Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 26;71(2):373–386. doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-02990-9

Table 2.

Pooled adjusted and unadjusted effects of prior ICI exposure on COVID-19 outcomes

Outcome Studies Events/N OR (95% CI) Heterogeneity
ICI No ICI I2 P-value
Adjusted effects
Mortalitya,b 5 [26, 28, 30, 32, 33] 30/122c 237/963c 0.70 (0.40–1.23) 0% 0.606
Subgroup analysis
  Sample size
    < 100 patients 3 [28, 30, 32] 18/72c 12/108c 0.71 (0.29–1.73) 0% 0.595
    ≥ 100 patients 2 [26, 33] 12/50 223/855 0.90 (0.22–3.69) 40% 0.195
  Risk of bias
   Low 2 [26, 30] 21/83 221/784 0.68 (0.34–1.35) 0% 0.451
   Moderate/High 3 [28, 32, 33] 9/39c 16/179c 0.75 (0.27–2.15) 6% 0.346
  Location
   Asia 1 [33] 2/6 7/99 3.03 (0.29–31.98) NA NA
   Europe 2 [26, 28] 10/52c 216/811c 0.63 (0.31–1.25) 0% 0.749
   America 2 [30, 32] 18/64 14/53 0.67 (0.22–2.05) 2% 0.314
  Adjuvant therapy
   ICI monotherapy 1 [28] NR NR 0.15 (0.01–1.65) NA NA
   ICI + chemotherapy 1 [28] NR NR 1.96 (0.29–13.18) NA NA
Severityd,e 3 [30, 33] 19/45 132/546 1.62 (0.48–5.43) 57% 0.095
Subgroup analysis
  Adjuvant therapy
   ICI monotherapy 1 [28] NR NR 0.26 (0.03–1.88) NA NA
   ICI + chemotherapy 1 [28] NR NR 0.97 (0.14–6.45) NA NA
Hospitalizationd,e 1 [31] 18/29 150/382 2.84 (1.22–6.72) NA NA
Unadjusted effects
Mortalityb 8 [2426, 29, 30, 3234] 51/198 317/1241 0.91 (0.60–1.38) 2% 0.411
Subgroup analysis
  Sample size
   < 100 patients 4 [24, 25, 30, 32] 21/89 28/133 0.95 (0.46–1.94) 0% 0.609
   ≥ 100 patients 4 [26, 29, 33, 34] 30/109 289/1108 1.05 (0.51–2.18) 44% 0.150
  Risk of bias
   Low 5 [24, 26, 29, 30, 34] 39/145 295/1089 0.89 (0.56–1.41) 0% 0.450
   Moderate/High 3 [25, 32, 33] 12/53 22/152 1.06 (0.34–3.25) 42% 0.178
  Location
   Asia 1 [33] 2/6 7/99 4.45 (0.72–27.44) NA NA
   Europe 3 [2426] 13/69 13/836 0.60 (0.30–1.22) 0% 0.989
   America 3 [29, 30, 32] 20/71 30/167 1.30 (0.61–2.78) 0% 0.389
   International 1 [34] 16/52 50/139 0.79 (0.40–1.57) NA NA
  Cancer type
   Lung cancer 3 [30, 33, 34] 28/96 58/184 0.98 (0.55–1.74) 0% 0.495
   Non-lung solid cancer 3 [25, 29, 33] 6/30 26/215 4.00 (0.30–52.88) 87%  < 0.001
  Adjuvant therapy
   ICI monotherapy 4 [25, 29, 33, 34] 16/60 128/380 0.88 (0.43–1.81) 6% 0.364
   ICI + chemotherapy 3 [29, 33, 34] 7/23 76/352 1.12 (0.34–3.70) 46% 0.159
  Comparator groupf
   No treatment 5 [2426, 33, 34] 32/127 120/421 0.86 (0.42–1.77) 34% 0.193
   Chemotherapyg 5 [25, 26, 29, 33, 34] 33/131 106/334 0.83 (0.46–1.51) 16% 0.310
   Targeted therapy 5 [24, 26, 29, 33, 34] 30/112 26/120 1.19 (0.63–2.22) 0% 0.753
   Surgery 3 [26, 29, 33] 14/57 11/48 1.11 (0.45–2.77) 0% 0.840
   Radiotherapy 3 [26, 29, 33] 15/57 20/98 2.03 (0.48–8.66) 36% 0.212
   Hormone therapy 2 [26, 29] 13/51 22/73 1.43 (0.12–16.47) 59% 0.117
Severityb,d,h,i 6 [25, 2729, 31, 33] 72/130 699/1522 1.47 (0.95–2.27) 5% 0.384
Subgroup analysis
  Sample size
   < 100 patients 2 [25, 28] 18/30 54/100 1.99 (0.50–7.86) 2% 0.313
   ≥ 100 patients 4 [27, 29, 31, 33] 41/83 658/1439 1.40 (0.82–2.40) 26% 0.258
  Location
   Asia 1 [33] 4/6 36/99 3.50 (0.61–20.06) NA NA
   Europe 3 [25, 27, 28] 55/86 569/917 1.05 (0.61–1.78) 0% 0.925
   America 2 [29, 31] 13/38 94/506 2.35 (1.14–4.83) 0% 0.322
  Cancer type
   Lung cancerj 2 [30, 33] 18/44 17/43 1.27 (0.51–3.19) 0% 0.758
   Non-lung solid cancer 4 [25, 29, 31, 33] 22/49 97/445 1.49 (0.72–3.07) 0% 0.407
