Table 1.
Source | Method | Setting, Origin | Participant Characteristics |
Interventions/ Intervention Period |
Control | Outcomes | Quality Assessment * |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bannerman and McDermott (2011) [15] | Observational Cross-sectional |
3 LTCs Scotland |
Residents >60 y Ex: Nil by mouth, receiving artificial nutritional support, fluid restriction, acutely unwell, palliative Mean age (y) 88.1 ± 5.4 |
Texture C—Thicker pureed: n = 11 Texture D—Minced/moist: n = 4 [UK national descriptors 2009] |
Standard diet n = 15 |
-Weight comparison -Nutritional status |
Neutral |
Cassen et al. (1996) [47] | Pre-post Experimental 16 days |
LTC US |
All residents consumed pureed diet Ex: Discharged or passed away |
3D shaped pureed diet n = 18 |
Unshaped pureed diet n = 18 |
-Mealtime satisfaction (survey and staff report) -Cost |
Neutral |
Cassen et al. (1996) [47] Follow-up study | Cross-over cohort 12 m |
LTC US |
Residents consumed pureed diet for ≥1 m | 6 m of 3D shaped pureed diet n = 13 |
Unshaped pureed diet n = 24 |
-Weight change | Neutral |
Espinosa-Val et al. (2020) [43] | Prospective quasi-experimental | Hospital Spain |
Dementia patients >18 y discharged from hospital Mean age (y) 84.1 ± 7.8 |
18 m follow up with recommendation and advice provided to family/caregivers | On admission n = 219 Standard n = 1 Easy mastication diet n = 117 Blended diet n = 88 Mixed diet n = 13 |
-Nutritional status | Neutral |
Farrer et al. (2016) [48] | Pre-post Experimental 2 weeks |
Hospital, Australia | Patients >18 y consuming pureed diet, medically stable and able to communicate | Moulded pureed diet (Texture C) n = 7 |
Unmoulded pureed diet (Texture C) n = 13 | -Mealtime satisfaction (survey) | Neutral |
Garon et al. (1997) [49] | RCT 1 year |
Hospital stroke rehabilitation UK |
Stroke patients with previously identified thin fluid aspiration by videofluoroscopy Mean age (y) 76.8 |
TFs + free access of water n = 10 |
TFs only n = 10 |
-Mealtime satisfaction (survey) | Positive |
Gellrich et al. (2015) [50] | Observational Retrospective | 38 clinics Germany/Austria/Switzerland |
Patients with oral cancer n = 1526 |
Liquid, mashed | Standard diet | -Weight change | Neutral |
Germain et al. (2006) [51] | RCT 12 weeks |
LTC Canada |
Residents aged 65–90 y admitted ≥3 m and had >7.5% weight loss in the last 3 m or BMI < 24 with dysphagia evaluated by RIC tool (Alzheimer’s n = 8, dementia n = 6, stroke n = 2, Parkinson’s n = 1) Ex. Cancer, chronic intestinal disease, terminally ill patients Mean age (y) 59 |
Shaped minced, minced/pureed or pureed diet and consistency-controlled TFs using Bostwick consistometer (nectar, honey, pudding) n = 9 |
Unshaped minced-70, minced-3 or pureed diet and uncontrolled honey-level TF (consistency not systematically controlled) n = 8 | -Weight change | Neutral |
Higashiguchi (2013) [52] | Experimental Cohort 7 days |
17 hospitals/LTCs Japan |
Inpatient and residents on TMDs with inadequate consumption (stroke n = 19, cancer n = 9, heart failure n = 7, fracture n = 5, dehydration n = 4, pressure ulcers, n = 3, pneumonia n = 2, anaemia n = 2, COPD n = 2, dementia n = 2, diabetes n = 1, Parkinson’s n = 1, other n = 17, none n = 2) (require total meal assistance n = 17, partial n = 6, none = 34) Mean age (y) 81.6 ± 9.3 |
3 days of nutrient-dense (enzyme-infused) TMDs nutrients were not diluted, and volume not increased n = 57 | 4 days of unmodified TMDs | -Mealtime satisfaction (Survey) | Positive |
Karagiannis et al. (2011) [23] | RCT 8 days |
Hospital subacute units Australia |
