Abstract
Background
Self-incompatibility (SI) systems prevent self-fertilization in several species of Poaceae, many of which are economically important forage, bioenergy and turf grasses. Self-incompatibility ensures cross-pollination and genetic diversity but restricts the ability to fix useful genetic variation. In most inbred crops it is possible to develop high-performing homozygous parental lines by self-pollination, which then enables the creation of F1 hybrid varieties with higher performance, a phenomenon known as heterosis. The inability to fully exploit heterosis in outcrossing grasses is partially responsible for lower levels of improvement in breeding programmes compared with inbred crops. However, SI can be overcome in forage grasses to create self-compatible populations. This is generating interest in understanding the genetical basis of self-compatibility (SC), its significance for reproductive strategies and its exploitation for crop improvement, especially in the context of F1 hybrid breeding.
Scope
We review the literature on SI and SC in outcrossing grass species. We review the currently available genomic tools and approaches used to discover and characterize novel SC sources. We discuss opportunities barely explored for outcrossing grasses that SC facilitates. Specifically, we discuss strategies for wide SC introgression in the context of the Lolium–Festuca complex and the use of SC to develop immortalized mapping populations for the dissection of a wide range of agronomically important traits. The germplasm available is a valuable practical resource and will aid understanding the basis of inbreeding depression and hybrid vigour in key temperate forage grass species.
Conclusions
A better understanding of the genetic control of additional SC loci offers new insight into SI systems, their evolutionary origins and their reproductive significance. Heterozygous outcrossing grass species that can be readily selfed facilitate studies of heterosis. Moreover, SC introduction into a range of grass species will enable heterosis to be exploited in innovative ways in genetic improvement programmes.
Keywords: Self-compatibility, self-incompatibility, inbreeding, Poaceae, introgression, inbreeding depression, heterosis, F 1 hybrid breeding
Introduction
Self-incompatibility (SI) is the most widespread mechanism for promoting outcrossing in hermaphrodite flowering plants. Described by Charles Darwin as ‘the ability of some plants to reject their own pollen’, SI is considered the mating system of ancestral angiosperms (Allen and Hiscock, 2008). The first flowering plants retained SI to maximize cross-pollination and genetic diversity to adapt to and expand into a wide range of habitats. Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms are, in most studied cases, controlled by one highly polymorphic S locus containing at least two tightly linked genes, encoding the male and female-specific SI determinants that mediate the self/non-self-pollen recognition. If the S alleles carried by the pollen and pistil match, the pollen is recognized as ‘self’, thus preventing self-fertilization and the resulting inbreeding.
The breakdown of SI caused a change from outcrossing to self-fertilization in the evolutionary history of many flowering plants (Vekemans et al., 2014). During angiosperm evolution and expansion, SI has frequently been lost irreversibly through loss-of-function mutations (Igic et al., 2008). Self-compatibility (SC) evolved as a reproduction strategy in plants as, among other factors, a preadaptation to plant domestication (Iriondo et al., 2018). As a consequence of the high level of inbreeding resulting from self-fertilization, deleterious recessive mutations were revealed that early farmers selected against to propagate plants with favourable alleles contributing to useful traits (Abbo et al., 2012; Kantar et al., 2017).
Understanding how SC has arisen is fundamental for plant evolution, population dynamics and plant domestication studies. In practice, SC has enabled the production of superior inbred lines purged of deleterious recessive alleles. Homozygous lines from divergent backgrounds can be crossed to create F1 hybrids with increased performance, a phenomenon known as heterosis. Understanding of this phenomenon has been enhanced by the development of mapping populations consisting of homozygous lines in which combinations of alleles from the crossed parents are fixed. These lines can be propagated indefinitely as seeds.
Thus, genetic mapping and dissection of agronomic traits have been useful strategies for the development of targeted approaches to DNA marker trait selection in many inbred crops by developing durable immortalized inbred line-based genetic resources. These include recombinant inbred lines (RILs) produced through recurrent rounds of inbreeding (Burr et al., 1988) and near-isogenic lines (NILs) produced by repeated backcrosses of an RIL to another population and selfing to produce an overall homogeneous population varying in the presence of introgressed genomic segments from the initial RIL in proximity to a particular target region (Kaeppler et al., 1993). Furthermore, homozygous lines can be produced rapidly and with a substantially smaller population by using doubled haploid techniques (Guzy-Wrobelska and Szarejko, 2003). These populations cannot be produced in outcrossing species, and in grasses, such as perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), genetic mapping studies employ highly heterozygous pseudo-F1 or pseudo-F2 populations that need to be maintained clonally. This is labour-intensive and potentially compromises the genetic integrity of the population over time.
Several self-incompatible species of the Poaceae are economically valuable forage crops and represent a fundamental component in many ruminant production systems. Self-incompatibility has acted as a barrier to their improvement and forage yield advances in breeding have been small (Woodfield, 1999; Wilkins and Humphreys, 2003). Currently, because of the breeding behaviour and the self-incompatible nature of the plants, forage crop breeding is predominantly based on lengthy population improvement programmes using recurrent selection, achieving modest genetic gains compared to self-compatible crop species (Laidig et al., 2014; McDonagh et al., 2014). This might be because in outcrossing species it is extremely challenging to produce the inbred lines necessary to fully exploit heterosis. Instead, breeding activity has focused on recurrent selection, accumulating and fixing favourable genes with additive effects on desired traits in ‘synthetic’ population varieties. In such populations, although heterosis will occur at a proportion of heterozygous loci, these will continue to segregate through the breeding process despite the imposed selection. Perhaps more significantly, the maintenance of high levels of heterosis is even less likely during the process of seed multiplication, where there is no agronomic selection.
The need to accelerate breeding progress in forage grasses for traits such as biomass and seed yield, nutritional quality and disease resistance is stimulating grass breeders to develop hybrid breeding technologies as an alternative to recurrent population selection strategies. For this reason, overcoming SI and exploiting SC to breed forage grasses as an inbred line-based crop is gaining interest (Do Canto et al., 2016; Herridge et al., 2019).
With SC made available in inherently highly heterozygous self-incompatible plant populations, there are opportunities to discover a potentially greater pool of novel genomic regions and underlying candidate genes associated with heterotic responses than would be found in less genetically diverse inbred crop species. Such associations can then be practically exploited in the same way that variation in immortalized populations has enabled the genetic dissection of various traits in self-compatible species and a genomic marker-assisted approach to F1 hybrid plant breeding in several inbred crops (Xu et al., 2017).
Several SC sources in predominantly outcrossing and agronomically relevant grasses have been reported so far. These arise mainly from spontaneous mutations at the S and/or Z loci that disrupt the initial self-/non-self-recognition between pollen and stigma. Mutations in so-called SI modifier genes can also lead to SC, by interrupting the downstream cascade triggered by the initial self-recognition response (Do Canto et al. 2016). However, a detailed molecular understanding of how SC arises, along with its systematic manipulation and introgression in a wide germplasm resource, is still limiting progress.
Here, we review the current knowledge of SI and SC in grasses and we discuss how recent developments in genomics and DNA sequencing technologies will help characterize novel SC sources in grasses. To conclude, we explore possibilities, so far considered impractical, that SC facilitates in the context of grass improvement programmes. In this final section we focus on how using SC in forage grasses will enable a greater fundamental understanding of heterosis and an ability to manipulate it in novel ways to fully exploit the genetic diversity potentially offered.
SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY IN THE GRASSES
Genetic mechanisms of SI in the angiosperms are phylogenetically diverse and often family-specific, indicating several de novo evolutionary pathways (Bateman, 1952). Physiological SI mechanisms can be classified as gametophytic or sporophytic, but the specific mechanisms, as well as the number of genetic determinants involved, vary between families. Identification of SI-determinant genes has only been achieved for SI systems controlled by a single locus, called S, such as those of the Solanaceae, Rosaceae, Plantaginaceae, Brassicaceae and Papaveraceae, discussed in detail in a recent review (Muñoz-Sanz et al., 2020). Despite the involvement of different molecular actors, the underlying genetic principles of all single-locus SI systems are similar. The S locus consists of at least two tightly linked genes that together form a non-recombining S haplotype: one gene encodes the female determinant of SI, which is expressed in the pistil, and another gene encodes the male determinant of SI, which is expressed in the pollen (gametophytically controlled SI) or in tapetal cells (sporophytically controlled SI). In a self-pollination event, the products of male and female determinants interact with each other and trigger the pollen inhibition response that leads to SI (Brennan et al., 2011).
In comparison with single-locus SI systems, the SI systems under the control of more than one locus are considerably more challenging to study, the additional SI loci adding a level of complexity to the understanding of pollen–stigma interactions. Known multi-locus SI systems are controlled by two loci in Poaceae (Hayman, 1956; Lundqvist, 1956), three loci in buttercup (Ranunculus spp.) (Lundqvist et al., 1973; Lundqvist, 1990) and four loci in common beet (Beta vulgaris) (Lundqvist et al., 1973) and martagon lily (Lilium martagon) (Lundqvist, 1991). Of these, the SI system of the grass family is the best documented.
