Skip to main content
. 2021 May 24;9(6):624. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060624

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies in the systematic review.

Source Method Setting, Origin Participant
Characteristics
Interventions/
Intervention Period
Control Outcomes Quality
Assessment *
Bannerman and McDermott (2011) [15] Observational
Cross-sectional
3 LTCs
Scotland
Residents >60 y
Ex: Nil by mouth, receiving artificial nutritional support, fluid restriction, acutely unwell, palliative
Mean age (y) 88.1 ± 5.4
Texture C—Thicker pureed: n = 11
Texture D—Minced/moist: n = 4
[UK national descriptors 2009]
Standard diet
n = 15
-Weight comparison
-Nutritional status
Neutral
Cassen et al. (1996) [47] Pre-post
Experimental
16 days
LTC
US
All residents consumed pureed diet
Ex: Discharged or passed away
3D shaped pureed diet
n = 18
Unshaped pureed diet
n = 18
-Mealtime satisfaction (survey and staff report)
-Cost
Neutral
Cassen et al. (1996) [47] Follow-up study Cross-over
cohort
12 m
LTC
US
Residents consumed pureed diet for ≥1 m 6 m of 3D shaped pureed diet
n = 13
Unshaped pureed diet
n = 24
-Weight change Neutral
Espinosa-Val et al. (2020) [43] Prospective quasi-experimental Hospital
Spain
Dementia patients >18 y discharged from hospital
Mean age (y) 84.1 ± 7.8
18 m follow up with recommendation and advice provided to family/caregivers On admission
n = 219
Standard n = 1
Easy mastication diet n = 117
Blended diet n = 88
Mixed diet n = 13
-Nutritional status Neutral
Farrer et al. (2016) [48] Pre-post
Experimental
2 weeks
Hospital, Australia Patients >18 y consuming pureed diet, medically stable and able to communicate Moulded pureed diet (Texture C)
n = 7
Unmoulded pureed diet (Texture C) n = 13 -Mealtime satisfaction (survey) Neutral
Garon et al. (1997) [49] RCT
1 year
Hospital stroke rehabilitation
UK
Stroke patients with previously identified thin fluid aspiration by videofluoroscopy
Mean age (y) 76.8
TFs + free access of water
n = 10
TFs only
n = 10
-Mealtime satisfaction (survey) Positive
Gellrich et al. (2015) [50] Observational Retrospective 38 clinics
Germany/Austria/Switzerland
Patients with oral cancer
n = 1526
Liquid, mashed Standard diet -Weight change Neutral
Germain et al. (2006) [51] RCT
12 weeks
LTC
Canada
Residents aged 65–90 y admitted ≥3 m and had >7.5% weight loss in the last 3 m or BMI < 24 with dysphagia evaluated by RIC tool (Alzheimer’s n = 8, dementia n = 6, stroke n = 2, Parkinson’s n = 1)
Ex. Cancer, chronic intestinal disease, terminally ill patients
Mean age (y) 59
Shaped minced, minced/pureed or pureed diet and consistency-controlled TFs using Bostwick consistometer (nectar, honey, pudding)
n = 9
Unshaped minced-70, minced-3 or pureed diet and uncontrolled honey-level TF (consistency not systematically controlled) n = 8 -Weight change Neutral
Higashiguchi (2013) [52] Experimental
Cohort
7 days
17 hospitals/LTCs
Japan
Inpatient and residents on TMDs with inadequate consumption (stroke n = 19, cancer n = 9, heart failure n = 7, fracture n = 5, dehydration n = 4, pressure ulcers, n = 3, pneumonia n = 2, anaemia n = 2, COPD n = 2, dementia n = 2, diabetes n = 1, Parkinson’s n = 1, other n = 17, none n = 2)
(require total meal assistance n = 17, partial n = 6, none = 34)
Mean age (y) 81.6 ± 9.3
3 days of nutrient-dense (enzyme-infused) TMDs nutrients were not diluted, and volume not increased n = 57 4 days of unmodified TMDs -Mealtime satisfaction (Survey) Positive
