Table 6.
Association of CVDs with DM & HT#
| CVD status | OR | 95% CI | Wald χ2multiplicative | P multiplicative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total CVD Model 1 | ||||
| -DM & -HT | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| + DM & -HT | 2.53 | (1.81, 3.55) | ||
| -DM & + HT | 4.35 | (3.72, 5.09) | ||
| + DM & + HT | 7.51 | (5.86, 9.63) | ||
| DM × HT | 3.321 | 0.068 | ||
| Stroke Model 2 | ||||
| -DM & -HT | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| + DM & -HT | 2.71 | (1.20, 6.14) | ||
| -DM & + HT | 4.78 | (3.20, 7.14) | ||
| + DM & + HT | 5.25 | (2.93, 9.40) | ||
| DM × HT | 3.368 | 0.066 | ||
| CHD Model 3 | ||||
| -DM & -HT | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| + DM & -HT | 2.44 | (1.72, 3.45) | ||
| -DM & + HT | 4.12 | (3.50, 4.84) | ||
| + DM & + HT | 7.49 | (5.82, 9.64) | ||
| DM × HT | 1.815 | 0.178 | ||
# Gender, age, education level, marital status, smoking, drinking, regular exercise, obesity, and central obesity were adjusted for in Model 1 and Model 3; Age, marital status, smoking, drinking, regular exercise, and central obesity were adjusted for in Model 2; Ref, reference.