Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 24;21:1221. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11318-2

Table 1.

The results of bivariate analysis between the type of place of residence (urban-rural) and other variables of respondents in the Philippines (n = 7992) and Indonesia (n = 14,568) in 2017

Variables Philippine
(n = 7992)
Indonesia
(n = 14,568)
Urban
(2602)
Rural
(5390)
p Urban
(7322)
Rural
(7246)
p
ANC ***0.000 ***0.000
• < 4 11.3% 15.0% 3.9% 7.3%
• ≥ 4 88.7% 85.0% 96.1% 92.7%
Age group ***0.000 ***0.000
• 15–19 3.9% 4.9% 1.9% 2.9%
• 20–24 19.9% 21.1% 13.9% 19.2%
• 25–29 27.8% 25.2% 25.0% 25.6%
• 30–34 22.4% 20.8% 26.8% 24.6%
• 35–39 15.4% 17.4% 21.8% 18.4%
• 40–44 8.6% 8.3% 8.8% 7.5%
• 45–49 1.9% 2.2% 1.7% 1.8%
Have a husband/partner ***0.000 ***0.000
• No 10.2% 6.5% 2.9% 2.8%
• Yes 89.8% 93.5% 97.1% 97.2%
Education Level ***0.000 ***0.000
• No education 0.4% 1.4% 0.4% 1.0%
• Primary 11.4% 20.2% 17.5% 32.5%
• Secondary 52.6% 50.6% 62.6% 55.8%
• Higher 35.6% 27.9% 19.6% 10.8%
Parity ***0.000 ***0.000
• Primiparous 31.7% 27.0% 33.7% 34.0%
• Multiparous 57.8% 55.1% 62.6% 60.3%
• Grand multiparous 10.5% 17.9% 3.7% 5.7%
Wealth status ***0.000 ***0.000
• Poorest 12.3% 35.5% 6.6% 29.9%
• Poorer 16.7% 26.1% 13.4% 26.7%
• Middle 25.3% 16.4% 21.1% 20.8%
• Richer 24.1% 12.6% 27.3% 14.9%
• Richest 21.6% 9.3% 31.6% 7.8%

p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001