The gametophytic SI system of the Poaceae is controlled by two independent loci, designated S and Z, which are located on chromosomes 1 and 2, respectively (Thorogood et al., 2002). Self-fertilization is prevented when identical S and Z haplotypes are shared by both pollen and stigma. This two-locus mechanism was first reported over 60 years ago in sunolgrass (Phalaris coerulescens) (Hayman, 1956) and rye (Secale cereale) (Lundqvist, 1956), later being confirmed in L. perenne (Cornish et al., 1979). Despite several efforts to identify the SI-determinant genes, their identity and function are yet to be fully elucidated. However, considerable progress has been made in recent years. Through a combination of fine mapping, genome sequencing, transcriptome analysis and comparative sequence analysis, Manzanares et al. (2016a) identified and evaluated potential candidate genes for the L. perenne pollen S-locus component. Three candidate genes segregated with the S locus and were also overexpressed in reproductive tissues, with two upregulated in stigma tissue and a single gene upregulated in pollen. The gene encoding a protein (LpSDUF247) containing the DUF247 domain of unknown function appeared to be the most likely candidate for the pollen SI determinant as it possessed the high level of allelic variability expected of an SI determinant gene affected by frequency-dependent selection (Fearon et al., 1994). LpSDUF247 was predicted to have a C-terminal transmembrane helix and an extracellular domain, suggesting that it may function as a ligand on the pollen surface (Manzanares et al., 2016a). The variability between alleles was not evenly distributed across the protein sequence, with the region from the transmembrane domain to the C-terminus being more conserved. In addition, all self-compatible grass species for which LpSDUF247 orthologue sequence information was available possessed either premature stop codon mutations or large deletions in the predicted protein sequence (Manzanares et al., 2016a). However, no genes were proposed as a candidate for the stigma S determinant, possibly because a gap in the derived sequence of the S locus identified might have prevented its identification.
Expression profiling and allelic diversity assessment were also employed by Shinozuka et al. (2010) in an attempt to identify candidate genes for the L. perenne Z locus. Two genes were identified as plausible candidates for either the pollen or stigma determinants. Interestingly, one of these was a gene encoding a protein containing a DUF247 domain (LpDUF247) similar to the S locus-linked LpSDUF247 gene, with the other candidate gene encoding either a putative tetratricopeptide repeat-like domain-containing protein or a ubiquitin-specific protease (LpTC116908). These findings lend support to a hypothesis put forward by Lundqvist (1962) that the two-locus SI system in grasses originated from a duplication of an initial single SI locus. Orthologues of LpSDUF247 have also been identified in other grass species, such as wild rice (Oryza barthii) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), suggesting that this gene could function as an SI determinant throughout the Poaceae (Manzanares et al., 2016a). Although the candidate genes for the grass SI determinants here discussed have not been functionally characterized, preliminary studies found that calcium (Ca2+) signalling and protein phosphorylation are involved in the recognition and/or inhibition of incompatible pollen. Two independent expression studies found that transcripts predicted to code for proteins containing calcium-binding domains were enriched during the SI response in L. perenne and in sheepgrass (Leymus chinensis) (Yang et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2019). Moreover, Klaas et al. (2011) supported this hypothesis by showing that SI in L. perenne can be partially overcome by treating self-pollinated stigmas with chemical reagents known to affect Ca2+ channelling across membranes.
Map-based cloning and large-scale comparative genomics enabled by long-read assembly methods in combination with more targeted editing approaches will allow functional validation and confirmation of the candidate genes discussed here and provide useful insights into their molecular function in determining the SI response.
SELF-COMPATIBILITY IN THE GRASSES
A significant portion of the literature regarding the genetic causes of SC is based on evolutionary studies aiming at unravelling the origins and dynamics of the transition of outbreeding species from SI to selfing. These studies, summarized in Supplementary Data Table S1 and referenced in Supplementary Data References S1, provide information on the genetic causes of SC in known sporophytic and gametophytic SI systems. Overall, these studies demonstrate that the causes of SC can be classified into two categories. Firstly, SC can arise from inactivation and/or loss-of-function mutations at SI determinants. Secondly, there are numerous examples of SC arising from genes unlinked to the SI-determinant genes, but that can affect their expression or mediate the up- or downstream pathways involved in the SI response.
Although self-incompatible species are predominant among the Poaceae, there are a number of naturally self-compatible species (for an exhaustive list see Do Canto et al., 2016). Indications of how SC evolved in these species come from studies on darnel (Lolium temulentum), a naturally self-compatible species. By analysing SC segregation in backcrossing generations of L. temulentum–L. perenne and L. temulentum–annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) interspecific hybrids, Thorogood and Hayward (1992) proposed that SC was under the control of a single locus and was caused by a mutation at the Z locus. This was inferred from distorted segregation of the GOT/3 isozyme locus in selfed progeny of first-generation backcross plants. Information available at the time showed that the GOT/3 locus was not linked to the S locus and therefore distorted segregation was inferred to have been associated with the Z locus. Later, linkage mapping experiments located the GOT/3 locus on linkage group (LG) 3 (Jones et al., 2002), unlinked to either S or Z. However, an epistatic relationship between the S locus and a region of LG 3 that caused distorted segregation of markers, including the GOT/3 locus on LG 3 (Thorogood et al., 2002), strongly implies that SC in L. temulentum was in fact associated with the S locus. Corroboratively, Manzanares et al. (2016a) provided evidence that the orthologue of the S-locus candidate gene LpSDUF247 in L. perenne carried a frameshift mutation in L. temulentum that alters the last 24 amino acids of the C-terminus, which might fully explain the failure of the SI system in this species.
Low levels of self-fertility in individuals of self-incompatible grass species, manifest as the ability of individual plants to set small amounts of selfed seeds on panicles isolated in paper bags, were known almost a century ago (Jenkin, 1930; Beddows, 1931). Early genetic studies on the breakdown of SI in S. cereale speculated on the existence of several mutations at S and Z (Lundqvist, 1958, 1962, 1968). In these studies, SI specificity was lost in the pollen but retained in the pistils, indicating that the mutants were pollen-part mutations. Later on, genotypes carrying putative mutations at S and Z in which the recognition between pollen and stigma was disrupted were reported in Lolium species (Thorogood and Hayward, 1991), S. cereale (Fuong et al., 1993; Voylokov et al., 1998) and P. coerulescens (Hayman and Richter, 1992).
Another commonly reported route to SC in grasses is through loci unlinked to S and Z, as reported in S. cereale (Voylokov et al., 1993; Egorova et al., 2000) and L. perenne (Thorogood et al., 2005). Genes underlying these loci likely have a function in the downstream cascade following the initial pollen–stigma recognition mediated by S and Z (Do Canto et al., 2016). The most recent studies on non-S or non-Z sources of SC identified two genetically independent loci on LG 5 (Arias-Aguirre et al., 2013; Do Canto et al., 2018; Cropano et al., 2021) and LG 6 (Slatter et al., 2020) in two unrelated perennial ryegrass F2 populations segregating for SC. In both populations, using in vitro self-pollinations (Fig. 1), a similar 1:1 segregation in two phenotypic SC classes was observed: plants showing 50 % pollen compatibility, where half of the self-pollen germinated and grew a pollen tube upon contact with the stigma, and 100 % SC, where all self-pollen showed a compatible reaction. In both cases, it was concluded that SC was under the control of a single gametophytically acting pollen gene. Furthermore, Cropano et al. (2021) narrowed down the region to a 0.26-cM locus, allowing the identification of candidate genes that could be the target of functional characterization studies.
Fig. 1.
Phenotyping sc in grasses using an in vitro pollination assay. (A, b) virgin pistils are dissected from flowering heads and (c) placed on a petri dish with a medium containing agarose, sucrose and boric acid. (D) the heads are isolated in paper bags and, at the time of anthesis, they are shaken to release and collect fresh pollen. (E) the pollen is sprinkled homogeneously from the paper bags directly onto the virgin pistils. (F) at least 2 h after pollination, the stigmas (E, black arrow) are separated from the ovary (E, white arrow) and mounted on a microscope slide after staining with aniline blue solution, which stains selectively for callose visualized within pollen tube cell walls under UV light (Martin, 1959). (G) The level of pollen compatibility is assessed by observing the pollinated stigmas using UV fluorescence microscopy. In self-incompatible plants (above), self-pollen is usually bright, and a short and thickened pollen tube can be observed. In self-compatible plants (below) self-pollen grains are translucent and they can produce a bright pollen tube that grows through the stigma branches towards the style.
Disruption of SI can arise from non-genetic sources as well, including environmental factors such as temperature and humidity, leading to a condition referred to as pseudo-self-compatibility (Cornish et al., 1980; Fearon et al., 1983). The existence of genetic variation for pseudo-self-compatibility has been reported in L. perenne (Elgersma et al., 1989; Wilkins and Thorogood, 1992), but studies on its genetic regulation are lacking.
