Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 8;10(6):688. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060688

Table 1.

Chemical composition of tested Essential Oils (Eos).

N Components LRI AI Pelargonium graveolens Mentha × piperita Melaleuca alternifolia
AREA% ± SEM SI/MS AREA% ± SEM SI/MS AREA% ± SEM SI/MS
1 propanoic acid, ethylester 712 714 0.12 ± 0.012 86 0.11 ± 0.009 91
2 α-thujene 924 926 0.04 ± 0.001 91 0.88 ± 0.020 91
3 α-pinene 933 933 0.59 ± 0.050 97 1.40 ± 0.010 97 2.14 ± 0.120 96
4 1-methyl-3-(2-methyl-1-propenyl)-cyclopentane 972 972 0.18 ± 0.050 80
5 β-pinene 975 975 1.43 ± 0.500 96
6 trans-carene 977 977 7.72 ± 2.110 91
7 β-myrcene 987 988 0.13 ± 0.100 91
8 2,6-dimethyl- 2,6-octadiene 991 990 1.01 ± 0.090 96
9 3-octanol 995 995 0.13 ± 0.150 90
10 o-cymene 1021 1021 0.10 ± 0.005 91 0.44 ± 0.050 95
11 p-cymene 1025 1025 2.21 ± 0.990 95
12 (Z)−β-ocimene 1027 1027 0.10 ± 0.007 95
13 3-isopropenyl-5,5-dimethyl-cyclopentene 1029 1028 1.68 ± 0.030 81
14 1,8-cineole 1031 1031 9.07 ± 2.090 98 2.13 ± 0.700 98
15 limonene 1033 1033 0.22 ± 0.040 94
16 β-phellandrene 1035 1035 0.53 ± 0.010 91 0.23 ± 0.005 91
17 γ-terpinene a 1058 1060 0.11 ± 0.002 96 17.18 ± 2.120 94
18 cis-linalool oxide 1070 1074 0.37 ± 0.001 90
19 α−terpinolene 1081 1082 3.80 ± 0.020 96
20 linalol 1099 1098 4.68 ± 0.850 95
21 rose oxide 1112 1112 1.67 ± 0.050 90
22 cis-p-menth-2-en-1-ol 1119 1119 0.33 ± 0.005 93
23 p-menthone 1154 1154 2.19 ± 0.970 98
24 iso-menthone a 1164 1165 4.61 ± 1.700 98 23.99 ± 2.490 97
25 menthol a 1168 1169 0.14 + 0.003 91 35.60 + 1.760 91
26 terpinen-4-ol a 1174 1174 33.28 + 2.750 83
27 isopulegone 1177 1177 0.16 + 0.002 96
28 neo-iso-menthol 1187 1188 9.33 + 1.100 96
29 α-terpineol 1191 1190 0.45 + 0.090 80 0.59 + 0.010 87 2.84 + 0.350 86
30 citronellol a 1220 1221 26.15 ± 3.260 98
31 pulegone 1230 1236 0.11 ± 0.010 83 1.21 ± 0.400 98
32 citral 1240 1240 0.70 ± 0.001 96
33 piperitone 1250 1253 1.20 ± 0.030 96
34 geraniol a 1254 1254 11.70 ± 1.020 96
35 citronellyl formate 1272 1275 6.85 ± 0.920 96
36 geraniol formate 1280 1281 2.69 ± 0.100 86
37 menthyl acetate 1294 1294 0.40 ± 0.005 91
38 1,5,5-trimethyl-6-methylen-cyclohexene 1335 1338 0.33 ± 0.070 86
39 citronellyl acetate 1358 1355 0.48 ± 0.050 94
40 neryl acetate 1364 1367 1.47 ± 0.250 86
41 isoledene 1376 1373 1.07 ± 0.090 95
42 β-bourbonene 1380 1382 1.80 ± 0.140 95
43 langifolene 1405 1405 0.12 ± 0.009 90
44 1-H-indene-1-ethylideneocta
hydro-7a-methyl-(1z,3a.a,7a.b)
1410 1409 0.64 ± 0.040 95
45 α-guajene 1413 1413 0.39 ± 0.001 98
46 (E)-caryophyllene 1420 1419 1.63 ± 0.020 99 2.13 ± 0.950 99 1.09 ± 0.013 99
47 β-copaene 1428 1428 1.06 ± 0.015 99
48 neryl propionate 1430 1430 0.15 ± 0.023 80
49 aromadendrene 1440 1440 0.70 ± 0.090 99 4.41 ± 1.090 99
50 citronellyl propionate 1445 1445 1.06 ± 0.030 64
51 humulene 1452 1452 0.38 ± 0.001 97 0.12 ± 0.090 95 0.20 ± 0.001 97
52 α−amorphene 1455 1455 0.87 ± 0.025 96 0.32 ± 0.015 99
53 (E)-β-farnesene 1459 1459 0.10 ± 0.080 95
54 γ−muurolene 1474 1474 0.73 ± 0.055 90 0.15 ± 0.090 83
55 epi-bicyclosesquiphellandrene 1482 1482 1.00 ± 0.078 87
56 4,11-selinadiene 1483 1485 0.18 ± 0.074 92
57 δ−selinene 1490 1493 0.17 ± 0.007 97
58 ledene 1495 1495 3.93 ± 1.670 95
59 δ−cadiene 1524 1524 2.98 ± 0.430 95
60 α-panasinsene 1527 1527 0.16 + 0.009 93
61 α−calacorene 1542 1540 0.11 ± 0.001 91
62 geranyl butyrate 1554 1555 1.49 ± 0.012 96
63 neo-isolongifolene 1558 1558 0.18 ± 0.004 83
64 spathulenol 1578 1578 0.35 ± 0.002 91 0.11 ± 0.008 99
65 phenylethyl tiglate 1584 1584 1.48 + 0.015 90
66 globulol 1585 1585 0.54 ± 0.001 98
67 caryophyllene oxyde 1592 1592 0.28 ± 0.070 95
68 γ−eudesmol a 1620 1619 7.02 ± 2.050 99
69 (E)-citronellyl tiglate 1665 1667 0.38 ± 0.009 91
70 geranyl tiglate 1701 1700 1.57 ± 0.080 91
% Characterized 89.40 96.22 82.78
Others 10.60 3.78 17.22

a: standard compounds. Linear retention index (LRI) on HP-5MS column was experimentally determined using a homologous series of C7–C40 alkanes standard mixture [24]. Arithmetic index (AI) was taken from Adams 4th Ed. (2007) [25] and/or the NIST 2017 Database [26]. Similarity index/mass spectrum (SI/MS) was compared with data reported on NIST 2017 Database and were determined as reported by Koo et al. [27], and Wan et al. [28]. Relative percentage values are means of three determinations with a structural equation modeling (SEM) in all cases below 10%.