Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 19;218(2):iyab061. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab061

Table 1.

Estimation of selection acting on gene methylation state on the Salk dataset

Gene number Mean 4.Ne.s 4.Ne.s credible interval Conclusion
All genes 22,609 4.Ne.sUM = 0.064 0.011–0.127 No selection on gene methylation (4.Ne.s ≪ 1)
Ancestrally gbM genes 3,243 4.Ne.sgbM = 1.637 1.359–1.896 gbM state advantageous (4.Ne.sgbM ≫ 1)
Ancestrally UM genes 7,626 4.Ne.sUM = 1.896 1.514–2.237 UM state advantageous (4.Ne.sUM ≫ 1)
CHG-gain orthologs 7,534 4.Ne.sgbM = 0.286 0.176–0.393 No selection on gene methylation (4.Ne.s ≪ 1)
No-CHG-gain orthologs 15,093 4.Ne.sUM = 0.355 0.246–0.468 No selection on gene methylation (4.Ne.s ≪ 1)
Ancestrally gbM CHG-gain orthologs 1,984 4.Ne.sgbM = 1.623 1.337–1.910 gbM state advantageous (4.Ne.sgbM ≫ 1)
no-CHG-gain orthologs 1,250 4.Ne.sgbM = 1.637 1.266–2.005 gbM state advantageous (4.Ne.sgbM ≫ 1)
Ancestrally UM CHG-gain orthologs 2,184 4.Ne.sUM = 3.437 2.905–3.915 UM state advantageous (4.Ne.sUM ≫ 1)
no-CHG-gain orthologs 5,349 4.Ne.sUM = 3.178 2.728–3.601 UM state advantageous (4.Ne.sUM ≫ 1)

Parameters of the SFS model were estimated using an mcmc approach (see Materials and Methods for details). The estimated mean selection efficacy (either 4.Ne.sUM or 4.Ne.sgbM, depending on which is higher) is shown and its 95% credible interval. If 4.Ne.s >1.0 and if 1.0 is not included in the credible interval, then significant selection is inferred to act on methylation state (either the UM or the gbM state is advantageous). Details on inferred values of other parameters of the model can be found in Supplementary Table S2. These results come from one mcmc run and are equivalent to results obtained from two independent runs with random parameter initiation values (Supplementary Table S2).