TOWARDS THE DISCOVERY AND GENE IDENTITY OF NOVEL SC SOURCES IN THE GENOMICS ERA
Identifying sources of SC is more effective with the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based technologies and reference genome assemblies of grass species (Byrne et al., 2015; Velmurugan et al., 2016; Shinozuka et al., 2017, ; Knorst et al., 2019; Copetti et al., 2021). Cost-effective and high-throughput NGS-based genotyping technologies such as genotyping-by-sequencing and chip arrays have been used in outcrossing grasses in a wide range of studies (Blackmore et al., 2015; Fè et al., 2015; Thorogood et al., 2017; Begheyn et al., 2018; Velmurugan et al., 2016, 2018; Cericola et al., 2018; Guo et al., 2018). These tools make more sophisticated approaches such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS) an attractive option for the identification of SC loci. Indeed, GWAS overcome some limitations of quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping in biparental populations, such as restricted allelic diversity and low mapping resolution, as it can be employed on multiparental populations exhibiting reduced linkage disequilibrium through accumulated historical recombination events and dense genome-wide molecular marker maps (Korte and Farlow, 2013). Performing GWAS is a suitable approach for the screening of natural populations and cultivars developed by breeders and does not require the lengthy preparation of mapping populations with controlled pedigrees. GWAS can also simultaneously identify multiple loci responsible for SC variation and provide first insights into their relationship (Thorogood et al., 2017). Self-compatibility loci unlinked to SI determinants reported so far in grasses produce a 1:1 segregation into two SC groups, as mentioned earlier. In such cases, sequencing pools of hundreds of individuals belonging to either of the two contrasting SC groups (bulk segregant analysis) might be more effective in locating the causal mutation based on differential allele frequencies. This approach led to the identification of a mutation conferring pollen-part SC in sweet cherry (Prunus avium) (Ono et al., 2018) and several loci harbouring modifier genes in Arabidopsis lyrata (Mable et al., 2017).
Identifying narrow genomic regions harbouring SC using association genetics studies relies on the effective phenotyping of large populations. Almost all studies on SC in grasses have used in vitro self-pollination to phenotype SC with high resolution and accuracy (Fig. 1). However, this technique is extremely time-consuming and is restricted by the short flowering time of the plants. A valid alternative to phenotyping assays is the analysis of segregation distortion. In plants with an SI system, the segregation of an SC gene in certain crosses can lead to segregation distortion of markers surrounding the SC causal gene. Thus, the identification of distorted regions in carefully designed mapping populations can be used to map their position in the genome. This was recently demonstrated by Slatter et al. (2020), who found that the SC QTL in L. perenne on LG 6 and LG 5 coincided with maximum marker segregation distortion. Mapping segregation distortion overcomes the dependency of in vitro pollinations on flowering and it allows the screening of larger populations to achieve higher mapping resolution.
Once forward genetic experiments have identified loci responsible for SC variation, the causal genes, often selected from a list of candidates at each locus, need to be characterized and functionally validated. One way to achieve this is by assessing the phenotype resulting from a disruptive mutation in a coding sequence. Among other methods, TILLING (targeting induced local lesions in genomes) offers a high-throughput screening of point mutations at genes of interest in populations mutagenized by chemical treatment (McCallum et al., 2000). In major crop species such as wheat (Triticum aestivum) (Slade et al., 2005), maize (Zea mays) (Till et al., 2004), pea (Pisum sativum) (Dalmais et al., 2008), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) (Piron et al., 2010), barley (Hordeum vulgare) (Gottwald et al., 2009) and others (Boualem et al., 2014), TILLING has been adopted to isolate mutants with agronomically valuable traits. A TILLING platform is available for perennial ryegrass and is currently being used for the validation of SI candidate genes identified through forward genetic screens (Manzanares et al., 2016b). The use of TILLING is especially appropriate for validating the effect of mutations on monogenic traits, such as SC, because a mutation in a gene controlling a monogenic trait will yield a readily detectable phenotype, allowing easier confirmation of its function. In addition, recent advances in genome editing through CRISPR/Cas9 and its implementation in forage grasses (Zhang et al., 2020) makes this tool an attractive alternative for achieving targeted gene inactivation of SC candidate genes to unequivocally determine their function.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF SC IN FORAGE GRASSES
In this section of the review we focus on strategies for using SC in grasses to exploit genetic diversity not normally readily available in the outcrossing grass species. Although challenging to unravel and fix, outcrossing species offer wider sources of genetic variation than inbreeding species (Hamrick and Godt, 1996).
Inbred lines and F1hybrids for plant breeding
As forage crops, species of the Poaceae family are economically important, providing feed for ~80 % of bovine milk production (Huyghe et al., 2014) and 70 % of meat production (Wilkins and Humphreys, 2003) worldwide. According to figures from the European Seed Certification Agencies Association (ESCAA) on the area utilized for the production of certified forage seeds in the European Union in 2018, species of the Poaceae are the most important (229 838 ha), together with the Fabaceae (229 878 ha). In addition, they are sown as turf grasses in stadiums and golf courses, parks and domestic lawns, where they are used for sport and recreation.
Currently, forage grasses are mainly improved as populations and released as synthetic cultivars. Cultivar development begins with the evaluation of widely spaced plants for traits such as flowering time, plant habit, disease resistance, abiotic stress tolerance and nutritive value. Selected plants are then polycrossed to create a base population, which is highly heterozygous and heterogeneous. As some traits, notably biomass, cannot reliably be evaluated in individual spaced plants, synthetic populations are produced by crossing selected individuals to produce seed for plot trials that are more representative of grass pastures. Individual full- or half-sib family progeny seeds are collected from polycrossed plants and evaluated in plot trials. Only families from the best progeny plots and those that indicate the best performance when put together (combining ability) proceed to the next generation. Rounds of recurrent phenotypic selection are made to gradually increase performance and at the same time populations are tested for uniformity. When the desired levels of performance and uniformity are reached the population is then intermated in isolation from possible contaminant pollen from outside sources for several generations to produce commercial quantities of seed. Levels of genetic improvement in forage grass yield have been noticeably modest in comparison with other crops (Pembleton et al., 2015). Recent estimates indicated an annual genetic gain for biomass yield of 0.45 % in L. perenne and from 0.27 to 0.37 % for L. multiflorum, amongst the lowest compared with other major crops (Laidig et al., 2014; McDonagh et al., 2014), including forage Z. mays (Taube et al., 2020), where hybrid production technologies have been applied. To redress this deficiency, genomic selection technologies, developed in animal breeding, are currently being applied to recurrent selection programmes of outbreeding temperate forage grasses, most recently by Danish (Esfandyari et al., 2020), French/Belgian (Keep et al., 2020), New Zealand (Arojju et al., 2020), Australian (Jighly et al., 2019) and UK (Grinberg et al., 2016) research groups and breeding companies. Four reviews of the technology applied to outcrossing grasses have been published (Hayes et al., 2013; Yabe et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2014; Talukder and Saha, 2017). Regardless of how successful genomic selection proves to be, improvement is still restricted largely to the additive component of genetic variation, thus limiting potential gains. We suggest that an additional approach to forage grass breeding programmes, whereby the reproductive system is altered to facilitate inbred line production and the creation of hybrids, is required to maximally exploit genetic variation. The primary constraint limiting genetic gain in grasses is the inability to develop hybrid breeding strategies that effectively exploit heterosis (Brummer et al., 2009). To boost the heterotic effect, the parents should be genetically distant to maximze the heterotic effect, and highly homozygous to restore heterozygosity and homogeneity in the F1 hybrid. Since its first implementation in Z. mays, F1 hybrid breeding has revolutionized grain yield during the 20th century in a wide range of crops. The extraordinary performance of early corn F1 hybrid varieties compared with synthetic varieties has stimulated forage grass breeders to find ways to develop hybrid forages.
Although not yet used on a commercial scale, hybrid schemes based on the intercrossing of two synthetic populations have been proposed for L. perenne (Foster, 1971b), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) (Martinez-Reyna and Vogel, 2008) and other forage crop species (Brummer, 1999). These are assumed to produce ‘chance’ hybrid populations, where up to half of the progeny derives from a direct hybridization of the two populations. More sophisticated strategies were also proposed based on selective restriction of SI diversity (England, 1974; Posselt, 1993; Pembleton et al., 2015) and on within-population crossing using cytoplasmic male-sterile plants (Rouwendal et al., 1992; McDermott et al., 2008; Islam et al., 2014; Vogt et al., 2020). These are predicted to substantially increase the proportion of hybrid seed produced.
The systematic development and use of self-compatible germplasm expands the possible hybrid breeding strategies available for forage grasses. Specifically, it offers the opportunity to design inbred line-based F1 hybrid breeding strategies by producing elite homozygous parental lines capturing favourable genetic diversity. These lines can be crossed for testing heterotic combinations to maximize combining ability in F1 hybrids. Although the challenges are considerable, the transition from populations to inbred line-based F1 hybrid breeding is gaining traction (Begheyn et al., 2016; Do Canto et al., 2016; Herridge et al., 2019) and provides a long-awaited route to increased rates of genetic gain.
