Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 12;11(6):547. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060547

Table A4.

Characteristics of patients firstly treated with CLI, DBS as second treatment—reported in literature.

Faust-Socher et al., 2019 Nathoo et al., 2019 Nathoo et al., 2019 Spanaki et al., 2020
Case Case 1 Case 1 Case 2 Combined data (n = 2)
Sex M:F F M M UA
Age at PD diagnosis in years; range (mean) 29 45 56 UA
Age at initiation first treatment in years; range (mean) 37 57 64 UA
Interval between initiation treatments in years; range (mean) 8 2 2 UA
Initial effect of first treatment UA Good Good UA
DBS target R/L GPi R/L STN R/L GPi STN
Initial therapy continued UA No No UA
Indication for second treatment Dyskinesia, painful dystonia MFD MFD, dystonia Levodopa induced symptoms
LEDD pre-CLI; range (mean) UA UA UA UA
LEDD post-CLI; range (mean) 1179 UA UA UA
UPDRS-III med off pre-DBS; range (mean) 34 49 23 UA
UPDRS -III med on pre-DBS; range (mean) 19 32 22 UA
Improvement according to authors Yes Yes Yes UA

CLI: continuous levodopa/carbidopa infusion; DBS: deep drain stimulation; F: female; GPi: globus pallidus interna; LEDD: levodopa equivalent daily dose; M: male; med: medication; MF: unpredictable motor fluctuations; MFD: unpredictable motor fluctuations and dyskinesias; PD: Parkinson’s disease; R/L: right/left; STN: subthalamic nucleus; UA: unavailable; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, part III.