Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 9;9(6):1253. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9061253

Table 3.

ANI and AF comparisons for sub-Antarctic strains with type strains of R. erythropolis and R. qingshengii (panel A) and the closest neighbours of strains 1163 and 1168 (panel B), highlighting species identity between strains of R. erythropolis (orange shading) or R. qingshengii (green shading).

Panel A
Strain No. Species Provenance Pairwise ANI and AF (%) a
CCM 2595 NBRC
15567
TUHH-12 JCM 15477 Djl-6-2 1139 1159
CCM 2595 R. erythropolis NCBI reference genome for the species 98.83
AF = 88.64
95.55
AF = 64.79
95.60
AF = 79.47
95.57
AF = 85.27
95.67
AF = 81.41
98.86
AF = 84.01
NBRC 15567 = JCM 3201 b R. erythropolis Type strains, https://lpsn.dsmz.de 98.83
AF = 99.99
95.49
AF = 65.56
95.49
AF = 81.12
95.54
AF = 85.42
95.53
AF = 82.11
98.78
AF = 84.47
TUHH-12 R. qingshengii NCBI-cited genome publication for this species (2015) 95.547
AF = 72.99
95.49
AF = 71.14
98.58
AF = 68.04
98.77
AF = 72.62
98.73
AF = 69.10
95.43
AF = 68.31
JCM 15477 c R. qingshengii Type strain, https://lpsn.dsmz.de 95.60
AF = 89.60
95.49
AF = 88.16
98.57
AF = 68.11
98.83
AF = 89.45
98.67
AF = 85.23
95.47
AF = 83.86
Djl-6-2 R. qingshengii Related to original isolate djl-6 type strain, https://lpsn.dsmz.de 95.57
AF = 85.47
95.54
AF = 85.32
98.79
AF = 66.68
98.82
AF = 82.23
98.91
AF = 82.90
95.53
AF = 80.41
1139 Rhodococcus sp. This study 95.66
AF = 89.01
95.52
AF = 86.46
98.73
AF = 67.09
98.67
AF = 82.59
98.91
AF = 87.35
95.56
AF = 83.34
1159 Rhodococcus sp. This study 98.86
AF = 92.59
98.78
AF = 89.77
95.44
AF = 66.72
95.48
AF = 81.83
95.54
AF = 85.57
95.55
AF = 83.95
Panel B
Strain Species Provenance Pairwise ANI and AF (%)
PAMC 28707 1163 1168
PAMC 28705 PAMC 28707 Rhodococcus sp. (identical strains) Published genome Korean Polar Research Institute (IMG/M) 94.50
AF = 84.60
93.58
AF = 74.36
1163 Rhodococcus sp. This study 94.50
AF = 80.13
93.75
AF = 74.20
1168 Rhodococcus sp. This study 93.55
AF = 79.27
93.74
AF = 83.80

a Average nucleotide identity (ANI) and alignment fraction (AF) were calculated using the IMG/M pairwise ANI tool; shading in panel A shows identity between species. b Genome BLAST (NCBI) indicated that these two strains are identical. c There are two genome sequences in IMG/M for the type strain JCM 15477: genome ID 2744054616 (NCBI GCF_001646745.1) was used for ANI pairwise comparisons here; ANI analysis of JCM 15477 genome ID 2734481946 (NCBI GCA_001313445.1) showed >99% ANI similarity but < 35% AF with genome ID 2744054616 and other strains named as R. qingshengii (Table S1).