Skip to main content
. 2021 May 21;13(6):770. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13060770

Table 1.

Summary of the techniques presented, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages for fate studies in vitro and in vivo.

Techniques Advantages Disadvantages Experimental Type References
FC Quantitative measurements of NC/drug uptake in a cell population measuring fluorescence at single cell level. Requires fluorescence labelling.
Cannot discriminate easily between NPs.
inside or on the surface of cells.
In vitro [34,35,36,37,47]
CLSM Able to visualize the location of NCs and drugs inside cell organelles. Requires fluorescence labelling.
Can give false results due to detached dyes from NCs.
Mainly in vitro [23,24,25,26,27]
FRET Can determine the proximity of two fluorescence molecules in vitro and in vivo.
can be used for studying release of drugs or degradation of NPs
Requires labelling and sometimes complex.
Molecular design.
In vitro/in vivo [50,51]
FCS/FCCS Allows for studying diffusion of fluorescent molecules and the temporally correlate the association of labelled species.
Can be applied for studying degradation of NCs or
Drug release.
Requires fluorescence labelling.
Photobleaching can difficult measurements
In vitro [63,64,79,80]
FLIM Imaging is based on measuring lifetime of fluorescence molecules that can be traced even with low intensity. Lifetime measurements are sensitive to environmental conditions such as pH, ionic strength, temperature. Requires fluorescence labelling.
Can give false results due to detached dyes from NCs.
In vitro/in vivo [81,82,83,84,85]
Fluorescence Imaging Gives precise information about NCs/drug distribution biodistribution (in vivo). Long exposure to fluorescent light can cause bleaching.
Dye detachment can lead to a false localization of NPs or drugs.
Not quantitative.
In vivo [106,107,108]
Raman Minimal sample preparation.
Non-invasive.
Non-destructive.
Label-free manner visualization of NPs and drug in cells and tissues.
Co localization studies of NPs and drug without additional labelling.
Limited confocality.
Time consuming.
Fluorescence can interfere with measurements.
In vitro [94,96]
PET/SPECT Based on the detection of radioactive element.
Quantitative.
In vivo biodistribution of NPs/drugs can be quantitatively determined.
Requires radiolabelling nanomaterials. Can give false.
Information if radioisotopes detach.
Molecules and imaging techniques are not easily accessible.
In vivo [118,119,120,121,122,123]