Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 11;15:689193. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.689193

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Expression of PSD-95, synapsin, NR1, NR2A, and NR2B in the PFC of nMK-801(p7–14; n = 6) and nMK-801 (p11–15; n = 6) compared to their respective saline-treated controls (n = 6 for each of the control group). (A) No differences are identified in the PSD95 relative density in the PFC of nMK-801 (p7–14) compared to saline-treated (t-test, p = 0.8). (B) No differences are identified in the synapsin relative density in the PFC of nMK-801 (p7–14) compared to saline-treated (t-test, p = 0.3). (C) No differences are identified in the NR1 relative density in the PFC of nMK-801 (p7–14) compared to saline-treated (t-test, p = 0.8). (D) No differences are identified in the NR2A relative density in the PFC of nMK-801 (p7–14) compared to saline-treated (t-test, p = 0.35). (E) No differences are identified in the NR2B relative density in the PFC of nMK-801 (p7–14) compared to saline-treated (t-test, p = 0.35). (F) No differences are identified in the PSD95 relative density in the PFC of nMK-801 (p11–15) compared to saline-treated (t-test, p = 0.4). (G) No differences are identified in the synapsin relative density in the PFC of nMK-801 (p11–15) compared to saline-treated (t-test, p = 0.15). (H) No differences are identified in the NR1 relative density in the PFC of nMK-801 (p11–15) compared to saline-treated (t-test, p = 0.9). (I) No differences are identified in the NR2A relative density in the PFC of nMK-801 (p11–15) compared to saline-treated (t-test, p = 0.8). (J) No differences are identified in the NR2B relative density in the PFC of nMK-801 (p11–15) compared to saline-treated (t-test, p = 0.9).