Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 15;26(12):3660. doi: 10.3390/molecules26123660

Table 4.

Effect of different treatments on the markers of liver function (AST, ALT and ALP).

Group AST, Percent * ALT, Percent * ALP, Percent *
Normal control 22.7 ± 1.28 a 48.8 ± 1.35 a 141.3 ± 6.75 a
Negative control 50.8 ± 3.05 d, 122% (↑) 116 ± 3.27 d, 137.5% (↑) 232.9 ± 10.5 c, 64.8% (↑)
MTX treated group 66.3 ± 2.52 f, 31.1% (↑) 159.8 ± 6.58 g, 37.8% (↑) 378.3 ± 8.85 f, 62.4% (↑)
Ethanolic extract (100 mg/Kg b.wt) 40.3 ± 1.33 c, 19.9% (↓) 101.5 ± 3.22 c,12.5% (↓) 176.8 ± 5.92 b, 24.1% (↓)
Ethanolic extract (200 mg/Kg b.wt) 29.8 ± 1.17 b, 40.7% (↓) 74.2 ± 2.41 b, 36.1% (↓) 156.6 ± 3.98 a,b, 32.8% (↓)
MTX + ethanolic extract (100 mg/Kg b.wt) 62.3 ± 2.96 e,f, 23.8% (↑) 145.7 ± 3.80 f, 25.6% (↑) 328.6 ± 7.33 e, 41.1% (↑)
MTX + ethanolic extract (200 mg/Kg b.wt) 56.7 ± 1.94 e, 12.6% (↑) 131 ± 5.7 e, 12.6% (↑) 274.1 ± 13.2 d, 17.1% (↑)

AST, aspartate amino transferase (U/mL); ALT, alanine transaminase (U/mL); and ALP, alkaline phosphatase (U/L).* percentage increase or inhibition. Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6 rats). In the same column, the presence of different letters (a–f) indicating a significant difference between groups using ANOVA in SPSS software (at p < 0.05), the letter “a” is the nearest result to the control while letter ”f” is the furthest from the control group.