A major concern regarding the creation of homozygous inbred lines in forage grasses is the reduced fitness due to repeated cycles of self-pollination, a phenomenon called ‘inbreeding depression’. Inbreeding depression is caused by the unmasking of recessive deleterious mutations through inbreeding, that have accumulated over generations in obligate outcrossers. In outcrossing individuals, their deleterious effects are buffered as they exist mostly in the heterozygous state (Charlesworth and Willis, 2009). One way to overcome inbreeding depression is by eliminating, or ‘purging’, recessive deleterious alleles. This can be achieved by recurrent self-pollination of plants showing high performance at each selfing generation, until fully homozygous plants are created with a similar fitness to the original, highly heterozygous parent. This is particularly important in perennial species, like many of the forage grasses, that regularly reproduce asexually, accumulating recessive deleterious somatic mutations (Zhang et al., 2019).
In grasses, inbreeding depression is severe and dependent on the genotype and number of cycles of inbreeding (Do Canto et al., 2016). Moreover, because of SI, purging deleterious alleles is challenging. Only few and heavily depressed inbred progenies can be obtained by forced self-pollination in self-incompatible plants or by exploiting environmental conditions that favour pseudo-self-compatibility. This has impeded grass breeders in their efforts to produce highly homozygous lines, purged of their genetic load. In self-incompatible genotypes, the process of purging may be facilitated by the fact that, by self-pollination of a single plant, it is possible to produce a larger progeny pool to select from at each self-pollination cycle. Selfing is efficient in eliminating deleterious alleles whose effect on the phenotype are clearly visible and can be selected against, but less effective on mildly deleterious alleles (Boakes and Wang, 2005). As a result, while selfing helps to reduce a large part of the mutation load, it can also accelerate the fixation of deleterious alleles that are difficult to detect. Also, repeated selfing from a highly heterozygous genotype likely results in a reduction of genome size due to the purging of transposable elements and chromosomal knobs, as shown in Z. mays (Roessler et al., 2019). Given the absence of empirical data on the impact of systematic selfing in forage grasses, it is difficult to envisage the impact of purging efforts and their effect on traits of agronomic importance. However, as recently demonstrated in potato (Solanum tuberosum), overcoming inbreeding depression by incorporating SC in selected germplasm is feasible and provides the possibility of creating novel, valuable inbred germplasm for F1 hybrid breeding (Lindhout et al., 2011; Jansky et al., 2016).
Expanding the self-compatible germplasm pool for breeding
Forage grass breeders use a number of species, inter-species and inter-generic hybrids of the Lolium–Festuca complex but SC sources are currently only available in a restricted range of L. perenne genotypes and in its naturally self-compatible relatives, such as L. temulentum and flaxfield ryegrass (Lolium remotum). For effective exploitation of SC in breeding programmes it is crucial that a broad base of self-compatible germplasm is available. Introgressing SC within the Lolium genus would present little difficulty because all species have the same ploidy level (2n = 2x = 14) and show high levels of homoeologous chromosome pairing in interspecific hybrid offspring (Jauhar, 1975a). A straightforward approach of crossing two diploid individuals to produce, at least partially, fertile offspring followed by continued backcrossing could be utilized, as performed by Thorogood and Hayward (1992) and Yamada (2001) to transfer SC from L. temulentum to L. perenne and L. multiflorum. Autotetraploidy in L. perenne and L. multiflorum, induced by colchicine treatment of seeds or vegetative tillers, is exploited routinely in forage grass breeding programmes and transfer of SC into autotetraploid ryegrasses may be desirable. Although it was assumed, based on Stebbin’s seminal research, that polyploidy is inherently associated with SC (Stebbins, 1950), a relatively recent review showed no such relationship between the two traits (Mable, 2004). Certainly, polyploid Festuca species, as well as induced L. perenne, L. multiflorum and meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis) autopolyploids, exhibit an effective SI system and transfer of SC into a range of inter-fertile polyploid Lolium and Festuca species and hybrids could be proposed. For SC to be expressed in grass polyploids, introgressing SC into polyploid germplasm is a necessity and offers potential advantages over self-compatible diploid counterparts. For instance, theory predicts that polyploidy reduces the effect of the inbreeding depression that inevitably arises after repeated selfing of highly heterozygous plants (Lande and Schemske, 1985; Husband and Schemske, 1997). It has been shown that in autotetraploid (2n = 2x = 28) L. perenne the source of SC on LG 5 is functional (Do Canto et al., 2020). Thus, it should be possible to produce self-compatible tetraploid varieties of Lolium species by first introgressing SC from diploid L. perenne and, after repeated backcrossing, inducing genome doubling in the self-compatible offspring through colchicine treatment (Morgan, 1976).
Species within the wider Lolium–Festuca (Section Bovinae = subg. Schedonorus) complex produce viable inter-generic hybrids (× Festulolium) that are of increasing interest to farmers because of their inherent superior abiotic stress tolerance and adaptability to a range of climate change scenarios (Humphreys et al., 2014; Mäkinen et al., 2018). Although there are clearly genetic and physical incongruities between the two genera in these hybrids, such as differences in gross chromosome morphology and size and, in many cases, chromosome number (ploidy level) that cause reduced hybrid fertility, there is a high degree of orthology and co-linearity (Jones et al., 2002; Alm et al., 2003). This offers the opportunity to introgress SC into a wider variety of agronomically important grass species. In addition, it leads to the prospect of producing lines having beneficial traits from both the Lolium and the Festuca genus. In fact, transferring useful traits in the Lolium–Festuca complex by repeated backcrossing of an interspecific hybrid with one of its parent species has found wide application in grass breeding. Introgression efforts have focused on backcrossing traits such as drought (Humphreys et al., 2005) and freezing tolerance (Kosmala et al., 2007), winter hardiness (Tamura et al., 2017) and disease resistance (Płażek et al., 2018) from the generally more robust Festuca species to the higher-yielding and nutritionally superior Lolium species (Kopecký et al., 2017). For the successful transfer of SC sources across the complex, careful consideration must be given to both the degree of chromosome homology between the donor and recipient species along with differences in ploidy level, where diploid, triploid, tetraploid and hexaploid examples of the Festuca genus are found in nature. Transferring SC between Lolium and diploid meadow fescue (F. pratensis) is straightforward and natural hybrids are commonly found where the species are sympatric. Though previous reports have shown difficulties in producing seeds in sufficient quantity from the interspecific hybrids between L. perenne and F. pratensis, embryo rescue can increase the numbers of individuals recovered (Reusch, 1959; Kinoshita, 2007). Although hybrids are usually male sterile, further generations can be obtained through backcrossing to either of the parent species. Another approach used to alleviate male sterility is to artificially induce tetraploidy by treatment of the parent plants, or the F1 hybrid itself, with colchicine (Crowder, 1953; King et al., 1998). Repeated rounds of backcrossing to diploid plants with SC selection would restore diploidy whilst retaining the source of SC. Alternatively, the induced tetraploid hybrids can be used to produce tetraploid populations. Following the demonstration of SC being expressed in autotetraploid L. perenne (Do Canto et al., 2020), it has been shown that the SC source reported by Slatter et al. (2020) is readily expressed in L. perenne × F. pratensis tetraploids derived from crosses between self-compatible L. perenne and self-incompatible F. pratensis, generating viable seeds after selfing (D Thorogood, unpubl. data). Thus, the generic Lolium × Festuca hybrids, × Festulolium, provide a valuable target for transferring SC, especially as they display heterosis and reduced genetic load brought about by the combination of contrasting genomes (Comai, 2005). Consequently, the degree of inbreeding depression in polyploids would be reduced at each cycle of self-pollination, allowing the gradual removal of recessive mutations over successive generations more easily than in diploids. However, for full exploitation of fixed heterosis in self-compatible hybrid lines, the problem of genetic instability and reduced fertility due to partial homoeologous chromosome pairing, resulting in segmental allopolyploidy, needs to be resolved (Svačina et al., 2020). The fact that many of the parental Festuca species are true allopolyploids with complete homeologous pairing indicates genetic control of chromosome pairing that can potentially be exploited (Jauhar, 1975b; Kopecký et al., 2009, 2017; Svačina et al., 2020). If successful, the ability to fix heterosis in self-compatible allopolyploid lines would negate the challenges of producing F1 hybrids.
Immortalized populations for trait mapping
Trait-mapping projects in grass species are often based on F1 or F2 populations originating from a two-way pseudo-test cross between two highly heterozygous parents with contrasting traits. The substantial segregation shown in the progeny makes them suitable for mapping.