  Adjuvant therapy
   ICI monotherapy 4 [25, 29, 31, 33] 22/44 175/633 1.25 (0.56–2.79) 0% 0.579
   ICI + chemotherapy 3 [29, 31, 33] 10/15 112/605 8.72 (3.03–25.11) 0% 0.703
  Comparator groupf
   No treatment 3 [25, 31, 33] 31/59 68/285 2.39 (1.24–4.62) 0% 0.490
   Chemotherapy 5 [25, 28, 29, 31, 33] 35/74 60/230 1.75 (0.84–3.67) 0% 0.592
   Targeted therapy 3 [28, 31, 33] 19/45 19/77 2.17 (0.95–4.93) 0% 0.499
   Surgery 2 [29, 33] 5/13 7/19 0.99 (0.18–5.35) 0% 0.788
   Radiotherapy 2 [29, 33] 6/13 4/22 5.91 (0.98–35.71) 0% 0.836
   Hormone therapy 2 [28, 29] 5/15 5/19 1.33 (0.25–6.98) 0% 0.421
Hospitalizationb,d,i 5 [25, 29, 31, 32, 34] 99/137 368/694 1.04 (0.49–2.22) 53% 0.076
Subgroup analysis
  Sample size
   < 100 patients 2 [25, 32] 35/47 47/53 0.36 (0.09–1.40) 21% 0.261
   ≥ 100 patients 3 [29, 31, 34] 64/90 321/641 1.60 (0.92–2.79) 12% 0.321
  Risk of bias
   Low 2 [29, 34] 46/61 171/259 1.15 (0.59–2.25) 0% 0.970
   Moderate/High 3 [25, 31, 32] 53/76 197/435 0.74 (0.15–3.65) 76% 0.016
  Cancer type
   Lung cancerj 2 [30, 34] 69/94 172/193 1.32 (0.72–2.39) 0% 0.570
   Non-lung solid cancer 3 [25, 29, 31] 28/46 167/358 1.07 (0.52–2.17) 0% 0.559
  Adjuvant therapy
   ICI monotherapy 4 [25, 29, 31, 34] 51/74 344/669 1.06 (0.59–1.89) 0% 0.772
   ICI + chemotherapy 3 [29, 31, 34] 26/31 321/641 2.10 (0.37–12.03) 62% 0.073
  Comparator groupf
   No treatment 3 [25, 31, 34] 76/105 135/269 1.25 (0.46–3.40) 61% 0.075
   Chemotherapy 4 [25, 29, 31, 34] 80/112 112/223 1.49 (0.66–3.33) 42% 0.159
   Targeted therapy 3 [29, 31, 34] 64/90 52/124 2.54 (1.37–4.72) 0% 0.919
   Surgery 1 [29] 5/7 5/11 3.00 (0.40–22.71) NA NA
   Radiotherapy 1 [29] 5/7 4/9 3.13 (0.38–25.57) NA NA
   Hormone therapy 1 [29] 5/7 4/9 3.13 (0.38–25.57) NA NA
ICU admissione 2 [25, 32] 6/47 13/53 0.38 (0.12–1.16) 0% 0.967
Prolonged hospitalization (> 8 days)e 1 [34] 10/17 21/41 1.36 (0.43–4.27) NA NA
Subgroup analysis
  Adjuvant therapy
   ICI + chemotherapy 1 [34] 3/7 21/41 0.71 (0.14–3.60) NA NA

aOverlapping populations were observed between Pinato et al. [27] with Garassino et al. [34] and Lee et al.[26], of which Pinato et al.[27] was excluded due to smaller cumulative sample size

bSubgroup analysis based on study design was not performed due to paucity of studies (< 2 subsets with ≥ 2 studies)

cThe event rate may be underestimated as Yarza et al.[28] did not provide the number of deaths among patients receiving and not receiving ICI

dOverlapping populations were observed between Luo et al.[30] and Robilotti et al.[31], of which Robilotti[31] et al. was prioritized due to larger sample size

eA priori-determined subgroup and sensitivity analysis was not performed due to paucity of studies

fFor study-specific estimates, see Supplementary Table S5

gAssaad et al. was excluded as both arms had no events[24]

hSubgroup analysis based on risk of bias was not performed due to paucity of studies (< 2 subsets with ≥ 2 studies)

iSubgroup analysis based on study location was not performed due to paucity of studies (< 2 subsets with ≥ 2 studies)

jOverlapping lung cancer patients were observed between Luo et al.[30] and Robilotti et al.[31], of which Luo et al.[30] was prioritized due to larger sample size. CI, confidence interval; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; ICU, intensive care unit; OR, odds ratio