Skip to main content
. 2021 May 25;11(6):1546. doi: 10.3390/ani11061546

Table 3.

Percentage of dissected keel bones with/without several damages in hens of the second generation.

Trait Floor Housing Single Cages
BLA L68 WLA R11 BLA L68 WLA R11
n = 92 n = 90 n = 74 n = 96 n = 72 n = 71 n = 70 n = 70
Percentage of keel bones with/without deformities 1
Score 4 68.09 91.11 54.05 70.83 30.56 61.97 11.43 5.71
Score 3 22.34 8.89 28.38 22.92 25.00 30.99 28.57 35.71
Score 2 9.57 0 17.57 6.25 44.44 7.04 60.00 58.57
Significance BC A C B D BC E E
Direction of keel bone deformity 2
Score 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.49
Score 1 38.71 97.50 52.94 60.71 24.00 40.74 19.67 11.94
Score 2 61.29 12.50 47.06 39.29 76.00 59.26 80.33 86.57
Significance BC A AB AB CD BC D D
Percentage of keel bones with/without fractures 3
Score 0 41.49 67.78 25.68 50.00 59.72 94.37 74.29 85.51
Score 1 58.51 32.22 74.32 50.00 40.28 5.63 25.71 14.49
Significance B DE A BC CDE G EF FG
Percentage of numbers of fractures in the caudal third of fractured keel bones
1 50.91 71.43 34.55 70.83 58.62 100 43.75 100
2 29.09 25.00 29.09 22.92 24.14 0 31.25 0
3 7.27 0 14.55 6.25 6.90 0 18.75 0
≥4 12.73 3.57 21.82 0 10.34 0 6.25 0
Significance AB BCD A CD ABCD ABCD AD BC

1 Scoring system: 4 = no deformity, 3 = slight deformity, 2 = moderate to severe deformity. 2 Scoring system: 0 = sagittal, 1 = transverse, 2 = sagittal and transverse. 3 Scoring system: 0 = fracture absent, 1 = fracture present. A–G: Overall frequencies within a row with no common letter differ significantly at p < 0.05.