Such pseudo F1/F2 populations have been genotyped and phenotyped to identify QTL for several agronomical and physiological traits in L. perenne (Muylle et al., 2005; Barre et al., 2009), L. multiflorum (Studer et al., 2007), F. pratensis (Ergon et al., 2006; Alm et al., 2011), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) (Saha et al., 2009) and cock’s-foot (Dactylis glomerata) (Kallida et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2016). Because single F1 plants cannot be selfed, pseudo-test crosses or full-sib matings of F1 plants have been widely employed to construct pseudo-backcross or pseudo-F2 populations. An example is the L. perenne VrnA population, a two-way pseudo-testcross F2 population initially constructed to identify QTL underlying vernalization response genes (Jensen et al., 2005). In L. multiflorum and F. pratensis, several studies report the development of pseudo-F2 populations by intermating several full-sib F1 plants (Inoue et al., 2004; Ergon et al., 2013, 2016; Wang et al., 2016). Only three ‘true’ F2 populations, all developed in L. perenne, are currently available among grasses: ‘F2 Biomass’, ‘WSC F2’ and ‘F2 IOWA’. Self-compatible plants produced by obligate selfing were used for their development, and thus it has been possible to create them by self-pollinating a single F1 individual. These populations have been employed in a handful of genetic mapping studies (Thorogood et al., 2005; Turner et al., 2006; Tomaszewski et al., 2012; Arias-Aguirre et al., 2013; Foito et al., 2015; Do Canto et al., 2018). Moreover, individuals of the F2 Biomass have served as starting material for the creation of the only immortalized population so far developed in forage grasses (Velmurugan et al., 2018).
Though mapping efforts have had successful outcomes, SI and subsequent enforced heterozygosity means that most mapping populations in grasses consist of individuals that can only be maintained vegetatively. This is time-consuming and can compromise genetic integrity over time through somatic mutation and age-related genetic developmental changes or simply through human handling errors. The death of individual genotypes, causing a reduction in population size over time, will also reduce the size and genetic value of the mapping population. That is why the development of self-compatible germplasm resources for mapping important agronomic traits through the creation of inbred lines such as RILs and double haploids for broad-scale mapping (Hina et al., 2020) and subsequently NILs for fine-mapping specific genomic regions and candidate gene identification (Zhang et al., 2021) is potentially valuable. These germplasm resources present the advantage of enabling multiple independent mapping projects to analyse a single line, as they are easily stored and distributed as seeds along with being considered ‘immortal’ due to their homozygous nature and capacity to be maintained by self-pollination. A more systematic use of reference immortal populations will help not only in the identification of QTL underlying genes of interest, but also with developing molecular markers that can assist in trait selection.
Dissection of heterosis
Heterosis is a complex trait expressed through the action of multiple loci (Schnable and Springer, 2013). In rice (Oryza sativa) (Hua et al., 2002, 2003; Qu et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2012; Zhen et al., 2017) and Z. mays (Frascaroli et al., 2007; Tang et al., 2010; Giraud et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2016), genomics and QTL mapping approaches have allowed the identification of major loci associated with heterosis and have provided insights into its genetic architecture. Despite heterotic loci in grasses being unknown, heterotic levels have been reported for different types of experimental hybrids (Foster, 1971a, b, 1973; Posselt, 1993, 2010; Anhalt et al., 2009; Barrett et al., 2010; O’Connor et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016), representing an untapped resource that breeders should capture. However, such unexplored potential can only be exploited with the identification of heterotic groups. In forage grasses, well-defined heterotic groups are not available (Vogt et al., 2020). This is explained by the high relatedness of plant material within and between different breeding programmes, often the result of exchange of material among breeders or common initial germplasm. However, high-throughput genotyping approaches have proved successful in capturing the genetic diversity contained in germplasm and dividing it into different subpopulations (Vogt et al., 2020). In this regard, the extensive use of homozygous self-compatible genotypes can help to diverge and fix the diverse gene pool contained in such different clusters, and to structure and define different heterotic groups. This will provide breeders with strategies to effectively select parental genotypes to be used for hybrid crosses and for the prediction of hybrid performance. In addition, the availability of well-diverged heterotic groups, coupled with advancement in sequencing technologies will allow the identification of genomic heterotic loci, for a better understanding of the genetic regulation of this complex phenomenon.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Identifying and characterizing the basis of SC in grasses serves to provide a better understanding of the genes involved in the induction of SC, and knowledge of how SC arises in normally self-incompatible species can help biologists determine the pathways involved in the SI process in grasses. This offers insights into the evolutionary relationship of the grass SI system with other SI systems and, more widely, with other cell–cell recognition processes in living organisms. The subsequent exploitation of SC has the potential to promote more effective breeding methodologies based on the development of population or F1 hybrids exploiting genetic variation for hybrid vigour. Fundamental studies of the genetic basis of the heterosis that SC facilitates will be critical for targeted practical application. The systematic investigation of the agronomic performance of hybrids and the design of efficient seed production systems will be pivotal for efficient production of first-generation hybrid or pure-line cultivars. Afforded by SC mutations, research exploring heterosis in normally outcrossing species, with high levels of accumulated heterozygosity and genetic diversity, offers the prospect of contributing significantly to our understanding of heterosis currently gained from model species and self-fertile crops.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary data are available online at https://academic.oup.com/aob and consist of the following. Table S1: summary of published literature on SI breakdown to SC in flowering plants. References S1: references cited in Table S1.
Funding
This review was made possible through funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 722338 – PlantHUB, the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL), Germany (reference no. 22024715), the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF Professorship PP00P2_138983) and the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council through Institute Strategic Programme and Core Strategic Programme grants (BB/J004405/1, BB/CSP1730/1 and BB/G012342/1).
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
All authors participated in the design and conceptualization of this review. CC and IP wrote the manuscript, all authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest that are relevant to the content of this article.
LITERATURE CITED
- Abbo S, Lev-Yadun S, Gopher A. 2012. Plant domestication and crop evolution in the Near East: on events and processes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 31: 241–257. [Google Scholar]
- Allen AM, Hiscock SJ. 2008. Evolution and phylogeny of self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. In: Franklin-Tong VE, ed. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: evolution, diversity, and mechanisms. Berlin: Springer, 73–101. [Google Scholar]
- Alm V, Fang C, Busso CS, et al. 2003. A linkage map of meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) and comparative mapping with other Poaceae species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 25–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alm V, Busso CS, Ergon A, et al. 2011. QTL analyses and comparative genetic mapping of frost tolerance, winter survival and drought tolerance in meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 123: 369–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anhalt UCM, Heslop-Harrison PJS, Piepho HP, Byrne S, Barth S. 2009. Quantitative trait loci mapping for biomass yield traits in a Lolium inbred line derived F2 population. Euphytica 170: 99–107. [Google Scholar]
- Arias-Aguirre A, Studer B, Canto JD, Frei U, Lübberstedt T. 2013. Mapping a new source of self-fertility in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 1: 385–395. [Google Scholar]
- Arojju SK, Cao M, Zulfi Jahufer MZ, Barrett BA, Faville MJ. 2020. Genomic predictive ability for foliar nutritive traits in perennial ryegrass. G3 (Bethesda) 10: 695–708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barre P, Moreau L, Mi F, et al. 2009. Quantitative trait loci for leaf length in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Grass and Forage Science 64: 310–321. [Google Scholar]
- Barrett BA, Turner MA, Lyons TB, Rolston MP, Easton HS. 2010. Evaluation of semi-hybrid perennial ryegrass populations. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 72: 11–16. [Google Scholar]
- Bateman AJ. 1952. Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. Heredity 6: 285–310. [Google Scholar]
- Beddows AR. 1931. Seed setting and flowering in various grasses. University College of Wales Series H 12: 5–99. [Google Scholar]
- Begheyn R, Lübberstedt T, Studer B. 2016. Haploid and doubled haploid techniques in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) to advance research and breeding. Agronomy 6: 60. [Google Scholar]
- Begheyn RF, Yates SA, Sykes T, Studer B. 2018. Genetic loci governing androgenic capacity in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). G3 (Bethesda) 8: 1897–1908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blackmore T, Thomas I, McMahon R, Powell W, Hegarty M. 2015. Genetic-geographic correlation revealed across a broad European ecotypic sample of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) using array-based SNP genotyping. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128: 1917–1932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boakes E, Wang J. 2005. A simulation study on detecting purging of inbreeding depression in captive populations. Genetical Research 86: 139–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boualem A, Fleurier S, Troadec C, et al. 2014. Development of a Cucumis sativus TILLinG platform for forward and reverse genetics. PLoS ONE 9: e97963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brennan AC, Tabah DA, Harris SA, Hiscock SJ. 2011. Sporophytic self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae): S allele dominance interactions and modifiers of cross-compatibility and selfing rates. Heredity 106: 113–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brummer EC. 1999. Capturing heterosis in forage crop cultivar development. Crop Science 39: 943–954. [Google Scholar]
