Table 5.
Health coaching fidelity assessment tool n = 10.
| Health Coaching Fidelity Domain | Mean (SD) | |
|---|---|---|
| HC1 | Did the HC introduce themselves and set the agenda, ensuring that the consultation content is explained to the participant? | 2.6 ± 0.52 |
| HC2 | Did the HC introduce the Action Plan and invite participant to use it to set S.M.A.R.T. goals and record information/tasks? | 1.9 ± 0.32 |
| HC3 | Did the HC encourage participant self-discovery regarding neuropathy and foot protection practices? | 1.4 ± 0.52 |
| HC4 | Did the HC check readiness to adopt the insole and work on foot health goals? | 1.2 ± 0.42 |
| HC5 | Did the HC check importance to adopt the insole and work on foot health goals? | 1.0 ± 0.00 |
| HC6 | Did the HC check knowledge about peripheral neuropathy and foot care practices, while assessing and respecting the participant’s prior knowledge and current actions? | 2.80 ± 0.63 |
| HC7 | Did the HC provide knowledge on neuropathy and daily foot care practices? | 2.67 ± 0.50 |
| HC8 | Did the HC provide knowledge on insole usage? | 3.00 ± 0.00 |
| HC9 | Following education, to what extent did the HC review/reassess participant knowledge and required actions/goals, using techniques, such as Teach Back or having the participant demonstrate tasks etc? | 2.40 ± 0.52 |
| HC10 | Did the HC help the participant to generate options for taking action within the nominated action area? | 1.90 ± 0.57 |
| HC11 | Did the HC promote collaboration to set appropriate participant-centred goals with the participant? | 1.30 ± 0.48 |
| HC12 | Did the HC check importance of nominated goals for both adopting insole and foot health practices? | 1.00 ± 0.00 |
| HC13 | If importance was < 7, did the HC provide knowledge to build importance? | 1.00 ± 0.00 |
| HC14 | Did the HC check confidence to undertake nominated actions to achieve agreed goals related to foot health and insole usage? | 1.50 ± 0.53 |
| HC15 | If confidence was < 7 were concerns discussed and actions simplified? | 1.14 ± 0.38 |
| HC16 | Did the HC discuss supports and resources available to support participant’s action plan attempts? | 2.40 ± 0.52 |
| HC17 | Did the HC establish rapport and demonstrate empathy with the participant throughout the consultation? | 2.40 ± 0.52 |
| Total Health Coaching Score | 30.80 ± 2.04 | |
Scoring system: 1 = Practice was not used, 2 = Practice was used partially, 3 = The practice was use consistently, 0 = NA.