Additional Table 4.
Pairwise meta-analysis results of speed.
| Study | SMD (95%CI) |
|---|---|
| dTMS vs. Sham | |
| Chieffo et al. (2014) | 0.15 (-0.77,1.08) |
| HF vs. Sham | |
| Cha and Kim (2017) | 0.95 (0.02,1.89) |
| Cha and Kim (2015) | 0.75 (0.01,1.49) |
| Ji et al. (2014) | 0.77(0.01,1.53) |
| Ji et al. (2015) | 0.75 (0.10,1.41) |
| Kakudaetal. (2013) | 0.28 (-0.65,1.21) |
| Wang et al. (2019) | 0.57 (-0.52,1.66) |
| Summary | 0.70 (0.37,1.03) |
| iTBS vs. Sham | |
| Linetal. (2019) | -0.36 (-1.24,0.53) |
| LF vs. Sham | τ2=0.51,τ2=77% |
| Elkholy et al. (2014) | 1.76 (1.03,2.48) |
| Kim et al. (2014b) | 0.74 (-0.09,1.58) |
| Wang et al. (2012) | 0.22 (-0.53, 0.97) |
| Summary | 0.91 (-0.01,1.83) |
Heterogeneity standard deviation (τ2)has been estimated using the methods of moments and is reported only for comparisons for which is estimable and larger than 0. CI: Confidence interval; dTMS: deep transcranial magnetic stimulation; HF: high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; iTBS: intermittent theta-burst stimulation; LF: low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; SMD: standardized mean difference.