Table 3.

Simulation results for each treatment combination.

Factor A	Factor B	Factor C	${\mathit{Y}}_1$	${\mathit{Y}}_2$	${\mathit{Y}}_3$	${\mathit{Y}}_4$	${\mathit{Y}}_5$
20%	1	20%	171.6	391.0	17,293.4	3516.6	80.8
20%	1	40%	175.4	385.6	17,162.8	3322.8	82.8
20%	1	60%	180.8	368.0	16,828.2	3160.2	83.2
20%	2	20%	176.0	379.6	17,445.2	3581.0	81.0
20%	2	40%	166.2	370.8	17,380.8	3497.8	82.0
20%	2	60%	171.2	382.4	17,129.6	3315.6	81.0
20%	3	20%	169.8	374.0	17,618.8	3784.6	76.6
20%	3	40%	168.6	393.2	17,446.2	3593.8	77.6
20%	3	60%	178.6	394.0	17,315.0	3433.0	80.0
40%	1	20%	192.4	360.2	15,946.8	2694.4	86.2
40%	1	40%	216.0	339.0	15,380.4	2401.4	96.4
40%	1	60%	243.2	331.2	14,575.8	1984.4	102.0
40%	2	20%	173.6	364.2	16,452.6	2993.2	81.4
40%	2	40%	200.0	332.6	15,962.8	2698.2	88.4
40%	2	60%	214.2	335.6	15,523.8	2471.6	93.2
40%	3	20%	177.4	376.0	17,026.0	3338.2	80.0
40%	3	40%	184.6	363.4	16,529.2	2921.2	85.6
40%	3	60%	209.6	348.2	16,164.6	2739.0	89.0
60%	1	20%	245.4	300.4	13,549.6	1673.4	106.4
60%	1	40%	278.6	251.6	11,818.6	1196.8	123.4
60%	1	60%	347.6	216.8	9816.0	694.0	155.0
60%	2	20%	217.4	335.6	14,964.2	2175.6	100.8
60%	2	40%	238.8	304.0	13,687.2	1764.6	105.0
60%	2	60%	278.6	264.8	12,159.6	1261.0	117.0
60%	3	20%	196.6	342.0	15,953.6	2654.6	90.6
60%	3	40%	213.8	330.2	14,991.2	2215.2	97.4
60%	3	60%	240.6	296.0	13,786.2	1722.8	105.8