Skip to main content
. 2021 May 12;15(5):e0009292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009292

Table 3. Predictors of intensity of hookworm infection amongst preschool-age children, school-age children, and adults in Namwera, Mangochi district, Malawi in 2018.

Characteristic Mean hookworm EPG (SD)1 Univariable analysis2 Multivariable analysis2,3
IRR (95% CI) P value Multivariable IRR (95% CI) P value
Individual factors
Sex:
Male 32 (345) 1 - - -
Female 38 (518) 1.04 (0.62–1.76) 0.87 - -
Age group:
<1 year 16 (548) 1 - 1 -
1–4 years 14 (180) 11.21 (4.35–28.90) - 21.56 (8.64–53.82) -
5–14 years 54 (512) 148.53 (60.23–366.29) <0.001 25.40 (12.66–50.98) <0.001
Currently in education:
No 50 (561) 1 - 1 -
Yes 10 (152) 0.12 (0.06–0.21) <0.001 0.23 (0.11–0.50) <0.001
Dewormed within past 12 months:
No 48 (513) 1 - 1 -
Yes 23 (411) 0.27 (0.15–0.46) <0.001 0.60 (0.35–1.02) 0.006
Household factors
Access to sanitation:
Open defecation 30 (197) 1 - - -
Unimproved 11 (73) 0.71 (0.08–6.60) - - -
Limited 56 (769) 1.13 (0.17–7.55) - - -
Basic 32 (354) 0.67 (0.10–4.29) 0.44 - -
Sanitation facility is shared:
No 31 (343) 1 - - -
Yes 54 (751) 1.58 (0.85–2.94) 0.15 - -
Access to handwashing facility:
No facility 39 (379) 1 - - -
Limited 33 (468) 0.79 (0.42–1.48) - - -
Basic 51 (720) 0.41 (0.10–1.59) 0.42 - -
Household flooring:
Natural materials 38 (456) 1 - - -
Man-made materials 26 (484) 0.50 (0.24–1.03) 0.06 - -
Socio-economic status:
Poorest (Q1) 72 (782) 1 - 1 -
Q2 30 (245) 0.47 (0.22–1.02) - 0.37 (0.18–0.79) -
Q3 33 (432) 0.51 (0.22–1.18) - 0.69 (0.32–1.52) -
Q4 37 (432) 0.57 (0.25–1.27) - 0.62 (0.29–1.34) -
Least poor (Q5) 10 (77) 0.19 (0.08–0.45) 0.005 0.29 (0.13–0.65) 0.013
Source of household income:
Ganyu4 only 50 (604) 1.07 (0.39–2.96) - - -
Farming 33 (329) 1.15 (0.41–3.20) - - -
Other informal 27 (329) 0.42 (0.14–1.26) - - -
Formal 27 (461) 0.19 (0.03–1.20) 0.02 - -
Highest education level of any adult household member:
No education 45 (416) 1 - 1 -
Primary incomplete 34 (467) 0.48 (0.26–0.87) - 0.74 (0.42–1.30) -
Primary complete or higher 29 (507) 0.26 (0.11–0.60) 0.005 0.46 (0.21–0.97) 0.12
Household size:
# household members - 0.83 (0.74–0.92) 0.001 - -
Environmental factors
Aridity:
Semi-arid 20 (300) 1 - - -
Dry sub-humid 45 (534) 2.52 (1.09–5.82) 0.03 - -
Elevation:
Mean, SD - 1.007 (1.001–1.011) 0.014 - -
Sand fraction:
Mean, SD - 0.91 (0.86–0.97) 0.002 0.91 (0.85–0.96) 0.001
Population density within 1km
<50 7 (54) 1 - - -
50–249 41 (456) 7.22 (1.47–35.38) - - -
>249 33 (475) 4.44 (0.90–21.98) 0.03 - -

16102 observations with Kato-katz result included. All variables have complete data, with the exception of age group (n = 6098), dewormed within past 12 months (n = 5939), access to handwashing facility (n = 5929), household flooring (n = 6095), source of household income (n = 5654) and highest education level of any adult household member (n = 6072).

2Mixed effects negative binomial regression of egg counts, with quantity of stool assessed per sample included as an offset, accounting for clustering at the household, village and cluster level. Reference category is indicated by a value of [1].

35885 observations included in fully adjusted mixed effects negative binomial regression model.

4Casual off-own-farm labour (e.g. weeding or ridging).

Acronyms: CI = Confidence interval, EPG = Eggs per gram, IRR = Incidence rate ratio, SD = Standard deviation.