Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 21;9(6):1343. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9061343

Table 1.

Summary of studies reporting prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis identified in deer. Potentially zoonotic subtypes are in bold.

Host (Scientific Name) Country Source of Deer No. of Samples Examined/
No. of Positives (%)
Subtype(s) References
Eurasia elk (Alces alces) United Kingdom Zoo 2/1 (50%) a ST4(1), ST10(1), ST14(1), ND(1) [27]
United Kingdom Zoo 3/1 (33.3%) a ST4(1), ST10(1), ST14(4) [28]
Fallow deer (Dama dama) China Captive 2/1 (50%) ST10(1) [24]
Mauritius Zoo 2/2 (100%) ST10(2) [25]
Gray brocket (Mazama gouazoubira) Brazil Captive 1/1 (100%) ST5(1) [26]
Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus) South Korea Wild 125/51 (40.8%) ST4(1), ST14(25) b [29]
Marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) Brazil Captive 1/1 (100%) ND(1) b [26]
Muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi) United Kingdom Zoo 1/1(100%) ST14(1) [27]
United Kingdom Zoo 1/1(100%) ST13(1) [28]
Red deer (Cervus elaphus) Australia Wild 50/1 (2%) ST4(1) [30]
China Captive 3/1 (33.3%) ST10(1) [24]
China Zoo 5/2 (40%) ST10(2) [31]
United Kingdom Zoo 1/1(100%) a ST4(2), ST10(6) [27]
United Kingdom Zoo 3/1(33.3%) a ST4(3), ST10(5) [28]
Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) China Farm 104/7 (6.7%) ST10(3), ST13(4) [23]
United Kingdom Zoo 1/1(100%) ST10(1) [28]
Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) Denmark Zoo 1 c ST10(1) [32]
United Kingdom Zoo 2/1 (50%) ST5(1) [25]
Sika deer (Cervus nippon) China Farm 6/760 (0.8%) ST10(5), ST14(1) [33]
China Captive 8/3 (37.5%) ST10(3) [24]
China Farm 82/12 (14.6%) ST10(10), ST14(2) [23]
China Zoo 11/1 (9.1%) ST1(1) [4]
Spotted deer (Axis axis) Bangladesh Zoo 30/1 (3.3%) ST14(1) [34]
White-lipped deer (Cervus albirostris) China Captive 1/1 (100%) ST10(1) [24]
White tailed-deer (Odocoileus virginianus) United States Wild 80/71 (88.8) ST1(1), ST3(2), ST4(3), ST10(51), ST14(30), ST21(14), ST23(14), ST24(55), ST25(1), ST26(2), ST30(11), ST31(19) d This study

ND: Not determined. a The number of STs identified is based on the number of sequence positive clones obtained and does not correspond with the number of positive samples identified. b Not all PCR positive samples were successfully sequenced. c This study was not a survey. d The numbers of STs exceed the number of samples because multiple subtypes were observed in individual samples. For details of ST combinations, see Table 2.