Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 9;36(6):939–954. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab030

Table 1.

List of data extraction variables

Study characteristics

 Intervention(s) Type of HIV and/or syphilis testing activity or programme
 Country Location of study
 Study population Group targeted by intervention(s)
 Setting Service through which the intervention is delivered (e.g. health centre, hospital) and sector (e.g. public/private)
 Time horizon The duration over which costs and/or consequences are calculated
 Study design Randomized controlled trial, cross-sectional, cohort, case–control, modelling
 Type of economic analysis (and ratio if applicable) Cost analysis, cost‐effectiveness, cost‐utility or cost–benefit analysis. Includes ratio used (e.g. cost per DALY averted)
 Data source(s) Primary data collection, expert/stakeholder opinion, published data or literature or combination of those
 Analytical approach to measure costs at scale Econometric, empirical, modelling or a hybrid of these approaches (Kumaranayake, 2008)

Costs of scaling up

 Definition of scaling up As described by authors
 Year (costs) Year of currency values presented (e.g. 2018 dollars)
 Unit(s) of output Choice of output measure (e.g. number of clients tested, number of facilities with testing available)
 Sample size Total number of, e.g facilities, individuals, tests
 Timeframe for decision Short run (fixed inputs cannot be changed) and long run (all inputs can be changed) (Kumaranayake, 2008)
 Cost categories Categorization of costs as defined by author(s)
 Economies/diseconomies of scale How costs changed with scale of output and by how much.
 Empirical results Specific findings related to the costs of scaling up (e.g. coefficients of scale)
 Key drivers of costs identified Key drivers of the costs of scaling up (e.g. geography, population sub-group, type of providers)