Table 3.
Panel A | |||||||||
Strain No. | Species | Provenance | Pairwise ANI and AF (%) a | ||||||
CCM 2595 |
NBRC
15567 |
TUHH-12 | JCM 15477 | Djl-6-2 | 1139 | 1159 | |||
CCM 2595 | R. erythropolis | NCBI reference genome for the species | 98.83 AF = 88.64 |
95.55 AF = 64.79 |
95.60 AF = 79.47 |
95.57 AF = 85.27 |
95.67 AF = 81.41 |
98.86 AF = 84.01 |
|
NBRC 15567 = JCM 3201 b | R. erythropolis | Type strains, https://lpsn.dsmz.de | 98.83 AF = 99.99 |
95.49 AF = 65.56 |
95.49 AF = 81.12 |
95.54 AF = 85.42 |
95.53 AF = 82.11 |
98.78 AF = 84.47 |
|
TUHH-12 | R. qingshengii | NCBI-cited genome publication for this species (2015) | 95.547 AF = 72.99 |
95.49 AF = 71.14 |
98.58 AF = 68.04 |
98.77 AF = 72.62 |
98.73 AF = 69.10 |
95.43 AF = 68.31 |
|
JCM 15477 c | R. qingshengii | Type strain, https://lpsn.dsmz.de | 95.60 AF = 89.60 |
95.49 AF = 88.16 |
98.57 AF = 68.11 |
98.83 AF = 89.45 |
98.67 AF = 85.23 |
95.47 AF = 83.86 |
|
Djl-6-2 | R. qingshengii | Related to original isolate djl-6 type strain, https://lpsn.dsmz.de | 95.57 AF = 85.47 |
95.54 AF = 85.32 |
98.79 AF = 66.68 |
98.82 AF = 82.23 |
98.91 AF = 82.90 |
95.53 AF = 80.41 |
|
1139 | Rhodococcus sp. | This study | 95.66 AF = 89.01 |
95.52 AF = 86.46 |
98.73 AF = 67.09 |
98.67 AF = 82.59 |
98.91 AF = 87.35 |
95.56 AF = 83.34 |
|
1159 | Rhodococcus sp. | This study | 98.86 AF = 92.59 |
98.78 AF = 89.77 |
95.44 AF = 66.72 |
95.48 AF = 81.83 |
95.54 AF = 85.57 |
95.55 AF = 83.95 |
|
Panel B | |||||||||
Strain | Species | Provenance | Pairwise ANI and AF (%) | ||||||
PAMC 28707 | 1163 | 1168 | |||||||
PAMC 28705 PAMC 28707 | Rhodococcus sp. (identical strains) | Published genome Korean Polar Research Institute (IMG/M) | 94.50 AF = 84.60 |
93.58 AF = 74.36 |
|||||
1163 | Rhodococcus sp. | This study | 94.50 AF = 80.13 |
93.75 AF = 74.20 |
|||||
1168 | Rhodococcus sp. | This study | 93.55 AF = 79.27 |
93.74 AF = 83.80 |
a Average nucleotide identity (ANI) and alignment fraction (AF) were calculated using the IMG/M pairwise ANI tool; shading in panel A shows identity between species. b Genome BLAST (NCBI) indicated that these two strains are identical. c There are two genome sequences in IMG/M for the type strain JCM 15477: genome ID 2744054616 (NCBI GCF_001646745.1) was used for ANI pairwise comparisons here; ANI analysis of JCM 15477 genome ID 2734481946 (NCBI GCA_001313445.1) showed >99% ANI similarity but < 35% AF with genome ID 2744054616 and other strains named as R. qingshengii (Table S1).