Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 10;13(6):1997. doi: 10.3390/nu13061997

Table 1.

Demographic information, anthropometric measurements, nutritional assessments, and BIA parameters of patients with HS and control group.

Parameters HS Patients
n. (%) or Mean ± SD
n. 35
Controls
n. (%) or Mean ± SD
n. 35
p-Value
Sex, females (n, %) 24 (68.6%) 24 (68.6%) χ2 = 0.07, p = 0.796
Age (years) 25.37 ± 8.36 26.14 ± 7.28 0.350
Smoking habit (yes) 18 (51.4%) 17 (48.6%) χ2 = 0.00, p = 1.00
Physically active subjects 15 (42.9%) 13 (37.1%) χ2 = 0.06, p = 0.807
BMI (kg/m2) 29.26 ± 5.33 29.22 ± 5.62 0.950
Normal-weight (n, %) 7 (20.0%) 10 (28.6%) χ2 = 0.24, p = 0.624
Overweight (n, %) 12 (34.3%) 11 (31.4%) χ2 = 0.00, p = 1.00
Grade I obesity (n, %) 12 (34.3%) 8 (22.9%) χ2 = 0.63, p = 0.427
Grade II obesity (n, %) 4 (11.4%) 6 (17.1%) χ2 = 0.12, p = 0.732
Waist circumference (cm) 92.19 ± 15.19 91.82 ± 15.51 0.833
PREDIMED score 7.68 ± 3.18 8.60 ± 2.31 0.002
PREDIMED categories
Low adherence (n, %) 10 (28.6%) 3 (8.6%) χ2 = 3.40, p = 0.065
Average adherence (n, %) 16 (45.7%) 20 (57.1%) χ2 = 0.52, p = 0.473
High adherence (n, %) 9 (25.7%) 12 (34.3%) χ2 = 0.27, p = 0.602
Total energy intake (kcal) 2233.30 ± 239.57 2271.22 ± 158.14 0.193
BIA parameters
R (Ω) 492.77 ± 76.86 500.60 ± 66.17 0.695
Xc (Ω) 53.26 ± 9.37 59.37 ± 7.81 0.010
PhA (°) 6.18 ± 0.63 6.79 ± 0.60 <0.001

Differences between the two groups were analyzed by Student’s paired t-test. The chi square (χ2) test was used to determine the significance of differences in frequency distribution in categorical variables. Results were expressed as number (%) or mean ± SD. A p value in bold type denotes a significant difference (p < 0.05). HS, hidradenitis suppurativa; BMI, body mass index; PREDIMED, PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea; BIA, bioelectrical impedance analysis; R, resistance; Xc, reactance; PhA, phase angle; SD, standard deviation.