Table 2.
Species-specific seroprevalence and adjusted odds ratios for the interaction between species and recent RVF reporting.
| Species | No Recent RVF Cases | RVF Recently Reported | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | (n) | aOR | 95% CI | % | (n) | aOR | 95% CI | |
| Sheep | 8.1 | (17,328) | 1 | (Reference) | 21.6 | (10,271) | 2.99 | (2.77, 3.23) |
| Buffalo | 13.8 | (1417) | 1.47 | (1.25, 1.73) | 15.7 | (1523) | 1.85 | (1.16, 2.93) |
| Camels | 10.0 | (4938) | 1.80 | (1.60, 2.03) | 20.5 | (1451) | 2.62 | (1.80, 3.82) |
| Cattle | 13.0 | (22,288) | 1.47 | (1.37, 1.58) | 18.2 | (19,519) | 2.12 | (1.67, 2.69) |
| Goats | 11.9 | (8746) | 1.24 | (1.14, 1.35) | 17.1 | (5968) | 1.83 | (1.38, 2.43) |
Common livestock species were compared to sheep tested when RVF had and had not been recently reported in a country. The logistic regression model also accounted for the year the study was started and the region the work was conducted in (Supplementary Table S7). aOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.