Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 25;70(25):916–921. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7025a3

TABLE 3. Timeliness and effectiveness of workplace investigations, by workplace prioritization* — Seattle & King County, Washington, June 15–November 15, 2020.

Features Priority, no. (row %)
p-value
Total High Medium and low
Timeliness
Interval between notification and investigation, days, median (IQR)§
2 (1–5)
2 (1–5)
3 (1–8)
0.002
Duration spent on an investigation, minutes, median (IQR)
60 (40–90)
60 (45–100)
50 (30–60)
<0.001
Effectiveness
Exposed contacts not previously elicited during patient interviews
0–1
96
60 (62.5)
36 (37.5)
0.002
≥2
95
79 (83.2)
16 (16.8)
Identified employee cases not previously linked to the workplace
0–1
452
335 (74.1)
117 (25.9)
0. 001
≥2
55
52 (94.5)
3 (5.5)
No. employee cases identified
0–1
450
350 (77.8)
100 (22.2)
<0.001
≥2 363 337 (92.8) 26 (7.2)

Abbreviation: IQR = interquartile range.

* Priority levels were assigned based on workplace features observed to be associated with increased COVID-19 spread, and workforce features associated with severe disease outcomes.

P-value comparisons using Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test to compare medians and Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test to compare categorical data. Number of workplaces varies by metric because of incomplete data.

§ Total of 1,142 workplaces.

Total of 671 workplaces.