Study characteristics |
|
Intervention(s) |
Type of HIV and/or syphilis testing activity or programme |
Country |
Location of study |
Study population |
Group targeted by intervention(s) |
Setting |
Service through which the intervention is delivered (e.g. health centre, hospital) and sector (e.g. public/private) |
Time horizon |
The duration over which costs and/or consequences are calculated |
Study design |
Randomized controlled trial, cross-sectional, cohort, case–control, modelling |
Type of economic analysis (and ratio if applicable) |
Cost analysis, cost‐effectiveness, cost‐utility or cost–benefit analysis. Includes ratio used (e.g. cost per DALY averted) |
Data source(s) |
Primary data collection, expert/stakeholder opinion, published data or literature or combination of those |
Analytical approach to measure costs at scale |
Econometric, empirical, modelling or a hybrid of these approaches (Kumaranayake, 2008) |
|
Costs of scaling up |
|
Definition of scaling up |
As described by authors |
Year (costs) |
Year of currency values presented (e.g. 2018 dollars) |
Unit(s) of output |
Choice of output measure (e.g. number of clients tested, number of facilities with testing available) |
Sample size |
Total number of, e.g facilities, individuals, tests |
Timeframe for decision |
Short run (fixed inputs cannot be changed) and long run (all inputs can be changed) (Kumaranayake, 2008) |
Cost categories |
Categorization of costs as defined by author(s) |
Economies/diseconomies of scale |
How costs changed with scale of output and by how much. |
Empirical results |
Specific findings related to the costs of scaling up (e.g. coefficients of scale) |
Key drivers of costs identified |
Key drivers of the costs of scaling up (e.g. geography, population sub-group, type of providers) |