Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 5;11(6):1683. doi: 10.3390/ani11061683

Table 2.

Pregnancy rates after endometrial sampling in cattle.

Author Study Design Sampled (n) Control (n) Intervention (#) Interval Procedure-Breeding PR Sampled (%) PR Control (%)
Etheringthon et al. [29]) RCS 92 69 EB NM 37 39
(4)
Kauffman et al. [20] CS 201 103 CB 4 h 43.3 41.7
(1)
Cheong et al. [18] CS 705 1992 UL
(1)
19.4 d (SEM = 0.4) PRI 31.2
MUL 29.1
36.5
28.1
Goshen et al. [31] CC 44 157 EB
(1)
40.5 d
(5–111)
44.4 38.9
Pugliesi et al. [27] EB (1) EB 31.6; UL 28.6 ** 40.5 **
CS 73 37 6 d *
UL (1) EB 26.3; UL 17.1 *** 40.5 ***
Thome et al. [30] RCS 93 35 UL (1) 4 h after AI 57 ± 5.1 54 ± 8.4
Martins et al. [28]) CS 46 16 UL (1) 6 d, 3 d and 0.5 d *** Day 1 (60)
Day 4 (29.4)
Day 7 (37.5)
62.5

RCS: randomized controlled study; CS: cohort study; CC: case control study; UL: uterine lavage; EB: endometrial biopsy; CB: cytobrush; AI artificial insemination;* time of breeding after intervention; ** 30 days of pregnancy assessment after breeding; *** 60 days of pregnancy assessment after breeding *** interval from UL to embryo transfer (ET)(day 7.5 postoestrus).