Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 21;21(2):24. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5529

Appendix 1.

Allocation of Phases, suggested methods and the corresponding research items.


PHASE SUGGESTED NAME OF PHASE/OBJECTIVE SUITABLE METHODS OR INSTRUMENTS

0 State of the art research, including theoretical foundations for user acceptance [35,44] Desk research

1 Analysing the user requirements [8,32,35,37,38,86,87,88,89,90,91] and the context of use [92,93] Direct observations [32,89]
Use cases [20,35,38]
Expert panels of patients and health care providers [90]
Workshops with patients [93]
Semi-structured and field interviews with patients [35,37,38,88,89,90], their relatives, health care providers [32,35,37,38] and hospital managers [37]
Quantitative surveys with patients [20,91]
Focus groups with patients [32,38,87] and health care providers [87,88,93]
Personas and user profiles of patients [20,32,35,86] and health care providers [35,86]
Field studies [32,88]

2 Concept development [38] and deduction of characteristics of the prototype [37,86,87,88,89,91,92] based on an in-depth understanding of the user requirements [8,32,35,86,88,90,92,93] and context of use [8,90] Use cases [38]
Focus groups with patients [38] and health care providers [37]
Semi-structured interviews with patients [38,88] and health care providers [38]
Paper Prototyping or Sketching of the intended applications [20,35,88,90]
Personas of patients [90]
Prototyping [32,35,86,87,88,89]

3 Development [8,32,35,38,86,87,89,90,92,93] and adaption [32,86,87] of the prototype based on a first evaluation [8,20,35,37,86,87,88,89,91,92] of its usability in controlled environments Cognitive walkthrough with health care providers [20]
Heuristic evaluation with non-users [20,93]
Think aloud studies with health care providers [20,88,92], patients [88,92,93] and their relatives [89]
Interview [87,89,90]
Quantitative surveys with patients [20,37,88,90,91,93] and health care providers [20,87,88], using usability questionnaires

4 Evaluating [8,32,37,38,86,89,93] and adapting [37,91,93] the application in terms of usability and user acceptance under real-life conditions Field studies [88]
Focus groups with health care providers [37]
Quantitative surveys with patients [20,37,88,90,91,93] and health care providers [20,88], using usability questionnaires

5 Implementation [32,35,37,91,92] of the full-scale application and long-term evaluation [35,37,90,93] Semi-structured interview with patients [38,92] and health care providers [92]