Table 3.
Linear Regression Predicting Change in Cognitive Ability
Unadjusted* | Adjusted** | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
B | p | B | p | |
Predictor | ||||
BICS self-regulation development (negative = less difficulties) | −3.35 | .008 | −2.73 | .023 |
Covariates | ||||
Typically-verbal group (reference = minimally-verbal group) | 6.79 | .012 | 6.81 | .010 |
Age | −1.84 | .084 | −1.95 | .055 |
Sex: male (reference = female) | −1.77 | .477 | ||
Race: black (reference = white) | −0.56 | .795 | ||
Ethnicity: hispanic (reference = non-hispanic) | 1.94 | .345 | ||
Income (reference = > $60,000): | ||||
< $20,000 | −1.11 | .710 | ||
$20,000 – $40,000 | 0.93 | .784 | ||
$40,000 – $60,000 | −2.77 | .446 | ||
DAS-II General Conceptual Ability (standard score): Time 1 | 0.96 | < .001 | 0.85 | < .001 |
All analyses included random effects for classroom.
Controlling only for DAS-II Time 1 score.
Criterion for entering covariates into adjusted model was a bivariate association (unadjusted model) of p < .2 (Hosmer and Lemeshow, 2000).