Skip to main content
. 2021 May 19;11(2):148–160. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.19

Table 1. Core characteristics of the studies included in Systematic review and Meta-analysis .

Author Year Study design Study location Quality assessment Sample size Focusing group Questionnaire administration Outcome Quality a References
Ghosh et al 2020 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Kolkata <75% 250 Nurses Face-to-face Positive knowledge 6 8
Joshi et al 2020 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Jodhpur <75% 1200 Slums Face-to-face Positive knowledge 6 9
Vittal and Murthy 2020 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Andhra Pradesh <75% 234 Medical and nursing students Self-administered Poor knowledge and positive attitude 3 10
Kumar 2020 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Uttar Pradesh <75% 195 Female sex workers Face-to-face Positive knowledge 5 11
Sinha et al 2020 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Alipurduar <75% 90 Female sex workers Face-to-face Positive knowledge, negative attitude and positive practice 6 12
De Souza et al 2019 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Mangalore <75% 1535 Students, teachers and parents Self-administered Modest knowledge 6 13
Saheer et al 2019 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Kerala <75% 341 Dental students Face-to-face Positive knowledge, negative attitude 5 14
Biswas and Bandyopadhyay 2019 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey West Bengal >75% 296 School students Self-administered Positive knowledge 4 15
Sarkar et al 2019 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Kolkata <75% 220 PLWHIV Face-to-face Negative perception 5 16
Limaye et al 2019 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Mumbai >75% 199 College students Face-to-face Positive knowledge and attitude 5 17
Meharda et al 2019 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Ajmer <75% 288 Slums Face-to-face Positive knowledge and poor practice 5 18
Singh et al 2019 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Patna <75% 120 General population Self-administered Positive knowledge and attitude, poor practice 5 19
Khandekar and Walvekar 2018 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Kangrali <75% 400 Married men Face-to-face Positive knowledge and attitude 6 20
Chowdary et al 2018 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Guntur <75% 400 Engineering students Self-administered Positive knowledge and attitude 6 21
Doda et al 2018 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Uttarakhand >75% 385 Consultants, residents, medical students, laboratory technicians, and nurses Face-to-face Positive knowledge, receptive attitude and satisfactory practice 7 22
Roy et al 2018 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Eastern India <75% 36 Medical students Face-to-face Positive knowledge 5 23
Dhanya et al 2017 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Trichur district of Kerala <75% 206 Dentists Self-administered Positive knowledge, attitude and practice 6 24
Banagi Yathiraj et al 2017 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Manglore, Karnataka <75% 409 PLWHIV Face-to-face Poor knowledge 7 25
Subbarao and Akhilesh 2017 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Bengaluru and others <75% 350 Engineering students Face-to-face Positive knowledge and negative attitude 5 26
Rahman and Santhosh Kumar 2017 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Chennai <75% 100 Undergraduate students Self-administered Positive knowledge and negative attitude 6 27
Ngaihte et al 2017 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Delhi, Gandhinagar, Bhubaneswar, and Hyderabad <75% 503 Dentists Face-to-face Positive knowledge and modest attitude 6 28
Kalyanshetti and Nikam 2016 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Belgavi <75% 102 Nursing students Face-to-face Positive knowledge 5 29
Baruah et al 2016 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Jorhat <75% 261 Adolescents Face-to-face Unclear 3 30
Chaudhary et al 2016 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Jaipur >75% 613 School students Face-to-face Positive knowledge 6 31
Gupta et al 2016 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Himachal Pradesh <75% 150 PLWHIV Face-to-face Positive knowledge, positive attitude and negative perception 5 32
Bhagavathula et al 2015 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Warangal, Telangana >75% 542 Family of PLWHIV Face-to-face Positive knowledge, modest attitude and positive perception 8 33
Kumar et al 2015 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Raichur <75% 425 Medical and dental students Self-administered Positive knowledge and attitude 6 34
Gupta et al 2015 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh <75% 250 Technical institute students Face-to-face Positive knowledge 6 35
Mittal et al 2015 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Karnataka, Davangere <75% 100 PLWHIV Face-to-face Poor knowledge and attitude 6 36
Dubey et al 2014 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey North India <75% 630 College students Face-to-face Positive knowledge and attitude 7 37
Grover et al 2014 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey NCR <75% 600 Dental students Face-to-face Positive knowledge and attitude 5 38
Jogdand and Yerpude 2014 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Guntur <75% 138 Medical students Face-to-face Positive knowledge 6 39
Oberoi et al 2014 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey NCR <75% 610 Dental students Face-to-face Poor knowledge and positive attitude 5 40
Prabhu et al 2014 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Tamilnadu <75% 102 Dentists Self-administered Positive knowledge 5 41
Sakalle et al 2014 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Indore district <75% 200 School students Face-to-face Positive knowledge 6 42
Tondare et al 2013 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Mumbai <75% 256 Adolescents Face-to-face Positive knowledge and modest attitude 6 43
Jindal 2013 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Moodbidri <75% 300 College students Face-to-face Positive knowledge 4 44
Hemalatha et al 2013 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Andhra Pradesh <75% 5580 Female sex workers Face-to-face Positive knowledge 4 45
Gupta et al 2013 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Lucknow <75% 215 School students Face-to-face Positive knowledge 5 46
Aggarwal and Panat 2013 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Bareilly >75% 460 Dental students Self-administered Positive knowledge and attitude 6 47
Cooperman et al 2013 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Mumbai <75% 300 Women Face-to-face Positive knowledge 6 48
Fotedar et al 2013 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Shimla >75% 191 Dental students Self-administered Positive knowledge and negative attitude 6 49
Achappa et al 2012 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Manglore >75% 200 Nurses Face-to-face Positive knowledge, attitude and perception 6 50
Yadav et al 2011 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Saurashtra >75% 1237 Young population Face-to-face Positive knowledge 5 51
Hazarika 2010 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Rural and urban <75% 132678 General population Face-to-face Positive knowledge and attitude 4 52
Jayanna et al 2010 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Karnataka <75% 393 Female sex workers Face-to-face Unclear 4 53
Taraphdar et al 2010 Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey Kolkata >75% 90 PLWHIV Face-to-face Positive knowledge and attitude 5 54

aJoanna Briggs Institute’s criteria