Patients ≥18 y aspirated on thin liquids with prescription of modified or TF diet by SLTs without chronic respiratory conditions or prior tracheostomy Mean age (y) 79.5 |
TMDs (puree; minced; soft/minced) + TF (honey; pudding; nectar) + free access of water n = 13 | TMDs + TF n = 5 | -Mealtime satisfaction (survey) | Positive |
Keller et al. (2012) [53] | Pre-post Experimental 9 m |
Hospital and LTC Canada |
All dysphagic residents fully consumed pureed or minced diets (stroke, Parkinson’s, dementia) Ex. Enteral feed Facility mean age 67 and 82 y |
6 m of mix of 61% bulk and 39% shaped ready-to-use (reduced nutrients dilution and easier to chew and swallow) commercial TMDs n = 42 | 3 m of bulk commercial TMDs (unshaped, packaged in bulk) | -Weight change | Positive |
Keller and Duizer (2014) [54] | Observational Interview |
5 Rehabilitation and LTCs Canada |
Consumed pureed diet for ≥1 week (stroke n = 6, delirium n = 2, spinal cord injury n = 1, diabetic coma n = 1, neck cancer n = 1, Parkinson’s n = 1, difficulty chewing/swallowing n = 3 Mean age (y) 77.3 |
None | Commercial (and in-house made) pureed diet n = 15 |
-Mealtime satisfaction (interview) | Neutral |
Kennewell and Kokkinakos (2007) [55] | Observational Cross-sectional | 2 hospitals Australia |
Dysphagic patients | Infant-cereal fortified minced/pureed diets n = 17 |
Unfortified pureed diets |
-Mealtime satisfaction (interview) -Cost |
Neutral |
Konishi and Kakimoto (2020) [56] | Observational Cross-sectional | LTC Japan |
Older dementia residents had been admitted to a LTC between 2016–2019 Mean age (y) 87.9 |
Soft, n = 34 Chopped, n = 28 Blended, n = 9 |
Standard diet, n = 52 | -Weight | Neutral |
Maeda et al. (2019) [46] | Retrospective Observational | Hospital Japan |
≥65 y admitted to an academic hospital during 2017–2018 with complete nutritional screening Mean age (y) 75.9 ± 7.0 |
TMDs, n = 110 | Standard, n = 3484 | -Weight -Nutritional status |
Neutral |
Massoulard et al. (2011) [17] | Observational Cross-sectional | 4 LTCs France |
All residents with chewing or swallowing difficulties Mean age (y) 85.8 ± 9.3 |
Chopped, n = 12 Mixed, n = 26 |
Standard diet, n = 49 |
-Weight comparison -Nutritional status |
Neutral |
Martín et al. (2018) [42] | Quasi-experimental 6 months |
Hospital Spain |
Acute geriatric unit patients ≥70 y diagnosed with OD during hospitalisation by nurses using volume-viscosity swallow test Mean age (y) 84.6 ± 5.5 |
14-day menus of TMDs (texture E or C) with TFs (nectar or pudding); ONS for malnourished or patients at risk of malnutrition; oral health recommendations n = 62 |
Standard hospitalisation recommendations, which were not applied systematically nor in a standardised individualised application n = 124 | -Weight change -Nutritional status |
Positive |
Miles et al. (2019) [44] | Observational Cross-sectional | 12 LTCs New Zealand |
Residents consuming > 3 servings/day of commercial TMDs (dementia n = 37, cognitive impairment n = 65, brain injury n = 25, progressive neurological disease n = 9) Mean age (y) 85 ± 7.7 |
None | Commercial fortified TMDs and TFs n = 67 | -Weight comparison -Nutritional status -Mealtime satisfaction (interview) |
Neutral |
Okabe et al. (2016) [57] | Observational Cohort with 1-year follow up | 2 mid-sized cities Japan |
≥60 y living at home or using in-home nursing care without malnutrition | None | Minced/pureed/mixed n = 339 |
-Nutritional status | Neutral |
Ott et al. (2019) [58] | Pre-post Experimental 12 weeks |
2 LTCs, Germany | Residents diagnosed with chewing or swallowing receiving TMDs regularly (all participants had cognition impairment) Mean age (y) 86.5 ± 7.4 |
