Additional Table 10.
Pairwise meta-analysis results of Barthel Index
| Study | SMD (95%CI) |
|---|---|
| HF vs. Sham | τ=0.29, I2=70% |
| Chang et al. (2010) | 1.56 (0.67,2.45) |
| Duetal. (2016) | 0.90 (0.29, 1.51) |
| Guan et al. (2017) | 0.18 (-0.42, 0.79) |
| Summary | 0.83 (0.09, 1.56) |
| iTBS vs. Sham | τ4.17, I2=95% |
| Kochetal. (2019) | 3.05 (2.03,4.07) |
| Linetal. (2019) | 0.08 (-0.80, 0.96) |
| Summary | 1.55 (-1.36,4.46) |
| LF vs. Sham | |
| Duetal. (2016) | 0.90 (0.29, 1.51) |
| Huang et al. (2018) | 0.31 (-0.33, 0.96) |
| Linetal. (2015) | 0.46 (-0.25, 1.16) |
| Meng and Song (2017) | 0.95 (0.01, 1.88) |
| Summary | 0.63 (0.28, 0.97) |
Heterogeneity standard deviation (τ2) has been estimated using the methods of moments and is reported only for comparisons for which is estimable and larger than 0. CI: Confidence interval; HF: high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; iTBS: intermittent theta-burst stimulation; LF: low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; SMD: standardized mean difference.