Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 11;9:674260. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.674260

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Comparison of monolayer and suspension using the optimized protocol. (A) Flow cytometry staining for cTnT in suspension differentiated cardiomyoctes (red) compared with antibody isotype control (blue) with corresponding quantification. (B) Flow cytometry staining for iPSC markers (SOX2, SSEA4, and Tra-1–60) in monolayer and suspension (red) differentiated cardiomyoctes compared with iPSC (blue) positive control. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of (i) stem cell, (ii) mesoderm, and (iii) cardiac gene expression throughout differentiation for monolayer (solid) and suspension (dotted) techniques. (D) TEM images of (i) suspension and (ii) monolayer differentiated CMs with labeled characteristic features, N nucleus, GJ gap junction, ZL z-line, and MC mitochondria (Scale bar = 1 μm). Measurements of mean sarcomere length in each condition (n = 25). p < 0.0001.