Additional Table 6.
Pairwise meta-analysis results of balance
| Study | SMD (95%CI) |
|---|---|
| LF vs. HF | |
| Cha et al. (2014) | 1.23 (0.34,2.12) |
| HF vs. Sham | |
| Choietal. (2016) | 0.14 (-0.58, 0.86) |
| iTBS vs. Sham | τ2=1.05,I2=85% |
| Kochetal. (2019) | 1.73 (0.93,2.54) |
| Linetal. (2019) | -0.08 (-0.95, 0.80) |
| Linetal. (2019) | -0.20 (-1.08,0.68) |
| Summary | 0.50 (-0.76, 1.76) |
| LF vs. Sham | τ2=0.04, I2=37% |
| Chen (2018) | 0.01 (-0.22, 0.25) |
| Elkholy et al. (2014) | 0.93 (0.28,1.58) |
| Forogh et al. (2017) | 0.38 (-0.39, 1.16) |
| Huang etal. (2018) | 0.22 (-0.42, 0.86) |
| Kim et al. (2014b) | -0.11 (-0.86,0.64) |
| Rastgoo et al. (2016) | 0.04 (-0.58, 0.66) |
| Wang et al. (2016) | 0.48 (-0.25, 1.21) |
| Zhao etal. (2018) | 0.55 (0.09,1.01) |
| Summary | 0.28 (0.03,0.52) |
Heterogeneity standard deviation (τ2) has been estimated using the methods of moments and is reported only for comparisons for which is estimable and larger than 0. CI: Confidence interval; dTMS: deep transcranial magnetic stimulation; HF: high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; iTBS: intermittent theta-burst stimulation; LF: low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; SMD: standardized mean difference.