Table 6.

Comparison between the Measures Evaluated by the Experts and a Computer using the Proposed Method

Measures	Method	Specialist	t*	ρ’
LVBL	3887.91 ± 1214.80	–	–	–
LVLL	2044.44 ± 572.04	–	–	–
LVRL	1843.46 ± 647.00	–	–	–
LesVBL	383.67 ± 429.18	460.42 ± 562.55	1.38	0.23
LesVLL	207.31 ± 153.84	242.44 ± 197.83	1.85	0.12
LesVRL	176.36 ± 276.00	217.98 ± 366.70	1.11	0.32
GgVBL	377.82 ± 420.56	455.60 ± 557.66	1.36	0.23
GgVLL	203.52 ± 149.51	238.58 ± 194.49	1.81	0.13
GgVRL	174.30 ± 271.79	217.02 ± 365.31	1.10	0.32
CdVBL	5.85 ± 9.09	4.82 ± 5.31	−0.64	0.55
CdVLL	3.79 ± 4.99	3.86 ± 4.08	0.15	0.89
CdVRL	2.06 ± 4.24	0.96 ± 1.44	−0.94	0.39
PggLesBL	98.37 ± 1.59	98.32 ± 1.74	−0.16	0.88
PggLesLL	98.20 ± 1.70	98.08 ± 1.81	−0.40	0.71
PggLesRL	99.36 ± 0.70	83.01 ± 40.67	−0.98	0.37
PcdLesBL	1.63 ± 1.59	1.68 ± 1.74	0.16	0.88
PcdLesLL	1.80 ± 1.70	1.92 ± 1.81	0.40	0.71
PcdLesRL	0.64 ± 0.70	0.33 ± 0.34	−1.05	0.34
PlesLBL	10.80 ± 11.90	12.78 ± 15.34	1.33	0.24
PlesLLL	10.63 ± 7.78	12.23 ± 9.76	1.75	0.14
PlesLRL	11.25 ± 16.83	13.73 ± 22.04	1.11	0.32
PggLBL	10.63 ± 11.68	12.64 ± 15.22	1.31	0.25
PggLLL	10.43 ± 7.59	12.03 ± 9.61	1.71	0.15
PggLRL	11.12 ± 16.58	13.66 ± 21.95	1.11	0.32
PcdLBL	0.17 ± 0.24	0.14 ± 0.14	0.16	0.88
PcdLLL	0.20 ± 0.24	0.20 ± 0.20	0.40	0.71
PcdLRL	0.13 ± 0.25	0.07 ± 0.09	−1.05	0.34
LesDBL	−536.59 ± 95.98	−545.58 ± 90.63	−1.01	0.36
LesDLL	−536.70 ± 90.60	−544.33 ± 87.45	−0.74	0.49
LesDRL	−586.23 ± 108.19	−500.26 ± 262.56	0.70	0.51
GgDBL	−545.47 ± 90.32	−555.22 ± 85.98	−1.30	0.25
GgDLL	−546.58 ± 84.10	−555.40 ± 81.83	−0.99	0.37
GgDRL	−589.75 ± 104.94	−502.28 ± 263.18	0.72	0.51
CdDBL	48.34 ± 21.37	71.67 ± 36.28	1.71	0.15
CdDLL	48.37 ± 21.64	73.37 ± 39.60	1.66	0.16
CdDRL	30.50 ± 26.09	54.02 ± 40.98	1.76	0.14