Karagiannis et al. (2011) [23] RCT
8 days
Hospital subacute units
Australia
Patients ≥18 y aspirated on thin liquids with prescription of modified or TF diet by SLTs without chronic respiratory conditions or prior tracheostomy
Mean age (y) 79.5
TMDs (puree; minced; soft/minced) + TF (honey; pudding; nectar) + free access of water n = 13 TMDs + TF n = 5 -Mealtime satisfaction (survey) Positive
Keller et al. (2012) [53] Pre-post
Experimental
9 m
Hospital and LTC
Canada
All dysphagic residents fully consumed pureed or minced diets (stroke, Parkinson’s, dementia)
Ex. Enteral feed
Facility mean age 67 and 82 y
6 m of mix of 61% bulk and 39% shaped ready-to-use (reduced nutrients dilution and easier to chew and swallow) commercial TMDs n = 42 3 m of bulk commercial TMDs (unshaped, packaged in bulk) -Weight change Positive
Keller and Duizer (2014) [54] Observational
Interview
5 Rehabilitation and LTCs
Canada
Consumed pureed diet for ≥1 week
(stroke n = 6, delirium n = 2, spinal cord injury n = 1, diabetic coma n = 1, neck cancer n = 1, Parkinson’s n = 1, difficulty chewing/swallowing n = 3
Mean age (y) 77.3
None Commercial (and in-house made) pureed diet
n = 15
-Mealtime satisfaction (interview) Neutral
Kennewell and Kokkinakos (2007) [55] Observational Cross-sectional 2 hospitals
Australia
Dysphagic patients Infant-cereal fortified minced/pureed diets
n = 17
Unfortified
pureed diets
-Mealtime satisfaction (interview)
-Cost
Neutral
Konishi and Kakimoto (2020) [56] Observational Cross-sectional LTC
Japan
Older dementia residents had been admitted to a LTC between 2016–2019
Mean age (y) 87.9
Soft, n = 34
Chopped, n = 28
Blended, n = 9
Standard diet, n = 52 -Weight Neutral
Maeda et al. (2019) [46] Retrospective Observational Hospital
Japan
≥65 y admitted to an academic hospital during 2017–2018 with complete nutritional screening
Mean age (y) 75.9 ± 7.0
TMDs, n = 110 Standard, n = 3484 -Weight
-Nutritional status
Neutral
Massoulard et al. (2011) [17] Observational Cross-sectional 4 LTCs
France
All residents with chewing or swallowing difficulties
Mean age (y) 85.8 ± 9.3
Chopped, n = 12
Mixed, n = 26
Standard diet,
n = 49
-Weight comparison
-Nutritional status
Neutral
Martín et al. (2018) [42] Quasi-experimental
6 months
Hospital
Spain
Acute geriatric unit patients ≥70 y diagnosed with OD during hospitalisation by nurses using volume-viscosity swallow test
Mean age (y) 84.6 ± 5.5
14-day menus of TMDs (texture E or C) with TFs (nectar or pudding); ONS for malnourished or patients at risk of malnutrition; oral health recommendations
n = 62
Standard hospitalisation recommendations, which were not applied systematically nor in a standardised individualised application n = 124 -Weight change
-Nutritional status
Positive
Miles et al. (2019) [44] Observational Cross-sectional 12 LTCs
New Zealand
Residents consuming > 3 servings/day of commercial TMDs (dementia n = 37, cognitive impairment n = 65, brain injury n = 25, progressive neurological disease n = 9)
Mean age (y) 85 ± 7.7
None Commercial fortified TMDs and TFs n = 67 -Weight comparison
-Nutritional status
-Mealtime satisfaction (interview)
Neutral
Okabe et al. (2016) [57] Observational Cohort with 1-year follow up 2 mid-sized cities
Japan
≥60 y living at home or using in-home nursing care without malnutrition None Minced/pureed/mixed
n = 339
-Nutritional status Neutral
Ott et al. (2019) [58] Pre-post Experimental
12 weeks
2 LTCs, Germany Residents diagnosed with chewing or swallowing receiving TMDs regularly (all participants had cognition impairment)