- Brummer EC, Bouton JH, Casler MD, McCaslin MH, Waldron BL. 2009. Grasses and legumes: genetics and plant breeding. In: Wedin WF, Fales SL, eds. Grassland: quietness and strength for a new American agriculture. Madison: ASA, CSSA, SSSA, 157–171. [Google Scholar]
- Burr B, Burr FA, Thompson KH, Albertson MC, Stuber CW. 1988. Gene mapping with recombinant inbreds in maize. Genetics 118: 519–526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Byrne SL, Nagy I, Pfeifer M, et al. 2015. A synteny-based draft genome sequence of the forage grass Lolium perenne. Plant Journal 84: 816–826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cericola F, Lenk I, Fè D, et al. 2018. Optimized use of low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing for genomic prediction among multi-parental family pools and single plants in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlesworth D, Willis JH. 2009. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics 10: 783–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen S, Jia J, Cheng L, et al. 2019. Transcriptomic analysis reveals a comprehensive calcium- and phytohormone-dominated signalling response in Leymus chinensis self-incompatibility. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20: 2356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Comai L. 2005. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 836–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Copetti D, Yates S, Vogt MM, et al. 2021. Evidence for high intergenic sequence variation in heterozygous Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) genome revealed by a high-quality draft diploid genome assembly. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2021.05.05.442707. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cornish MA, Hayward MD, Lawrence MJ. 1979. Self-incompatibility in ryegrass. I. Genetic control in diploid Lolium perenne L. Heredity 43: 95–106. [Google Scholar]
- Cornish MA, Hayward MD, Lawrence MJ. 1980. Self-incompatibility in ryegrass. IV. Seed-set in diploid Lolium perenne L. Heredity 44: 333–340. [Google Scholar]
- Cropano C, Manzanares M, Yates S, et al. 2021. Identification of candidate genes for self-compatibility in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.29.437398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crowder LV. 1953. Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids of Festuca and Lolium. Journal of Heredity 44: 195–203. [Google Scholar]
- Dalmais M, Schmidt J, Le Signor C, et al. 2008. UTILLdb, a Pisum sativum in silico forward and reverse genetics tool. Genome Biology 9: R43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Do Canto J, Studer B, Lubberstedt T. 2016. Overcoming self-incompatibility in grasses: a pathway to hybrid breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 129: 1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Do Canto J, Studer B, Frei U, Lübberstedt T. 2018. Fine mapping a self-fertility locus in perennial ryegrass. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 131: 817–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Do Canto J, Studer B, Frei U, Lübberstedt T. 2020. Pattern of inheritance of a self-fertility gene in an autotetraploid perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) population. Plant Breeding 139: 207–213. [Google Scholar]
- Egorova IA, Peneva TI, Baranova OA, Voylokov AV. 2000. Analysis of linkage between biochemical and morphological markers of rye chromosomes 1R, 2R, and 5R and mutations of self-fertility at the main incompatibility loci. Russian Journal of Genetics 36: 1423–1430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elgersma, A, Stephenson, AG, den Nijs APM. 1989. Effects of genotype and temperature on pollen tube growth in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Sexual Plant Reproduction 2: 225–230. [Google Scholar]
- England FJW. 1974. The use of incompatibility for the production of F1 hybrids in forage grasses. Heredity 32: 183–188. [Google Scholar]
- Ergon A, Fang C, Jørgensen Ø, Aamlid TS, Rognli OA. 2006. Quantitative trait loci controlling vernalisation requirement, heading time and number of panicles in meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112: 232–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ergon Å, Hamland H, Rognli OA. 2013. Differential expression of VRN1 and other MADS-box genes in Festuca pratensis selections with different vernalization requirements. Biologia Plantarum 57: 245–254. [Google Scholar]
- Ergon Å, Melby TI, Höglind M, Rognli OA. 2016. Vernalization requirement and the chromosomal VRN1-region can affect freezing tolerance and expression of cold-regulated genes in Festuca pratensis. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 207. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Esfandyari H, Fè D, Tessema BB, Janss LL, Jensen J. 2020. Effects of different strategies for exploiting genomic selection in perennial ryegrass breeding programs. G3 (Bethesda) 10: 3783–3795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fè D, Cericola F, Byrne S, et al. 2015. Genomic dissection and prediction of heading date in perennial ryegrass. BMC Genomics 16: 921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fearon CH, Hayward MD, Lawrence MJ. 1983. Self-incompatibility in ryegrass. Heredity 50: 35–45. [Google Scholar]
- Fearon CH, Cornish MA, Hayward MD, Lawrence MJ. 1994. Self-incompatibility in ryegrass. X. Number and frequency of alleles in a natural population of Lolium perenne L. Heredity 73: 254–261. [Google Scholar]
- Foito A, Hackett CA, Byrne SL, Stewart D, Barth S. 2015. Quantitative trait loci analysis to study the genetic regulation of non-polar metabolites in perennial ryegrass. Metabolomics 11: 412–424. [Google Scholar]
- Foster CA. 1971a. Interpopulational and intervarietal hybridization in Lolium perenne breeding: heterosis under non-competitive conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science 76: 107–130. [Google Scholar]
- Foster CA. 1971b. Interpopulational and intervarietal F1 hybrids in Lolium perenne: heterosis under simulated-sward conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science 76: 401–409. [Google Scholar]
- Foster CA. 1973. Interpopulational and intervarietal F1 hybrids in Lolium perenne: performance in field sward conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science 80: 463–477. [Google Scholar]
- Frascaroli E, Canè MA, Landi P, et al. 2007. Classical genetic and quantitative trait loci analyses of heterosis in a maize hybrid between two elite inbred lines. Genetics 176: 625–644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuong FT, Voylokov AV, Smirnov VG. 1993. Genetic studies of self-fertility in rye (Secale cereale L.). 2. The search for isozyme marker genes linked to self-incompatibility loci. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87: 619–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giraud H, Bauland C, Falque M, et al. 2017. Linkage analysis and association mapping QTL detection models for hybrids between multiparental populations from two heterotic groups: application to biomass production in maize (Zea mays L.). G3 (Bethesda) 7: 3649–3657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gottwald S, Bauer P, Komatsuda T, Lundqvist U, Stein N. 2009. TILLING in the two-rowed barley cultivar ‘Barke’ reveals preferred sites of functional diversity in the gene HvHox1. BMC Research Notes 2: 258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grinberg NF, Lovatt A, Hegarty M, et al. 2016. Implementation of genomic prediction in Lolium perenne (L.) breeding populations. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo X, Cericola F, Fè D, et al. 2018. Genomic prediction in tetraploid ryegrass using allele frequencies based on genotyping by sequencing. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 1165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guzy-Wrobelska J, Szarejko I. 2003. Molecular and agronomic evaluation of wheat doubled haploid lines obtained through maize pollination and anther culture methods. Plant Breeding 122: 305–313. [Google Scholar]
- Hamrick JL, Godt MJW. 1996. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. Biological Sciences 351: 1291–1298. [Google Scholar]
- Hayes BJ, Cogan NOI, Pembleton LW, et al. 2013. Prospects for genomic selection in forage plant species. Plant Breeding 132: 133–143. [Google Scholar]
- Hayman D. 1956. The genetical control of incompatibility in Phalaris coerulescens Desf. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 9: 321–331. [Google Scholar]
- Hayman DL, Richter J. 1992. Mutations affecting self-incompatibility in Phalaris coerulescens Desf. (Poaceae). Heredity 68: 495–503. [Google Scholar]
- Herridge RP, Macknight RC, Brownfield LR. 2019. Prospects for F1 hybrid production in ryegrass. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 63: 405–415. [Google Scholar]
- Hina A, Cao Y, Song S, et al. 2020. High-resolution mapping in two RIL populations refines major ‘QTL hotspot’ regions for seed size and shape in soybean (Glycine max L.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21: 1040. Article number: 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hua JP, Xing YZ, Xu CG, Sun XL, Yu SB, Zhang Q. 2002. Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance. Genetics 162: 1885–1895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hua J, Xing Y, Wu W, et al. 2003. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100: 2574–2579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Humphreys J, Harper JA, Armstead IP, Humphreys MW. 2005. Introgression-mapping of genes for drought resistance transferred from Festuca arundinacea var. glaucescens into Lolium multiflorum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110: 579–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Humphreys MW, O’Donovan SA, Farrell MS, Gay AP, Kingston-Smith AH. 2014. The potential of novel Festulolium (2n = 4x = 28) hybrids as productive, nutrient-use-efficient fodder for ruminants. Food and Energy Security 3: 98–110. [Google Scholar]
- Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1997. The effect of inbreeding in diploid and tetraploid populations of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae): implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Evolution 51: 737–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huyghe C, De Vliegher A, Van Gils B, Peeters A. 2014. Grasslands and herbivore production in Europe and effects of common policies. Versailles: Editions Quae. https://www.multisward.eu/multisward_eng/content/download/3181/32702/version/1/file/9782759221578QUAE.pdf (4 November 2020, date last accessed). [Google Scholar]
- Igic B, Lande R, Kohn JR. 2008. Loss of self incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 93–104. [Google Scholar]
- Inoue M, Gao Z, Cai H. 2004. QTL analysis of lodging resistance and related traits in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 1576–1585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iriondo JM, Milla R, Volis S, Rubio de Casas R. 2018. Reproductive traits and evolutionary divergence between Mediterranean crops and their wild relatives. Plant Biology (Stuttgart) 20 (Suppl 1): 78–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Islam MS, Studer B, Møller IM, Asp T. 2014. Genetics and biology of cytoplasmic male sterility and its applications in forage and turf grass breeding. Plant Breeding 133: 299–312. [Google Scholar]
- Jansky SH, Charkowski AO, Douches DS, et al. 2016. Reinventing potato as a diploid inbred line-based crop. Crop Science 56: 1412–1422. [Google Scholar]
- Jauhar PP. 1975a. Chromosome relationships between Lolium and Festuca (Gramineae). Chromosoma 52: 103–121. [Google Scholar]
- Jauhar PP. 1975b. Genetic control of diploid-like meiosis in hexaploid tall fescue. Nature 254: 595–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenkin TJ. 1930. Inheritance in Lolium perenne L. Journal of Genetics 22: 389–394. [Google Scholar]
- Jensen LB, Andersen JR, Frei U, et al. 2005. QTL mapping of vernalization response in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) reveals co-location with an orthologue of wheat VRN1. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110: 527–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jighly A, Lin Z, Pembleton LW, et al. 2019. Boosting genetic gain in allogamous crops via speed breeding and genomic selection. Frontiers in Plant Science 10: 1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones ES, Mahoney NL, Hayward MD, et al. 2002. An enhanced molecular marker based genetic map of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) reveals comparative relationships with other Poaceae genomes. Genome 45: 282–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaeppler SM, Phillips RL, Kim TS. 1993. Use of near-isogenic lines derived by backcrossing or selfing to map qualitative traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87: 233–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kallida R, Zhouri L, Volaire F, et al. 2016. Combining drought survival via summer dormancy and annual biomass productivity in Dactylis glomerata L. Frontiers in Plant Science 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kantar MB, Nashoba AR, Anderson JE, Blackman BK, Rieseberg LH. 2017. The genetics and genomics of plant domestication. BioScience 67: 971–982. [Google Scholar]
- Keep T, Sampoux JP, Blanco-Pastor JL, et al. 2020. High-throughput genome-wide genotyping to optimize the use of natural genetic resources in the grassland species perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). G3 (Bethesda) 10: 3347–3364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King IP, Morgan WG, Armstead IP, et al. 1998. Introgression mapping in the grasses. I. Introgression of Festuca pratensis chromosomes and chromosome segments into Lolium perenne. Heredity 81: 462–467. [Google Scholar]
- Kinoshita T. 2007. Reproductive barrier and genomic imprinting in the endosperm of flowering plants. Genes & Genetic Systems 82: 177–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klaas M, Yang B, Bosch M, et al. 2011. Progress towards elucidating the mechanisms of self-incompatibility in the grasses: further insights from studies in Lolium. Annals of Botany 108: 677–685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knorst V, Yates S, Byrne S, et al. 2019. First assembly of the gene-space of Lolium multiflorum and comparison to other Poaceae genomes. Grassland Science 65: 125–134. [Google Scholar]
- Kopecký D, Bartoš J, Zwierzykowski Z, Doležel J. 2009. Chromosome pairing of individual genomes in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), its progenitors, and hybrids with Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.). Cytogenetic and Genome Research 124: 170–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kopecký D, Šimoníková D, Ghesquière M, Doležel J. 2017. Stability of genome composition and recombination between homoeologous chromosomes in Festulolium (Festuca × Lolium) cultivars. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 151: 106–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korte A, Farlow A. 2013. The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: a review. Plant Methods 9: 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kosmala A, Zwierzykowski Z, Zwierzykowska E, et al. 2007. Introgression mapping of genes for winter hardiness and frost tolerance transferred from Festuca arundinacea into Lolium multiflorum. Journal of Heredity 98: 311–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laidig F, Piepho HP, Drobek T, Meyer U. 2014. Genetic and non-genetic long-term trends of 12 different crops in German official variety performance trials and on-farm yield trends. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 127: 2599–2617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande R, Schemske DW. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin Z, Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD. 2014. Genomic selection in crops, trees and forages: a review. Crop & Pasture Science 65: 1177–1191. [Google Scholar]
- Lindhout P, Meijer D, Schotte T, Hutten RCB, Visser RGF, van Eck HJ. 2011. Towards F1 hybrid seed potato breeding. Potato Research 54: 301–312. [Google Scholar]
- Lundqvist A. 1956. Self-incompatibility in rye: I. Genetic control in the diploid. Hereditas 42: 293–348. [Google Scholar]
- Lundqvist A. 1958. Self-incompatibility in rye: IV. Factors related to self-seeding. Hereditas 44: 193–256. [Google Scholar]
- Lundqvist A. 1962. The nature of the two-loci incompatibility system in grasses. I. The hypothesis of a duplicative origin. Hereditas 48: 153–168. [Google Scholar]
- Lundqvist A. 1968. The mode of origin of self fertility in grasses. Hereditas 59: 413–426. [Google Scholar]
- Lundqvist A. 1990. The complex S-gene system for control of self-incompatibility in the buttercup genus Ranunculus. Hereditas 113: 29–46. [Google Scholar]
- Lundqvist A. 1991. Four-locus S-gene control of self-incompatibility made probable in Lilium martagon (Liliaceae). Hereditas 114: 57–63. [Google Scholar]
- Lundqvist A, Østerbye U, Larsen K, Linde-Laursen I. 1973. Complex self-incompatibility systems in Ranunculus acris L. and Beta vulgaris L. Hereditas 74: 161–168. [Google Scholar]
- Mable BK. 2004. Polyploidy and self-compatibility: is there an association? New Phytologist 162: 803–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mable BK, Hagmann J, Kim ST, et al. 2017. What causes mating system shifts in plants? Arabidopsis lyrata as a case study. Heredity 118: 52–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mäkinen H, Kaseva J, Virkajärvi P, Kahiluoto H. 2018. Gaps in the capacity of modern forage crops to adapt to the changing climate in northern Europe. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 23: 81–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manzanares C, Barth S, Thorogood D, et al. 2016. a. A gene encoding a DUF247 domain protein cosegregates with the S self-incompatibility locus in perennial ryegrass. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33: 870–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manzanares C, Yates S, Ruckle M, Nay M, Studer B. 2016b. TILLING in forage grasses for gene discovery and breeding improvement. New Biotechnology 33: 594–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin FW. 1959. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technology 34: 125–128.77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez-Reyna JM, Vogel KP. 2008. Heterosis in switchgrass: spaced plants. Crop Science 48: 1312–1320. [Google Scholar]
- McCallum CM, Comai L, Greene EA, Henikoff S. 2000. Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes (TILLING) for plant functional genomics. Plant Physiology 123: 439–442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDermott P, Connolly V, Kavanagh TA. 2008. The mitochondrial genome of a cytoplasmic male sterile line of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) contains an integrated linear plasmid-like element. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117: 459–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonagh J, McEvoy M, O’Donovan M, Gilliland TJ. 2014. Genetic gain in yield of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) and hybrid ryegrass (Lolium × boucheanum Kunth) cultivars in Northern Ireland Recommended Lists 1972–2013. In: Hopkins A,Collins RP, Fraser MD. et al., eds. Grassland science in Europe, Vol. 19. EGF at 50 – The future of European grasslands. Wales, UK: European Grassland Federation, 836–839. https://www.europeangrassland.org/fileadmin/documents/Infos/Printed_Matter/Proceedings/EGF2014.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Morgan WG. 1976. A technique for the production of polyploids in grasses. Euphytica 25: 443–446. [Google Scholar]
- Muñoz-Sanz JV, Zuriaga E, Cruz-García F, McClure B, Romero C. 2020. Self-(in)compatibility systems: target traits for crop-production, plant breeding, and biotechnology. Frontiers in Plant Science 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muylle H, Baert J, Van Bockstaele E, Pertijs J, Roldán-Ruiz I. 2005. Four QTLs determine crown rust (Puccinia coronata f. sp. lolii) resistance in a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) population. Heredity 95: 348–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Connor J, Lyons T, Jahufer Z, Faville M, Barrett B. 2015. Identifying potential heterosis in perennial ryegrass. Journal of New Zealand Grasslands 77: 227–232. [Google Scholar]
