Table 4.

Mean ± SE of data for RPW larvae that were treated with thymol derivatives.

Treatment	Concentration (ppm)	Consumption (g/day)	RGR (g/g day)	RCR (g/g day)	ECI	FDI (%)
Control	0	0.386 ± 0.013 *	−0.011 ± 0.01	0.316 ± 0.039 a	−9.156 ±1.8 ab	-
WNT1	200	0.213 ± 0.001 b,B	−0.002 ± 0.01	0.075 ± 0.010 b	−5.213 ± 7.496	44.72 a,A
	400	0.221 ± 0.001 b,C	−0.012 ± 0.01	0.089 ± 0.005 b	−12.146 ± 8.568	42.64 a,A
	600	0.206 ± 0.0006 a,A	−0.027 ± 0.01	0.101 ± 0.015 b	−27.446 ± 4.889	46.52 b,A
WNT2	200	0.178 ± 0.003 a,A	−0.005 ± 0.00	0.096 ± 0.015 b	0.489 ± 5.774	53.88 b,B
	400	0.189 ± 0.004 a,B	−0.011 ± 0.02	0.121 ± 0.043 b	1.459 ± 14.451	50.91 b,B
	600	0.227 ± 0.001 b,C	0.001 ± 0.02	0.116 ± 0.007 b	3.523 ± 16.979	41.14 ab,A
WNT4	200	0.222 ± 0.002 c,A	−0.024 ± 0.01	0.109 ± 0.024 b	−21.626 ± 1.375	42.49 a,A
	400	0.240 ± 0.002 c,B	−0.009 ± 0.00	0.081 ± 0.009 b	−11.349 ± 3.949	37.64 a,A
	600	0.227 ± 0.0005 b,A	−0.009 ± 0.00	0.073 ± 0.004 b	−11.906 ± 1.095	41.10 ab,A
WNT5	200	0.229 ± 0.001 c,A	0.005 ± 0.00	0.092 ± 0.003 b	0.175 ± 2.723	40.62 a,A
	400	0.237 ± 0.003 c,AB	−0.014 ± 0.01	0.102 ± 0.015 b	−11.607 ± 2.622	38.58 a,A
	600	0.238 ± 0.0007 c,B	−0.003 ± 0.01	0.110 ± 0.008 b	−3.595 ± 4.371	38.13 a,A

The symbol * indicates that it is significantly higher in all the other treatments (p < 0.05). The same small letter indicates that no significant difference exists between the derivatives at the same concentration levels (p > 0.05). The same capital letter indicates that there were no significant differences between concentrations in each derivative (p > 0.05).