Table 3.

Relative effects estimated from the network meta-analysis and from a sensitivity analysis comparing every pair of the five interventions with respect to the Fugl-Meyer assessment

HF	1.02 (–1.72, 3.64)	–0.44 (–2.87, 1.96)	–0.39 (–5.88, 4.84)	2.32 (–3.05, 7.74)
–1.48 (–3.52, 0.79)	LF	–1.46 (–3.27, 0.28)	–1.45 (–6.38, 3.71)	1.30 (–3.73, 6.53)
0.85 (–0.98, 2.80)	2.28 (0.92, 3.62)	Sham	–0.00 (–4.70, 4.86)	2.79 (–1.95, 7.65)
0.34 (–6.47, 7.65)	1.81 (–4.93, 8.94)	–0.55 (–7.04, 6.48)	dTMS	2.70 (–3.92, 9.71)
–1.63 (–6.17, 2.75)	–0.19 (–4.66, 4.04)	–2.53 (–6.68, 1.46)	–2.23 (–10.04, 5.89)	iTBS

Upper triangle: network meta-analysis; lower triangle: sensitivity analysis. dTMS: Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation; HF: high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; iTBS: intermittent theta-burst stimulation; LF: low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.