Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 13;11(6):552. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060552

Table 3.

Risk differences between robotic and laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomies. CI: confidence interval; POPF: postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Outcome Studies Risk Difference
[95% CI] (<1 Favors Robotic)
Test of Heterogeneity Quantification of
Heterogeneity
Chi2 p
Spleen preserving failure 16–26 −0.25 [−0.30, −0.19] 27.22 0.002 df = 10; I2 = 63%
Open conversions 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, 24–26 −0.05 [−0.09, −0.01] 9.41 0.22 df = 7; I2 = 26%
Overall complications 16–19, 21, 25, 26 −0.06 [−0.14, 0.02] 2.15 0.91 df = 6; I2 = 0%
Complications—Clavien–Dindo grade 1–2 16, 18, 21 −0.02 [−0.15, 0.11] 1.00 0.61 df = 2; I2 = 0%
Complications—Clavien–Dindo grade ≥3 16, 18, 21, 22, 25, 26 −0.04 [−0.11, 0.03] 4.82 0.44 df = 5; I2 = 0%
POPF grade B/C 16–18, 21, 22, 25, 26 0.00 [−0.06, 0.07] 3.34 0.77 df = 6; I2 = 0%
Biochemical leaks 16–18, 21, 26 −0.04 [−0.14, 0.05] 1.01 0.91 df = 4; I2 = 0%
Intra-/post-operative blood
transfusions
16, 17, 19, 21, 25, 26 −0.03 [−0.09, 0.04] 5.49 0.36 df = 5; I2 = 9%
Reoperation rate 16, 17, 21, 22, 26 0.01 [−0.05, 0.07] 3.86 0.42 df = 4; I2 = 0%
Hospital length of stay 16–19, 21, 22, 25, 26 −1.52 [−2.84, −0.20] 25.16 <0.001 df = 7; I2 = 72%