Table 2.
Challenges | Proposed directions |
---|---|
Tinnitus Heterogeneity | |
Lack of understanding of tinnitus heterogeneity and no clearly defined subtypes | Systematic reviews of studies investigating tinnitus subphenotypes Standardization in tinnitus assessment and international collaborations to create large tinnitus-specific databases Exploratory analyses investigating multiple dimension of tinnitus heterogeneity in large samples to identify important phenotypes |
Epidemiology, Risk Factors & Prevention | |
Varying prevalence estimates and associations between tinnitus and other factors | Standardization of tinnitus definition Systematic reviews and retrospective analysis of existing databases Prospective analytical observational studies from nationally representative populations |
Tinnitus Mechanisms | |
Unknown underlying pathophysiology and lack of replicable functional, structural and neurochemical neural markers and genetic markers of tinnitus | Systematic reviews on methods and results of previous studies Standardization of data acquisition and analysis methods Large studies investigating suspected theories Replication of existing studies Selection of clear phenotypes for inclusion |
Tinnitus Assessment | |
Lack of standardization in tinnitus assessment (what and how) | Systematic reviews to identify the most useful and reliable measures Collaboration among research groups and consensus projects to standardize tinnitus assessment |
Treatments | |
Low evidence from clinical trials | Large randomized controlled clinical trials based on sample power calculations Pre-registration Consensus on outcome measures Treatment predictors and personalized medicine Single-case design methodology Selection of clear phenotypes for inclusion |