6 weeks of usual TMDs (completely pureed or partial soft food) n = 16 |
6 weeks of one level of reshaped TMDs and enriched with 600 kcal energy and 30 g protein n = 16 |
-Weight change -Mealtime satisfaction (interview) |
Neutral |
Reyes-Torres et al. (2019) [37] | RCT 12 weeks |
National Institute, Brazil |
≥65 y with a caregiver and a confirmed diagnosis of oropharyngeal dysphagia, and consumed TMDs and TFs (evaluated by V-VST and EAT by dietitians) Mean age (y) 76 |
Consistency-modified and standardised TMDs and nectar or pudding level TFs (measured with Brookfield viscometer) n = 20 | Unmodified pureed diet with one viscosity of TFs (consistency not systematically controlled) n = 20 | -Weight change -Handgrip -Nutritional status |
Positive |
Shimizu et al. (2018) [59] | Retrospective Cross-sectional | Hospital rehabilitation ward, Japan |
≥65 y patients Ex. Tube feeding, parenteral nutrition, history of stroke, neurodegenerative disease Mean age (y) 80.6 ± 7.5 |
TMDs, n = 22 | Standard diet, n = 123 | -Weight -Nutritional status |
|
Shimizu et al. (2020) [39] | Retrospective Cohort | 7 rehabilitation facilities, Japan | ≥65 y with pneumonia enrolled in rehabilitation facilities with record of malnutrition screening at admission and discharge Mean age (y) 82.9 ± 9.8 |
Providing multiple TMD stage ≥ 6 n = 109 |
Providing TMD stage < 6 n = 109 |
-Weight -Nutritional status change |
Neutral |
Vucea et al. (2019) [45] | Observational Cross-sectional |
32 LTCs, Canada | Randomly recruited residents > 65 y admitted for ≥1 m Mean age (y) 86.8 ± 7.8 |
TMDs Bite-sized, n = 91 Minced, n = 139 Pureed, n = 68 |
Standard diet, n = 338 | -Nutritional status | Positive |
Welch et al. (1991) [60] |
Pre-post Experimental 6 m |
LTC US |
Residents consumed pureed diet and weighed below average or serum albumin/transferrin levels below normal values (identified from medical records) Mean age (y) 81 |
Pureed diets with fortified high-fibre cereals and commercial supplements n = 15 |
Pureed diets with unfortified cereals | -Weight change | Neutral |
Wright et al. (2005) [36] | Observational Cross-sectional |
Hospital elderly and neurology wards UK |
All medically stable patients consumed TMDs or standard diet (reasons for TMDs: 80% dysphagia, 20% poor dental state; stroke n = 19, fall n = 8, other n = 3) Mean age (y) 81.5 |
Texture B—Smooth pureed, n = 10 Texture D—Minced/mashed, n = 9 Texture E—Soft, n = 11 (UK national descriptors, 2002) |
Standard diet, n = 25 | -Weight comparison | Neutral |
Zanini et al. (2017) [41] | Pre-post experimental 6 m |
20 LTCs Italy |
Dysphagic residents >65 y with low comorbidity levels (diagnosed by a physician or reported in medical records) Mean age (y) 79.72 ± 12.31 |
6 m of personal-modified levels of density, viscosity, texture and particle size TMDs n = 401 |
6 m of unmodified TMDs | -Weight change -Nutritional status -Mealtime satisfaction (EdFED) |
Positive |
Note. RCT—randomized control trial; Ex.—exclusions; BMI—body mass index; LTC—long-term care; y—years old; TMD—texture-modified diet; TF—thickened fluids; RIC tool—Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Clinical Evaluation Dysphagia; SLT—speech-language therapist; ONS—oral nutrition supplement. m—months. * Quality of the study was assessed using Quality Criteria Checklist (QCC). Positive studies were identified as clearly addressed issues of criteria, bias, generalisability, data collection and analysis. Neutral studies were indicated as neither exceptionally strong nor exceptionally week.