- Ono K, Akagi T, Morimoto T, Wünsch A, Tao R. 2018. Genome re-sequencing of diverse sweet cherry (Prunus avium) individuals reveals a modifier gene mutation conferring pollen-part self-compatibility. Plant & Cell Physiology 59: 1265–1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pembleton LW, Shinozuka H, Wang J, Spangenberg GC, Forster JW, Cogan NO. 2015. Design of an F1 hybrid breeding strategy for ryegrasses based on selection of self-incompatibility locus-specific alleles. Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piron F, Nicolaï M, Minoïa S, et al. 2010. An induced mutation in tomato eIF4E leads to immunity to two potyviruses. PLoS ONE 5: e11313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Płażek A, Pociecha E, Augustyniak A, et al. 2018. Dissection of resistance to Microdochium nivale in Lolium multiflorum/Festuca arundinacea introgression forms. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 123: 43–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Posselt UK. 1993. Hybrid production in Lolium perenne based on incompatibility. Euphytica 71: 29–33. [Google Scholar]
- Posselt UK. 2010. Breeding methods in cross-pollinated species. In: Boller B, Posselt UK, Veronesi F, eds. Fodder crops and amenity grasses. New York: Springer, 39–88. [Google Scholar]
- Qu Z, Li L, Luo J, et al. 2012. QTL mapping of combining ability and heterosis of agronomic traits in rice backcross recombinant inbred lines and hybrid crosses. PLoS ONE 7: e28463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reusch JDH. 1959. Embryological studies on seed development in reciprocal crosses between Lolium perenne and Festuca pratensis. South African Journal of Agricultural Science 2: 429–449. [Google Scholar]
- Roessler K, Muyle A, Diez CM, et al. 2019. The genome-wide dynamics of purging during selfing in maize. Nature Plants 5: 980–990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rouwendal GJA, Creemers-Molenaar J, Krens FA. 1992. Molecular aspects of cytoplasmic male-sterility in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L) - mtDNA and RNA differences between plants with male-sterile and fertile cytoplasm and restriction mapping of their atp6 and cox1 homologous regions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 83: 330–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saha M, Kirigwi F, Chekhovskiy K, Black J, Hopkins A. 2009. Molecular mapping of QTLs associated with important forage traits in tall fescue. In: Yamada T, Spangenberg G, eds. Molecular breeding of forage and turf. New York: Springer, 251–258. [Google Scholar]
- Schnable PS, Springer NM. 2013. Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 64: 71–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shinozuka H, Cogan NO, Smith KF, Spangenberg GC, Forster JW. 2010. Fine-scale comparative genetic and physical mapping supports map-based cloning strategies for the self-incompatibility loci of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Plant Molecular Biology 72: 343–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shinozuka H, Cogan NOI, Spangenberg GC, Forster JW. 2017. Reference transcriptome assembly and annotation for perennial ryegrass. Genome 60: 1086–1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slade AJ, Fuerstenberg SI, Loeffler D, Steine MN, Facciotti D. 2005. A reverse genetic, nontransgenic approach to wheat crop improvement by TILLING. Nature Biotechnology 23: 75–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slatter LM, Barth S, Manzanares C, Velmurugan J, Place I, Thorogood D. 2020. A new genetic locus for self-compatibility in the outcrossing grass species perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Annals of Botany 127: 715–722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stebbins GL. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Studer B, Boller B, Bauer E, Poszselt UK, Widmer F, Kölliker R. 2007. Consistent detection of QTLs for crown rust resistance in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) across environments and phenotyping methods. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 115: 9–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Svačina R, Sourdille P, Kopecký D, Bartoš J. 2020. Chromosome pairing in polyploid grasses. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Talukder SK, Saha MC. 2017. Toward genomics-based breeding in C3 cool-season perennial grasses. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K, Tase K, Sanada Y, Komatsu T, Yonemaru J, Kubota A. 2017. Effects of introgressions from Festuca pratensis on winter hardiness of Lolium perenne. Euphytica 213: 226. [Google Scholar]
- Tang J, Yan J, Ma X, et al. 2010. Dissection of the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite maize hybrid by QTL mapping in an immortalized F2 population. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 120: 333–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taube F, Vogeler I, Kluss C, et al. 2020. Yield progress in forage maize in NW Europe – breeding progress or climate change effects? Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thorogood D, Hayward MD. 1991. The genetic control of self-compatibility in an inbred line of Lolium perenne L. Heredity 67: 175–181. [Google Scholar]
- Thorogood D, Hayward MD. 1992. Self-compatibility in Lolium temulentum L: its genetic control and transfer into L. perenne L. and L. multiflorum Lam. Heredity 68: 71–78. [Google Scholar]
- Thorogood D, Kaiser WJ, Jones JG, Armstead I. 2002. Self-incompatibility in ryegrass 12. Genotyping and mapping the S and Z loci of Lolium perenne L. Heredity 88: 385–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thorogood D, Armstead IP, Turner LB, Humphreys MO, Hayward MD. 2005. Identification and mode of action of self-compatibility loci in Lolium perenne L. Heredity 94: 356–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thorogood D, Yates S, Manzanares C, et al. 2017. A novel multivariate approach to phenotyping and association mapping of multi-locus gametophytic self-incompatibility reveals S, Z, and other loci in a perennial ryegrass (Poaceae) population. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Till BJ, Reynolds SH, Weil C, et al. 2004. Discovery of induced point mutations in maize genes by TILLING. BMC Plant Biology 4: 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomaszewski C, Byrne SL, Foito A, et al. 2012. Genetic linkage mapping in an F2 perennial ryegrass population using DArT markers. Plant Breeding 131: 345–349. [Google Scholar]
- Turner LB, Cairns AJ, Armstead IP, et al. 2006. Dissecting the regulation of fructan metabolism in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) with quantitative trait locus mapping. New Phytologist 169: 45–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vekemans X, Poux C, Goubet PM, Castric V. 2014. The evolution of selfing from outcrossing ancestors in Brassicaceae: what have we learned from variation at the S-locus? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27: 1372–1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Velmurugan J, Mollison E, Barth S, et al. 2016. An ultra-high density genetic linkage map of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) using genotyping by sequencing (GBS) based on a reference shotgun genome assembly. Annals of Botany 118: 71–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Velmurugan J, Milbourne D, Connolly V, et al. 2018. An immortalized genetic mapping population for perennial ryegrass: a resource for phenotyping and complex trait mapping. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vogt M, Yates S, Sykes T, Luesink W, Koch M, Studer B. 2020. Developing heterotic groups for successful hybrid breeding in perennial ryegrass. Agronomy 10: 1410. [Google Scholar]
- Voylokov AV, Fuong FT, Smirnov VG. 1993. Genetic studies of self-fertility in rye (Secale cereale L.). 1. The identification of genotypes of self-fertile lines for the Sf alleles of self-incompatibility genes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87: 616–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voylokov AV, Korzun V, Börner A. 1998. Mapping of three self-fertility mutations in rye (Secale cereale L.) using RFLP, isozyme and morphological markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97: 147–153. [Google Scholar]
- Wang J, Pembleton LW, Cogan NOI, Forster JW. 2016. Evidence for heterosis in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) based on inbreeding depression in F2 generation offspring from biparental crosses. Agronomy 6: 49. [Google Scholar]
- Wilkins PW, Humphreys MO. 2003. Progress in breeding perennial forage grasses for temperate agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Science 140: 129–150. [Google Scholar]
- Wilkins PW, Thorogood D. 1992. Breakdown of self-incompatibility in perennial ryegrass at high temperature and its uses in breeding. Euphytica 64: 65–69. [Google Scholar]
- Woodfield DR. 1999. Genetic improvements in New Zealand forage cultivars. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 61: 3–7. [Google Scholar]
- Xu Y, Li P, Yang Z, Xu C. 2017. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci in crops. Crop Journal 5: 175–184. [Google Scholar]
- Yabe S, Ohsawa R, Iwata H. 2013. Potential of genomic selection for mass selection breeding in annual allogamous crops. Crop Science 53: 95–105. [Google Scholar]
- Yamada T. 2001. Introduction of a self-compatible gene of Lolium temulentum L. to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) for the purpose of the production of inbred lines of perennial ryegrass. Euphytica 122: 213–217. [Google Scholar]
- Yang B, Thorogood D, Armstead IP, Franklin FC, Barth S. 2009. Identification of genes expressed during the self-incompatibility response in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Plant Molecular Biology 70: 709–723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang C, Wang P, Tang D, et al. 2019. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression in potato. Nature Genetics 51: 374–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Ran Y, Nagy I, et al. 2020. Targeted mutagenesis in ryegrass (Lolium spp.) using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18: 1854–1856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Liu H, Yan G. 2021. Characterization of near-isogenic lines confirmed QTL and revealed candidate genes for plant height and yield-related traits in common wheat. Molecular Breeding 41: 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao X, Huang L, Zhang X, et al. 2016. Construction of high-density genetic linkage map and identification of flowering-time QTLs in orchardgrass using SSRs and SLAF-seq. Scientific Reports 6: 29345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhen G, Qin P, Liu KY, et al. 2017. Genome-wide dissection of heterosis for yield traits in two-line hybrid rice populations. Scientific Reports 7: 7635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou G, Chen Y, Yao W, et al. 2012. Genetic composition of yield heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109: 15847–15852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

