Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 10;13(6):1997. doi: 10.3390/nu13061997

Table 2.

Differences in the Hurley system in demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, nutritional assessments, and BIA parameters in HS patients.

Parameters HS Grade 1
n. (%) or Mean ± SD
n. 12
HS Grade 2
n. (%) or Mean ± SD
n. 23
p-Value
Sex, females (n, %) 8 (66.7%) 16 (69.6%) χ2 = 3.11, p = 0.078
Age (years) 26.25 ± 8.89 24.91 ± 8.23 0.660
Smoking habit (yes) 2 (16.7%) 16 (69.6%) χ2 = 12.63, p = 0.001
Physically active subjects 10 (83.3%) 5 (21.7%) χ2 = 1.36, p = 0.244
BMI (kg/m2) 25.98 ± 4.61 30.97 ± 4.93 0.007
Normal-weight (n, %) 5 (41.7%) 2 (8.7%) χ2 = 0.64, p = 0.426
Overweight (n, %) 4 (33.3%) 8 (34.8%) χ2 = 0.91, p = 0.341
Grade I obesity (n, %) 3 (25.0%) 9 (39.1%) χ2 = 2.51, p = 0.113
Grade II obesity (n, %) 0 (0%) 4 (17.4%) χ2 = 2.39, p = 0.122
Waist circumference (cm) 83.80 ± 16.05 96.57 ± 13.03 0.016
PREDIMED score 9.83 ± 3.48 6.57 ± 2.41 0.003
PREDIMED categories
Low adherence (n, %) 2 (16.7%) 8 (34.8%) χ2 = 2.92, p = 0.087
Average adherence (n, %) 3 (25.0%) 13 (56.5%) χ2 = 6.56, p = 0.010
High adherence (n, %) 7 (58.3%) 2 (8.7%) χ2 = 2.04, p = 0.153
Total energy intake (kcal) 2093.67 ± 168.65 2306.17 ± 241.43 0.005
BIA parameters
R (Ω) 508.50 ± 99.99 484.57 ± 62.65 0.390
Xc (Ω) 53.92 ± 11.68 52.91 ± 8.20 0.769
PhA (°) 6.73 ± 0.60 5.89 ± 0.42 <0.001

The chi square (χ2) test was used to determine the significance of differences in frequency distribution in categorical variables. Differences between the two groups were analyzed by Student’s impaired t-test. Results were expressed as number (%) or mean ± SD. A p value in bold type denotes a significant difference (p < 0.05). HS, hidradenitis suppurativa; BMI, body mass index; PREDIMED, PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea; BIA, bioelectrical impedance analysis; R, resistance; Xc, reactance; PhA, phase angle; SD, standard deviation.