Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 27;16(6):1168–1176. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.300341

Additional Table 1.

Risk of bias assessment according to Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale

Study Eligibility criteria specified (0/1) Random allocation (0/1) Concealed allocation (0/1) Comparable at baseline (0/1) Blinded subjects (0/1) Blinded therapists (0/1) Blinded assessors (0/1) Adequate follow-up (0/1) Intention-totreat analysis (0/1) Between group comparisons (0/1) Point estimates and variability (0/1) Summary
Cha et al. (2014) 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 8
Cha and Kim (2015) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Cha and Kim (2017) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Chang et al. (2010) 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9
Chen (2018) 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 7
Chieffo et al. (2014) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 6
Choi et al. (2016) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Du et al. (2016) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
Elkholy et al. (2014) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Forogh et al. (2017) 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Guan et al. (2017) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
Huang et al. (2018) 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 8
Ji et al.(2014) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Ji and Kim (2015) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Kakuda et al. (2013) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Kim et al. (2014b) 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Koch et al. (2019) 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 8
Lin et al.(2015) 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 7
Lin et al. (2019) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
Liu et al. (2019) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 8
Meng and Song (2017) 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Rastgoo et al. (2016) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Wang et al. (2012) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 9
Wang et al. (2016) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Wang et al.(2019) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 10
Zhao et al. (2018) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 7

0 indicates the criterion was not satisfied; 1 the criterion was satisfied.