Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2021 Jun 5;11(6):360. doi: 10.3390/metabo11060360

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2021 by the authors.

Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

PMC Copyright notice

(A). Scatter plot of donor distance outcomes. Distance from Westmead (NPTU) in kilometers is shown for each analysis group, and the mean of each group is marked and labelled. Negative local (■ n = 65), positive local (▲ n = 30), negative non-local (▼ n = 129), positive non-local (◆ n = 41), all negative (● n = 194), all positive (☐ n= 71). (B). Box plot of donor distance zone vs. CIT. The CIT is shown for each distance zone, and outliers are represented by 🞶 on the graph. <50 km n = 71, 50–150 km n = 12, 151–400 km n = 9, 401–800 km n = 76, 801–1200 km n = 31, 1201–4000 n = 17. From local (zone 1) to zone 2, the mean CIT increases from 279.6 to 337.6 min which was statistically different (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the mean CIT from zone 2 to zone 3 (385.1 min) (p = 0.182), from zone 3 to zone 4 (474.8 min) (p = 0.009) and from zone 4 to zone 5 (504.9 min) (p = 0.171) (each zone representing a distance of 250 to 400 km). There was also a significant increase in CIT when a donor pancreas was received from zone 6 compared to zone 5 (p = 0.109), as zone 6 represents a distance of 2800 km further than zone 5 (mean CIT 560.6 min). (C). Scatter plot of CIT Outcomes. CIT in minutes is shown for each analysis group, the mean of each group is marked and labelled. Negative local (■ n = 67), positive local (▲ n = 32), negative non-local (▼ n = 86), positive non-local (◆ n = 33), all negative (● n = 153), all positive (☐ n = 65). CIT was statistically significant between local and non-local groups (p < 0.01).

(A). Scatter plot of donor distance outcomes. Distance from Westmead (NPTU) in kilometers is shown for each analysis group, and the mean of each group is marked and labelled. Negative local (■ n = 65), positive local (▲ n = 30), negative non-local (▼ n = 129), positive non-local (◆ n = 41), all negative (● n = 194), all positive (☐ n= 71). (B). Box plot of donor distance zone vs. CIT. The CIT is shown for each distance zone, and outliers are represented by 🞶 on the graph. <50 km n = 71, 50–150 km n = 12, 151–400 km n = 9, 401–800 km n = 76, 801–1200 km n = 31, 1201–4000 n = 17. From local (zone 1) to zone 2, the mean CIT increases from 279.6 to 337.6 min which was statistically different (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the mean CIT from zone 2 to zone 3 (385.1 min) (p = 0.182), from zone 3 to zone 4 (474.8 min) (p = 0.009) and from zone 4 to zone 5 (504.9 min) (p = 0.171) (each zone representing a distance of 250 to 400 km). There was also a significant increase in CIT when a donor pancreas was received from zone 6 compared to zone 5 (p = 0.109), as zone 6 represents a distance of 2800 km further than zone 5 (mean CIT 560.6 min). (C). Scatter plot of CIT Outcomes. CIT in minutes is shown for each analysis group, the mean of each group is marked and labelled. Negative local (■ n = 67), positive local (▲ n = 32), negative non-local (▼ n = 86), positive non-local (◆ n = 33), all negative (● n = 153), all positive (☐ n = 65). CIT was statistically significant between local and non-local groups (p < 0.01).