Mean age (y) 86.5 ± 7.4
6 weeks of usual TMDs (completely pureed or partial soft food)
n = 16
6 weeks of one level of reshaped TMDs and enriched with 600 kcal energy and 30 g protein
n = 16
-Weight change
-Mealtime satisfaction (interview)
Neutral
Reyes-Torres et al. (2019) [37] RCT
12 weeks
National Institute,
Brazil
≥65 y with a caregiver and a confirmed diagnosis of oropharyngeal dysphagia, and consumed TMDs and TFs (evaluated by V-VST and EAT by dietitians)
Mean age (y) 76
Consistency-modified and standardised TMDs and nectar or pudding level TFs (measured with Brookfield viscometer) n = 20 Unmodified pureed diet with one viscosity of TFs (consistency not systematically controlled) n = 20 -Weight change
-Handgrip
-Nutritional status
Positive
Shimizu et al. (2018) [59] Retrospective Cross-sectional Hospital rehabilitation ward,
Japan
≥65 y patients
Ex. Tube feeding, parenteral nutrition, history of stroke, neurodegenerative disease
Mean age (y) 80.6 ± 7.5
TMDs, n = 22 Standard diet, n = 123 -Weight
-Nutritional status
Shimizu et al. (2020) [39] Retrospective Cohort 7 rehabilitation facilities, Japan ≥65 y with pneumonia enrolled in rehabilitation facilities with record of malnutrition screening at admission and discharge
Mean age (y) 82.9 ± 9.8
Providing multiple TMD stage ≥ 6
n = 109
Providing TMD stage < 6
n = 109
-Weight
-Nutritional status change
Neutral
Vucea et al. (2019) [45] Observational
Cross-sectional
32 LTCs, Canada Randomly recruited residents > 65 y admitted for ≥1 m
Mean age (y) 86.8 ± 7.8
TMDs
Bite-sized, n = 91
Minced, n = 139
Pureed, n = 68
Standard diet, n = 338 -Nutritional status Positive
Welch et al.
(1991) [60]
Pre-post
Experimental
6 m
LTC
US
Residents consumed pureed diet and weighed below average or serum albumin/transferrin levels below normal values (identified from medical records)
Mean age (y) 81
Pureed diets with fortified high-fibre cereals and commercial
supplements
n = 15
Pureed diets with unfortified cereals -Weight change Neutral
Wright et al. (2005) [36] Observational
Cross-sectional
Hospital elderly and neurology wards
UK
All medically stable patients consumed TMDs or standard diet (reasons for TMDs: 80% dysphagia, 20% poor dental state; stroke n = 19, fall n = 8, other n = 3)
Mean age (y) 81.5
Texture B—Smooth pureed, n = 10
Texture D—Minced/mashed, n = 9
Texture E—Soft, n = 11
(UK national descriptors, 2002)
Standard diet, n = 25 -Weight comparison Neutral
Zanini et al. (2017) [41] Pre-post experimental
6 m
20 LTCs
Italy
Dysphagic residents >65 y with low comorbidity levels (diagnosed by a physician or reported in medical records)
Mean age (y) 79.72 ± 12.31
6 m of personal-modified levels of density, viscosity, texture and particle size TMDs
n = 401
6 m of unmodified TMDs -Weight change
-Nutritional status
-Mealtime satisfaction (EdFED)
Positive

Note. RCT—randomized control trial; Ex.—exclusions; BMI—body mass index; LTC—long-term care; y—years old; TMD—texture-modified diet; TF—thickened fluids; RIC tool—Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Clinical Evaluation Dysphagia; SLT—speech-language therapist; ONS—oral nutrition supplement. m—months. * Quality of the study was assessed using Quality Criteria Checklist (QCC). Positive studies were identified as clearly addressed issues of criteria, bias, generalisability, data collection and analysis. Neutral studies were indicated as neither exceptionally strong nor exceptionally week.