Skip to main content
. 2021 May 27;11(6):966. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11060966

Table 1.

Comparison of hemagglutination inhibition using different concentrations of cells displaying Gp.Mur.

RBC
Agglutination (Preadsorption)
RBC Agglutination: Conventional Tube Method RBC Agglutination: Densitometric Method
(Postadsorption) (Postadsorption)
Adsorbing Cells WT-td Gp.Mur-6C WT-td Gp.Mur-6C
Cell Conc. 1.0 × 105 1.0 × 105 5.0 × 104 2.5 × 104 1.0 × 105 1.0 × 105 5.0 × 104 2.5 × 104
Sample IS a AHG b Grade Grade % inh c Grade % inh Grade % inh Int d Int % inh Int % inh Int % inh
A 3+ 1+ 3+ 0 100 1+ 67 2+ 33 735 0 100 19 97 486 34
B 4+ 3+ 4+ 1+ 75 2+ 50 2+ 50 1858 0 100 163 91 678 64
C 4+ 2+ 3+ 0 100 0 100 1+ 67 442 1 99 82 81 359 19
D 3+ 1+ 4+ 1+ 75 2+ 50 4+ 0 1584 124 92 796 50 1444 9
E 4+ 3+ 4+ 1+ 75 3+ 25 4+ 0 1628 583 64 844 48 1312 19
F 4+ 1+ 3+ 1+ 67 2+ 33 3+ 0 1919 460 76 1245 35 1788 7
G 3+ 3+ 4+ 1+ 75 2+ 50 3+ 25 1232 79 94 660 46 1155 6
H 4+ 1+ 4+ 0 100 1+ 75 2+ 50 2953 0 100 264 91 747 75
I 4+ 1+ 4+ 1+ 75 2+ 50 3+ 25 1538 361 77 730 53 1434 7
J 2+ 3+ 4+ 1+ 75 2+ 50 3+ 25 1228 198 84 687 44 812 34
Average 82 55 28 89 64 27

a Immediate spin phase; b antihuman globulin phase; c % inhibition; d signal intensity.