Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Access. 2021 May 28;9:80066–80076. doi: 10.1109/access.2021.3084819

TABLE 3.

Comparison of wearable device characteristics.

Study Stimulati on Level Aesthetic Description Processing Requirements Mass Battery Life Calibration Requirements Other Notes
Kim et al., 2020 [18] Sensory Wristwatch-style device with disposable electrodes. Processing completed on external computer, connected via wireless transceiver. 36 g A 3-hour charge lasts approximately 20 hours. Initial tests by study personnel to correctly place electrodes and find correct stimulation amplitude. N/A
Pahwa et al., 2019 [17] and Isaacson et al., 2020 [53] Sensory Wristwatch-style device with electrodes built into wristband. On-board processing whilst stimulation occurs – data for analysis is collected wirelessly from the device whilst charging at a base station. N/A A 4 hour charge lasts for 5, 40-minute, stimulation sessions.[78] Each patient needed to be fitted with a small, medium or large wristband which is specific to R or L hand. Study personnel manually increased stimulation amplitude initially. The wristband must be replaced every 3 months.
The cost of this device is USD$3200+$157 monthly band subscription [78].

Note: N/A = not available