 (2007) | 64 | 138 | 8 (12.5) | 24 (17.4) | 1.39 (0.66, 2.93) |
Risk ratios compared the risk of subsequent lateral ankle sprain in the lateral ankle sprain history group versus the no lateral ankle sprain history group, which served as the referent.
Indicates risk ratio was different (ie, 95% CI excluded 1.00).