Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 21;55(13):751–758. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103277

Table 1.

Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness at 6-month follow-up between participants randomised to usual practice (control) or the Burn 2 Learn intervention

Primary outcome (6 months) No of clusters (participants) Mean change from baseline (95% CI) Adjusted difference at follow-up*
Control Intervention Control Intervention Coefficient (95% CI) P value
Cardiorespiratory fitness: intention-to-treat† 10 (310) 10 (329) −3.52 (−5.50 to −1.54) 0.91 (−0.46 to 2.28) 4.10 (1.78 to 6.42) <0.001
Cardiorespiratory fitness: complete case‡ 10 (211) 10 (234) −3.52 (−5.50 to −1.54) 0.91 (−0.46 to 2.28) 4.43 (2.08 to 6.78) <0.001
Cardiorespiratory fitness: multiple imputation§ 10 (310) 10 (329) −3.01 (−4.47 to −1.56) 0.97 (−0.22 to 2.16) 3.98 (1.61 to 6.36) <0.001
Cardiorespiratory fitness: per protocol (group)¶ 10 (310) 7 (226) −3.52 (−5.50 to −1.54) 1.55 (−0.13 to 3.23) 4.61 (1.98 to 7.24) <0.001
Cardiorespiratory fitness: per protocol (individual)** 10 (310) 10 (133) −3.52 (−5.50 to −1.54) 1.20 (−0.69 to 3.09) 4.23 (1.19 to 7.26) 0.007

*Adjusted difference ((intervention post-test mean−intervention baseline mean)−(control post-test mean−control baseline mean)) in multi-stage fitness test laps. P value adjusted for clustering and randomisation pair.

†Intention-to-treat analysis included all participants who completed the multi-stage fitness test at baseline or follow-up.

‡Complete case analysis included participants who completed the multi-stage fitness test at baseline and follow-up.

§Multiple imputation analysis included all participants who completed the multi-stage fitness test at baseline or follow-up.

¶Class-level per-protocol analysis included students from classes in which at least 28 school-based sessions were delivered.

**Student-level per-protocol analysis included students who achieved an average peak heart rate (HR) of ≥80% HRmax during sessions.